

Adobe Experience Manager and Sendbird cater to different yet interconnected domains in the digital space. Adobe Experience Manager generally leads in advanced content management, while Sendbird is the go-to for enhancing direct communication features.
Features: Adobe Experience Manager delivers a complete content management system, offering features like Digital Asset Management, seamless integration with Adobe's ecosystem, and robust workflow automation. Sendbird provides a strong chat API, user-friendly SDKs, and features like real-time messaging and file transfer capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Adobe Experience Manager could improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing usability for non-technical users, and reducing initial setup costs. For Sendbird, refining analytics capabilities, expanding beyond chat functionalities, and providing more extensive documentation could significantly enhance its offering.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Experience Manager requires technical expertise for deployment but offers comprehensive support and documentation. Sendbird is straightforward to deploy with responsive customer support, making it easy for organizations to integrate communication features quickly.
Pricing and ROI: Adobe Experience Manager, while providing extensive content solutions, often involves high initial costs and longer ROI periods. Sendbird, on the other hand, offers competitive pricing with faster ROI due to its focused features on communication, particularly benefiting businesses aiming to enhance customer interaction efficiently.
I have seen a return on investment through reduction in time to market, automation through AI, and the availability of very scalable solutions.
They are attentive to big companies but tend to be negligent towards mid-sized companies.
There are Adobe engineers, sales representatives, and engineers assigned to Sephora North America.
For P1 tickets, the resolution time is approximately four hours.
You cannot simply add more servers without purchasing the license.
Adobe Experience Manager's scalability is excellent, as it reduces infrastructure and maintenance costs.
Adobe Experience Manager can handle numerous projects because more projects can be developed, enhanced, and numerous components can be reused in many projects and published.
The scalability is quite effective.
Adobe Experience Manager is a stable tool.
Since they are enterprise and have significant digital business coming through the digital medium, the stability of the product is very important.
Sendbird works well overall, the stability is sometimes affected by chat lists being randomly ordered rather than in chronological order.
Technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.
There is a feature missing where if content is created on the UAT environment and needs to be transferred or synced to the production environment, there is no direct way of doing the sync.
Many people complain about the price as it's one of the most expensive tools.
The documentation for integrating with the Flutter framework is lacking detailed information.
For large enterprises, the cost is often comparable with other major CMSs.
Adobe Experience Manager is expensive compared to competitors.
The price is significantly high.
The subscription cost is quite high, which prevents us from subscribing before the project completion and user testing.
Feature-wise, I believe the dispatcher module is the best aspect of Adobe Experience Manager.
Adobe Experience Manager has made document management smoother because many people use Adobe, making it simpler for me to modify and resend PDF documents.
Adobe Experience Manager increases operational efficiency through centralized assets and reduces time spent searching, editing, and managing files.
Features similar to WhatsApp, such as online and offline statuses, message reactions, and replies, add significant value.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Adobe Experience Manager | 3.0% |
| Sendbird | 1.7% |
| Other | 95.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.
Sendbird offers scalable, API-driven chat features tailored for real-time messaging, supporting ease of integration and robust developer tools.
Sendbird is known for its scalability in managing extensive chat groups and API-based operations, complemented by an effective developer portal. It offers real-time messaging with features like file transfer, receipt IDs, typing indicators, and message reactions, all enhancing communication. The platform optimizes reliability through metadata and online/offline messaging capabilities. However, users experience challenges with SDK connection delays, URL thumbnail generation, and message display, particularly during version transitions. Concerns about pricing, support, and documentation quality, as well as the absence of audio/video calls and analytics tools, are mentioned.
What are Sendbird's most noteworthy features?Sendbird is implemented across industries for chat functionality. In travel, it connects users with flight attendants; in business, it facilitates customer interactions. Healthcare utilizes it for patient-doctor consultations. Social media and real-time applications employ it for chats and video calls, optimizing communication in mobile apps and enhancing user and business interactions in salon applications.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.