Adobe Experience Manager vs DocuShare comparison

Adobe and Xerox are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Adobe is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Xerox is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0. Adobe holds a 3.0% mindshare in ECM, compared to Xerox’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Xerox users who would recommend it.

Adobe Experience Manager

Read 21 Adobe Experience Manager reviews

913 Views
547 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

DocuShare

Read 4 DocuShare reviews

228 Views
136 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

DocuShare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Adobe Experience Manager and DocuShare compete in content and document management. Adobe Experience Manager has the upper hand in sophisticated content management, offering extensive digital media handling tools that may justify its higher price point.

Features: Adobe Experience Manager provides diverse content management functionalities such as robust digital asset management, personalization, and extensive campaign management. It is tailored for complex, large-scale digital experiences. DocuShare focuses on document management, offering efficient tools for capturing, indexing, and storing documents. It provides a user-friendly interface, workflow automation, and straightforward versioning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Experience Manager could enhance its ease of use for beginners, reduce its deployment complexity, and improve integration costs for smaller businesses. DocuShare might improve its advanced content management features, offer more comprehensive media handling, and expand its integration capabilities with other enterprise tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Experience Manager's deployment can demand significant resources due to its complexity, but it benefits from strong system support. DocuShare presents a simpler deployment process that is more accessible for businesses without extensive IT infrastructure. Adobe offers comprehensive support suited to complex setups, whereas DocuShare’s support efficiently caters to its straightforward setup needs.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Experience Manager has higher upfront costs, offering a strong ROI for those fully utilizing its capabilities. DocuShare presents more affordable pricing with a quicker ROI for businesses seeking cost-effectiveness over advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (2nd), Enterprise Social Software (5th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (1st)

DocuShare

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 3.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DocuShare is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Thomas Becker

Managing Partner(Austria) at a integrator with 11-50 employees

Impressive integration of customer behavior with an easy setup and okay support

I've worked with all major content management systems. Currently, I work with the leaders such as Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and Acquia Working with big companies, I help them either consider setting up a new content management system or address issues they might have with their existing…

Read full review

R Williams

Software Analyst at Altron

The new releases incorporate significant advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language processing capabilities

Version control interface is very good. The new releases of DocuShare incorporate significant advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language processing capabilities. For instance, when you upload a document into DocuShare, you no longer need to set up templates to identify and extract important fields. The system automatically reads the document and identifies key information. For example, in a contract document between two entities, it can recognize the contract start date, end date, reference number, and other relevant details without manual intervention. This automated process streamlines document management. You should know your requirements and understand your environment, as well as the goals you want to achieve. Try out the demo first to see if it fits your needs and objectives before making a decision. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution."

"I like the profiling and segmentation."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website."

"I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle."

"Easy to work with the solution."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

More Adobe Experience Manager pros

"The software development kit can be customized."

Cons

"Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved."

"Adobe Experience Manager could improve by allowing the reuse of components like a progress bar across multiple pages to make the development process more efficient."

"The licenses are very expensive."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

More Adobe Experience Manager cons

"The user interface could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's really costly."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?

It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?

The content is created as Adobe Experience Manager has an author, publisher, and dispatcher. However, there is a feature missing where if content is created on the UAT environment and needs to be t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?

We are working on digital experience platforms such as Adobe Experience Manager or Sitefinity. It's for powering their customer-facing website, not the transaction portal, but the brochureware port...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DocuShare?

The user interface could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DocuShare?

We use the solution for electronic document filing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DocuShare?

See all answers

Comparisons

Adobe CQ5 vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Web CMS vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Adobe Experience Manager Competitors

SharePoint vs DocuShare

Compared 100% of the time

More DocuShare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager

June 2025

Download Adobe Experience Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

June 2025

Download DocuShare product report

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud

No data available

Overview

Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.

Adobe

Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents

Xerox

Sample Customers

Metra

Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare

June 2025

Free Report: Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Experience Manager vs. DocuShare report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.