Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CentOS Logo

Top 10 CentOS Alternatives

Vendor: CentOS
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top CentOS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CentOS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Ubuntu Linux, and Rocky Linux. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

CentOS surpasses its competitors by offering a robust open-source platform with excellent security, stability, and comprehensive support, making it an ideal choice for servers and enterprise environments seeking reliable performance and cost-efficiency.

CentOS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CentOS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CentOS Logo
CentOS Logo
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
4.4 out of 5
RHEL offers stability and enterprise-grade support with robust security, appealing to businesses needing reliable solutions. In comparison, CentOS attracts budget-conscious users seeking cost-effective alternatives with similar stability and compatibility, ideal for environments where licensing costs and commercial support are less critical.
Download CentOS vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Report
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS which is available for free. This difference highlights Red Hat's enterprise support model versus the community-driven nature of CentOS.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS which is available for free. This difference highlights Red Hat's enterprise support model versus the community-driven nature of CentOS.
CentOS Logo
Ubuntu Linux
4.3 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Ubuntu Linux
4.3 out of 5
Ubuntu Linux offers superior features with open-source availability and extensive community support, ideal for cloud adaptability. In comparison, CentOS ensures stability and Red Hat compatibility, making it a reliable choice for long-term projects with minimal updates and zero licensing costs.
Download CentOS vs. Ubuntu Linux Report
Ubuntu Linux setup cost is significantly higher than CentOS, offering advanced features that may appeal to businesses prioritizing innovative solutions. Conversely, CentOS is more budget-friendly, appealing to enterprises seeking cost-effective stability.
View comparison
Pricing
Ubuntu Linux setup cost is significantly higher than CentOS, offering advanced features that may appeal to businesses prioritizing innovative solutions. Conversely, CentOS is more budget-friendly, appealing to enterprises seeking cost-effective stability.
CentOS Logo
Rocky Linux
4.3 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Rocky Linux
4.3 out of 5
CentOS offers stability and compatibility with Red Hat, suitable for production. In comparison, Rocky Linux focuses on community-driven support and active updating. Tech buyers might choose CentOS for reliability, while Rocky Linux appeals with its open-source community commitment for continuity and updates.
Download CentOS vs. Rocky Linux Report
CentOS typically offers lower setup costs compared to Rocky Linux. However, Rocky Linux may provide broader community support, which can be a deciding factor for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS typically offers lower setup costs compared to Rocky Linux. However, Rocky Linux may provide broader community support, which can be a deciding factor for some users.
CentOS Logo
Oracle Linux
4.2 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Oracle Linux
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Linux supports zero-downtime updates via Ksplice, enhancing compatibility with Oracle products. In comparison, CentOS aligns closely with Red Hat for stability. Oracle offers competitive enterprise support, while CentOS provides cost-effective, open-source solutions backed by community support.
Download CentOS vs. Oracle Linux Report
Oracle Linux often incurs higher setup costs compared to CentOS, which is typically more affordable, making it a budget-friendly choice for users prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Linux often incurs higher setup costs compared to CentOS, which is typically more affordable, making it a budget-friendly choice for users prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
CentOS Logo
Windows Server
4.1 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Windows Server
4.1 out of 5
CentOS attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective open-source nature, stability, and Linux compatibility. In comparison, Windows Server appeals due to its robust feature set and ease with enterprise applications, despite its higher cost and complex licensing.
Download CentOS vs. Windows Server Report
CentOS offers a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, which is generally more expensive to implement. This cost difference highlights the budget-friendly advantage of CentOS for users seeking a cost-effective server solution.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS offers a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, which is generally more expensive to implement. This cost difference highlights the budget-friendly advantage of CentOS for users seeking a cost-effective server solution.
CentOS Logo
CentOS Logo
SUSE Linux Enterprise
4.3 out of 5
SUSE Linux Enterprise provides robust enterprise application support with a user-friendly administration tool, excelling in SAP HANA environments. In comparison, CentOS aligns with Red Hat standards, appealing for web-based applications with minimal resources and community support, though it lacks direct vendor assistance.
Download CentOS vs. SUSE Linux Enterprise Report
SUSE Linux Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS, which offers a free installation option, making CentOS a more budget-friendly choice for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SUSE Linux Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS, which offers a free installation option, making CentOS a more budget-friendly choice for initial deployment.
CentOS Logo
openSUSE Leap
4.6 out of 5
CentOS Logo
openSUSE Leap
4.6 out of 5
CentOS offers stability and reliability with Red Hat compatibility, attracting enterprises due to its customization and security features without cost. In comparison, openSUSE Leap emphasizes virtualization and advanced technologies like BTRFS, appealing to users needing robust performance and efficient deployment.
Download CentOS vs. openSUSE Leap Report
CentOS offers lower setup costs, making it an economical choice, while openSUSE Leap may involve higher initial expenses but potentially provides more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS offers lower setup costs, making it an economical choice, while openSUSE Leap may involve higher initial expenses but potentially provides more comprehensive features.
CentOS Logo
Windows 10
4.1 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Windows 10
4.1 out of 5
CentOS provides cost-effectiveness and stability with open-source flexibility, making it ideal for organizations needing long-term support and efficient resource management. In comparison, Windows 10 delivers comprehensive tools and enterprise features, benefiting businesses requiring integrated applications and structured support despite higher licensing costs.
Download CentOS vs. Windows 10 Report
CentOS offers a cost-effective setup, whereas Windows 10 requires a higher initial investment, highlighting CentOS as the more economical choice. The key difference lies in the setup costs, set lower for CentOS compared to the higher expense for Windows 10.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS offers a cost-effective setup, whereas Windows 10 requires a higher initial investment, highlighting CentOS as the more economical choice. The key difference lies in the setup costs, set lower for CentOS compared to the higher expense for Windows 10.
CentOS Logo
Fedora Linux
4.5 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Fedora Linux
4.5 out of 5
CentOS provides a stable, enterprise-focused platform ideal for long-term server deployment with its emphasis on cost-efficiency and predictability. In comparison, Fedora Linux offers cutting-edge features and rapid updates, appealing to those seeking innovation and development flexibility in technical environments.
CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Fedora Linux, making it budget-friendly, while Fedora offers a higher initial cost due to its cutting-edge features, reflecting its focus on providing the latest technology advancements.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Fedora Linux, making it budget-friendly, while Fedora offers a higher initial cost due to its cutting-edge features, reflecting its focus on providing the latest technology advancements.
CentOS Logo
Kali Linux
4.3 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Kali Linux
4.3 out of 5
CentOS offers stability and strong compatibility for enterprise environments. In comparison, Kali Linux provides a comprehensive suite of cybersecurity tools, ideal for penetration testing. A tech buyer may choose CentOS for reliability and customization or Kali Linux for security-focused applications.
Download CentOS vs. Kali Linux Report
CentOS features a minimal setup cost, catering to budget-conscious users, while Kali Linux presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its specialized security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS features a minimal setup cost, catering to budget-conscious users, while Kali Linux presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its specialized security tools.
CentOS Logo
Oracle Solaris
4.3 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Oracle Solaris
4.3 out of 5
CentOS provides a cost-effective, stable platform with strong community support and adherence to Linux standards. In comparison, Oracle Solaris offers advanced performance with robust security and integrated features, ideal for those investing in Oracle hardware and software despite higher costs.
Download CentOS vs. Oracle Solaris Report
CentOS offers a lower setup cost, while Oracle Solaris presents a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a significant divergence in affordability between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS offers a lower setup cost, while Oracle Solaris presents a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a significant divergence in affordability between these solutions.
CentOS Logo
Debian
1 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Debian
1 out of 5
CentOS offers enterprise-grade support, stability, and SELinux-enhanced security, attracting those needing reliable systems. In comparison, Debian provides extensive package availability and adaptability, appealing to tech buyers favoring flexibility and community resources, especially where experienced administrators manage deployments without the necessity for formal support.
CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Debian's higher setup cost, highlighting a cost-effective option in CentOS for initial implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Debian's higher setup cost, highlighting a cost-effective option in CentOS for initial implementations.
CentOS Logo
Alpine Linux
1 out of 5
CentOS Logo
Alpine Linux
1 out of 5
CentOS appeals to enterprises needing robust features, extensive support, and long-term stability. In comparison, Alpine Linux attracts users prioritizing security, lighter resource use, and efficiency in containerized environments. A tech buyer may choose based on specific needs like support, efficiency, or resource management.
CentOS has a higher setup cost, offering extensive support, whereas Alpine Linux provides a lower-cost option with minimal setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS has a higher setup cost, offering extensive support, whereas Alpine Linux provides a lower-cost option with minimal setup requirements.
CentOS Logo
CentOS Logo
Flatcar Container Linux
4.0 out of 5
CentOS provides extensive software support and stability for enterprise environments. In comparison, Flatcar Container Linux emphasizes minimalism with security in container deployments. CentOS offers traditional customization and community backing, while Flatcar prioritizes automatic updates and efficiency for cloud-native scalability.
CentOS involves minimal setup costs, whereas Flatcar Container Linux generally incurs lower expenses due to its streamlined deployment approach, highlighting a cost-effective solution for users prioritizing efficient installation procedures.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS involves minimal setup costs, whereas Flatcar Container Linux generally incurs lower expenses due to its streamlined deployment approach, highlighting a cost-effective solution for users prioritizing efficient installation procedures.

Related categories

Operating Systems (OS) for Business
OpenStack