

CentOS and Google Chrome Enterprise compete in the realm of operating systems, with CentOS being a server OS and Google Chrome Enterprise focusing on a cloud-centric solution. Google Chrome Enterprise has the upper hand due to its superior integration with cloud services and centralized management capabilities.
Features: CentOS is favored for its stability, extensive hardware support, and powerful command-line interface, making it ideal for web and database servers. Google Chrome Enterprise is valued for security, ease of management, and cloud integration, with continuous updates and central management for devices and user accounts.
Room for Improvement: CentOS needs to enhance user-friendliness, provide more intuitive documentation, and address hardware support issues. Google Chrome Enterprise could improve memory management and user experience, refine extension support, and offer more flexible pricing options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CentOS thrives in on-premises environments, relying on forums for support due to lack of formal customer service. Google Chrome Enterprise excels in public cloud deployment, offering centralized management and structured customer service that meets expectations in educational and enterprise settings.
Pricing and ROI: CentOS is cost-effective, being open source with community support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Google Chrome Enterprise involves a licensing fee reflecting its comprehensive features and security, with pricing perceived as reasonable for its operational efficiency and security benefits.
I have seen a return on investment, particularly in terms of money saved because I do not pay for the servers.
The money saved was significant, approximately fifteen percent of our IT budget.
It saved a lot of time through troubleshooting, which gives us substantial room for improvement in terms of fixing things.
I would rate the customer support for CentOS a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.
I've seen many people across the globe interacting, and when users encounter issues, the community provides solutions.
I would rate the documentation about eight in terms of usefulness.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
There are features regarding QR code setup, compatibility, and security.
CentOS is scalable and user-friendly without requiring complex configurations.
It allows users to scale resources vertically for upgrading hardware and horizontally by adding more servers, making it suitable for modern web hosting and containerized applications.
CentOS's scalability for my organization has handled growth and changing needs smoothly.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I would just need to move the container I have set up on Cloud Run to a VM or cluster, which could be straightforward.
CentOS is stable, reliable, flexible, and very useful.
CentOS's simplicity and stability make it easy to use.
I believe CentOS is stable, but we are gradually moving away from it.
I consider Google Chrome Enterprise to be both stable and scalable.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
The documentation and support could be improved, along with compatibility with newer hardware as hardware continually evolves over time.
Kernel parameters, sysctl config details, tuned profiles, process prioritization, optimized disk, and input scheduler choice are all points for performance optimization.
CentOS RADIUS server handles sensitive authentication data, so improving security is the priority.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements, they need to declare some security details; they are applying security but not publishing the details about the security applied.
There was no cost in terms of deploying it or getting the license for it.
CentOS is a free product with free updates.
The enterprise subscription cost is at a certain level, but CentOS saves customers from paying additional money, optimizing costs for enterprises and startups involved in application development.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
The interface is optimized in terms of the UI and user experience.
CentOS has helped me most through its enterprise-level stability.
The update cycle changed when CentOS was prioritized for updates, causing stability issues.
In my experience, the best feature that CentOS offers is the network configuration of a device from the command-line interface, which is exceptionally clean.
The best aspects of Google Chrome Enterprise are its compatibility with everything, smooth management, and frequent security patching, which I find nice to use.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CentOS | 4.4% |
| Google Chrome Enterprise | 0.6% |
| Other | 95.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
CentOS offers a stable, secure, and compatible environment with Red Hat packages, providing robust performance and cost efficiency. Its lightweight, scalable design and strong community support make it ideal for handling heavy workloads with limited resources.
CentOS is a popular choice for organizations seeking reliable server and virtualization solutions. Known for its robust stability and security, it offers seamless integration and maintenance. However, after a shift from Red Hat, some challenges emerged, including weak NFS client performance and a more complex interface, which beginners find challenging alongside insufficient documentation. Despite these, CentOS remains a favored option for deploying web applications, server installations, and supporting cloud solutions, thanks to its efficient use in monitoring, databases, and telecommunications.
What are CentOS's key features?CentOS is widely used in industries requiring robust infrastructure, such as web hosting, scientific computing, and telecommunications. In data centers, companies deploy it to support virtual environments, testing, and development. The OS powers business applications, email servers, and cloud solutions, offering a cost-effective alternative to Red Hat.
Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.