We performed a comparison between CentOS and Google Chrome Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CentOS is very easy to use, and all the commands are user-friendly."
"Setup is straightforward. You can complete it in about 30 minutes."
"It is a scalable and cost-effective product compared to public cloud solutions."
"CentOS's most valuable features are that it's cost-saving and helps to scale down your usage."
"The most valuable feature is the limited resources the solution uses in operation."
"The solution is productive."
"It has minimal updates compared to other distributions."
"I like its stability, performance, and usability."
"The breadth and capability of the various extensions and plug-ins that are out there for Chrome to do additional things on top of just working in the browser are fantastic."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"The best part of Chrome is security."
"Google Sheets and Google Docs are the most valuable features of the solution."
"We use the product to run applications and devices."
"Bookmarking is very good because they are synchronized across all devices."
"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"We would like Red Hat to keep supporting the solution but they have decided to get rid of it and there isn't much we can do about it."
"The solution might be discontinued but I hope that IBM will continue to develop it and improve on the functionally and features."
"The YUM install manager can be improved. It is below average as compared to the other install managers. This is the only major problem that I see with CentOS. They should reduce dependency on the YUM manager."
"Like every operating system, it could be more secure."
"I would like the integration to be more secure."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."
"Updates are going to a streaming version."
"It would be ideal if Red Hat would continue the CentOS versions in an open-source format. They seem to be moving away from that. Now only paid versions are available."
"Setting up anything resembling a shared inbox is still kind of a giant pain in the solution."
"In an upcoming release, the enhanced troubleshooting feature needs to improve to be able to identify the issues for the use case and for the user experience."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"The solution could be made cheaper."
"They need to deal with their memory management."
"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The product's stability can be better."
CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 14 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows Server and openSUSE Leap, whereas Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). See our CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
