CentOS vs Google Chrome Enterprise comparison

CentOS and Google are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. CentOS is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8, while Google is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. CentOS holds a 4.5% mindshare in OSB, compared to Google’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of CentOS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Google users who would recommend it.

CentOS

Read 69 CentOS reviews

5,776 Views
5,776 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Chrome Enterprise

Read 21 Google Chrome Enterprise reviews

2,302 Views
345 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CentOS

Google Chrome Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 3, 2025

CentOS and Google Chrome Enterprise compete in the server and enterprise software categories. Despite CentOS being cost-effective, Google Chrome Enterprise has the upper hand due to its strong integration with Google services and superior customer support.

Features: CentOS provides a stable, open-source platform compatible with Red Hat, making it reliable and cost-effective. It has strong community support and compliance with Linux Standards Base. Google Chrome Enterprise is known for its security, ease of management, and seamless integration with Google services, offering a cloud-based solution that enhances its appeal.

Room for Improvement: CentOS faces challenges with stability due to its transition towards stream updates, impacting user confidence. It also lacks formal technical support with reliance on community forums. Google Chrome Enterprise needs enhancements in memory management and integration of additional extensions. Users also seek improved AI capabilities and more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CentOS is typically deployed on-premises, favored for its stability and community-driven support model, though it lacks formal customer service. Google Chrome Enterprise leverages public cloud deployment, with robust technical support and customer service, further enhanced by its integration with Google's ecosystem, making it user-friendly and easier to manage for enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: CentOS is a cost-effective choice because it is open-source, eliminating licensing fees, ideal for budget-conscious users, though it does not track ROI. Google Chrome Enterprise, while slightly more expensive, offers clearer ROI through enhanced productivity and support features. Its pricing is reasonable, especially for educational and non-profit institutions, with structured payment plans adding value for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CentOS

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Chrome Enterprise

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Browsers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of CentOS is 4.5%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Chrome Enterprise is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operating Systems (OS) for Business Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CentOS	4.5%
Google Chrome Enterprise	0.4%
Other	95.1%

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

Featured Reviews

Mahender Nirwan

Software developer at TAIGLE LLC

In-depth documentation available and command-line utility works well

One issue I recently faced, but I think it was due to my IT support guys, was that when the server storage gets full, the service crashes. It's very difficult to regain access and stability in that situation. That could be improved. So, the stability might be improved. But I don't think it's a CentOS-level issue. The system administrators need to come up with a solution for that, but I don't think it's CentOS's fault. I haven't done any research [R&D] on this issue. There's one thing for sure. We recently migrated from CentOS 7 to CentOS 9, and it was a bit difficult. For example, updating Windows is simple; you just download it, and it takes about 15-20 minutes. But that's not the case with migrating from CentOS 7 to 9. We had to back up the entire server, launch a new server, and then restore the backup to the new server. We couldn't directly migrate. I think that was a bit of a problem. The setup and updates are not that new in CentOS.

Read full review

Sonu Thomas

Operations Manager at Cognitive Global

Adapting to changes is smooth with flexible storage options and responsive support

I can't use Google Chrome Enterprise for my bank site because it could be the bank site issue. Something is breaking on the logging page itself, so it could be a cookies issue. As long as it is working in Edge, I am content with that. Google account storage could use some improvements. They should have a better compression mechanism or increase the free data space to the next level; at least make it 30 or 40 GB. According to the current trend, increasing the free version is better so that people can sustain for some time before making a purchase. There could be more flexible options for pricing and license for Google Chrome Enterprise. Currently, there are maybe two, three, or four options, but there should be something lesser than one TB. Customers should be able to choose extra storage according to their needs, such as 50 GB on demand, rather than predefined sizes. There aren't many complaints about the Google Admin console; maybe some improvements, especially with the parent control part. Perhaps I didn't explore that much; that could be a reason.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There's lots of great documentation available."

"The scalability of CentOS is good. We can deploy the operating system in many hardware, laptops, and servers."

"Setting up CentOS is straightforward, and you simply boot from a CD to get started."

"We used the solution as an operating system."

"It’s scalable."

"It has minimal updates compared to other distributions."

"Offers useful information and has good compatibility."

"The user access level is most valuable. When you do administration with CentOS, the number of customizations that you can do for each user is higher than other solutions. It is very customizable."

More CentOS pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."

"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."

"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."

"The standout advantage of Google Chrome Enterprise is its ease of use; it is easy to share information within the Share Drive."

"Chrome functions as a comprehensive solution due to its continuous self-evaluation and improvement. The evolution process has been significant, with a notable distance covered from its inception to the present. Notably, features like VPN support have been incorporated over time, enhancing the platform's capabilities. A distinctive feature is that users don't even need to know the Wi-Fi password; upon signing into the machine, internet connectivity is established immediately. Furthermore, the cloud storage system ensures data isn't stored locally, making it seamless for users to switch between machines. In summary, Google Chrome Enterprise is an excellent solution, particularly when there's a shortage of available manpower."

"In this solution, I enjoy using features that are more sophisticated in terms of centralized management to maintain consistent security."

"Google Sheets and Google Docs are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution has been stable."

More Google Chrome Enterprise pros

Cons

"The support could be a bit better."

"If CentOS could add Office features then that would be beneficial. Additionally, the UI could improve."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."

"The solution must improve its security."

"CentOS NetworkManager is an area of concern in the solution that needs improvement, and it is the same with other products from Red Hat."

"The interface could be improved."

"We are aware that the licensing has shifted, and it's not a change we've liked."

"The price could be better. They could add more drivers in terms of peripherals and other things. Add more drivers for the Linux specifications in the next release. Right now, they are just pushing to have more drivers for Windows instead of Linux."

More CentOS cons

"There are many plugins available, which are often promoted through ads. However, there's a lack of clear information on whether they are free or if they will eventually require credit card information."

"In an upcoming release, the enhanced troubleshooting feature needs to improve to be able to identify the issues for the use case and for the user experience."

"Google Chrome Enterprise doesn't use AI in its solution."

"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."

"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"I wish there was a way that they could update things a little less often if anything. I think a lot of enterprise customers are frustrated... Certain plug-ins like ad blockers will lose some functionality in the next quarter to half a year."

"Setting up anything resembling a shared inbox is still kind of a giant pain in the solution."

"It's a bit bulky. If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system."

More Google Chrome Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is open-source, which means it is a free product. It has a one-time deployment cost."

"CentOS is a free solution."

"CentOS is an expensive solution. There are other solutions that are rated at the top that are not expensive, such as Red Hat."

"The solution is free of cost to use."

"It's freeware, so we can use it without worrying about licensing."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"We are using a subscription-based license option for CentOS."

"The solution is not subscription-based, unlike Red Hat."

More CentOS pricing and cost advice

"Pricing varies significantly based on different regions and specific requirements. The cost can differ for the Euro price as opposed to the Asia-specific price. Generally, the standard pricing falls within the range of twenty-five to thirty dollars per license. This payment can be structured on a monthly or yearly basis. Opting for the yearly payment plan often comes with an added discount, either directly from Google or through negotiations with your vendor."

"We are on a monthly subscription for this solution."

"Yearly payments are to be made towards the licensing costs of Google Chrome Enterprise. It is not an expensive solution. I rate the solution's pricing model a six out of ten. There is a need to pay an extra cost in addition to the solution's standard licensing fees."

"Google Chrome Enterprise is a medium-priced solution."

"The product price is very good in my opinion."

"So all I can say is just for us since we just recently re-upped our three-year contract for Google Education Enterprise, whatever the name is for their highest level enterprise...I found the pricing to be pretty reasonable overall."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user281973

Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2017

It's improved our company's system environments that run Oracle databases.

Red Hat is mission critical to our environment Red Hat has improved the mission critical environments running Oracle databases, while CentOS has improved our web environment and MySQL. Oracle and SAP Environment and all HPC environments. 10 years No issues Very stable i don´t find any problem…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) or CentOS?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has fe...

See all answers

What do you like most about CentOS?

CentOS is very easy to use, and all the commands are user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CentOS?

CentOS is a free product with free updates. There are third-party companies available for support, but they charge varying amounts for their services.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Chrome Enterprise?

The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chrome Enterprise?

I haven't paid for any services related to Google Chrome Enterprise.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Chrome Enterprise?

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Linux vs CentOS

Compared 28% of the time

Kali Linux vs CentOS

Compared 16% of the time

Ubuntu Linux vs CentOS

Compared 11% of the time

SUSE Linux Enterprise vs CentOS

Compared 7% of the time

Windows Server vs CentOS

Compared 7% of the time

More CentOS Competitors

Island vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 50% of the time

Prisma Access Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

Avira Secure Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Windows Server vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Chrome Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CentOS

October 2025

Download CentOS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise

September 2025

Download Google Chrome Enterprise product report

Also Known As

CentOS 7 (x86_64) - with Updates HVM

Chrome Enterprise

Overview

CentOS offers a stable, secure, and compatible environment with Red Hat packages, providing robust performance and cost efficiency. Its lightweight, scalable design and strong community support make it ideal for handling heavy workloads with limited resources.

CentOS is a popular choice for organizations seeking reliable server and virtualization solutions. Known for its robust stability and security, it offers seamless integration and maintenance. However, after a shift from Red Hat, some challenges emerged, including weak NFS client performance and a more complex interface, which beginners find challenging alongside insufficient documentation. Despite these, CentOS remains a favored option for deploying web applications, server installations, and supporting cloud solutions, thanks to its efficient use in monitoring, databases, and telecommunications.

What are CentOS's key features?

Stability: Maintains a consistent performance, essential for mission-critical environments.
Security: Offers robust safeguards, aligning with Red Hat's trusted security packages.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with Red Hat ecosystems, enhancing versatility.
Cost Efficiency: Open-source approach reduces expenses compared to proprietary systems.
Community Support: Access to extensive resources and assistance from a dedicated user base.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Performance: Efficient resource management even under heavy workloads.
Integration Ease: Smooth integration with existing IT infrastructures.
Scalability: Ability to grow with changing requirements, supporting diverse applications.
Flexibility: Adaptable to a wide range of industries and use cases.
Reliability: Trusted for critical operations and consistent service delivery.

CentOS is widely used in industries requiring robust infrastructure, such as web hosting, scientific computing, and telecommunications. In data centers, companies deploy it to support virtual environments, testing, and development. The OS powers business applications, email servers, and cloud solutions, offering a cost-effective alternative to Red Hat.

CentOS

Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Netflix, Coca Cola, Pinterest, Toyota, Vertex, LafargeHolcim, MedXM, DOT Comm, Whirlpool

Buyer's Guide

CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise

September 2025

Free Report: CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise report.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.