CentOS vs Windows Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CentOS Logo
13,755 views|13,626 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
19,275 views|14,618 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Oct 30, 2022

We performed a comparison between CentOS and Windows Server based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say deployment is easy.
  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability.

    CentOS users like the solution’s ease of use and intuitive UI and say it is robust. Reviewers would like to see improved security, additional coding tools, and better integration.

    Windows Server users like the Active Directory tool and say the solution performs well. Users mention that the solution’s security needs to be improved.
  • Pricing: CentOS is a community-driven free software solution. Most Windows Server reviewers feel that it is an expensive product.
  • Service and Support: CentOS’s support is community-based. Users relate that the knowledge base is very trustworthy and it is very easy to get issues resolved quickly. Windows Server users have mixed reviews for the product’s support.

Comparison Results: In this comparison, CentOS has a slight edge over Windows Server because it is free whereas Windows Server is considered expensive. Users also favor the technical support they receive from CentOS.

To learn more, read our detailed CentOS vs. Windows Server Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward and not complex, especially if you are familiar with CLI.""The scalability of CentOS is good. We can deploy the operating system in many hardware, laptops, and servers.""The user access level is most valuable. When you do administration with CentOS, the number of customizations that you can do for each user is higher than other solutions. It is very customizable.""The user interface of CentOS is intuitive, we can also use the command prompt.""The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with RedHat.""It is a scalable and cost-effective product compared to public cloud solutions.""The stability of this solution is its most useful feature. It is a high quality product and you know what you're getting. You also receive wide support from the community.""CentOS' best feature is that it's the standard product for Linux, so it's well-supported."

More CentOS Pros →

"Nothing is required for the maintenance of the solution, Microsoft does everything. It is very good and robust.""The performance is good.""Overall, Windows Server 2016 provides a stable environment for some of the very large workloads that it is subjected to in our organization, and it is very easy to use.""If everything is configured correctly this solution provides high performance. Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than any of the Linux-based solutions.""The solution is easy to use. We are satisfied with its performance.""The most valuable feature of this solution is Hyper-V Live Migration for Critical applications.""The stability of the Windows Server is good.""The installation of the solution is becoming easier every year after new releases. The first installation can take an hour but you can use templates to make the installation very quick."

More Windows Server Pros →

Cons
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.""We would like Red Hat to keep supporting the solution but they have decided to get rid of it and there isn't much we can do about it.""CentOS is not easy.""The solution is stable, however, it could always be even more stable if possible.""If a proper GUI-based tool was connected remotely or on the machine, it could be a great addition to CentOS.""The interface could be improved.""There could be more integration features included in the product.""It would be ideal if Red Hat would continue the CentOS versions in an open-source format. They seem to be moving away from that. Now only paid versions are available."

More CentOS Cons →

"The performance could be a bit better.""Better integration with more platforms would be useful.""If an architecture is complex, the setup phase takes time.""Resolving problems in the Windows environment should be improved.""The stability could be improved.""The solution needs container compatibility.""Windows Server should lower pricing.""We encounter issues related to the product's UI when multiple users access the same machine."

More Windows Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are no licensing costs for CentOS."
  • "It is open-source, which means it is a free product. It has a one-time deployment cost."
  • "There is no license required for this solution."
  • "There is no price or licensing required — it's open-source."
  • "There are no licensing fees. CentOS is a free solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees for CentOS."
  • "We are using a subscription-based license option for CentOS."
  • "CentOS is a free solution."
  • More CentOS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Microsoft is relatively inexpensive compared to other database platforms."
  • "This is not an expensive product."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • "In our case, we primarily use Microsoft, so the cost is a lot less. But some of our customers have spent approximately $12,000 a year on the operating system license."
  • "The license model needs improvement."
  • "Our current license is an enterprise license agreement which gives you a whole lot of possibility, especially when you go through an R&D process. For example, you can provision everything, spread the service use over six months, and then wrap it up. It gives you a lot of flexibility."
  • "The Windows Server standard edition is affordable."
  • "We pay yearly for a license. If you ask any vendor they will tell you that it could be cheaper."
  • More Windows Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has… more »
    Top Answer:CentOS is very easy to use, and all the commands are user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The tool supports many applications.
    Top Answer:The administration interface should be more user-friendly. Some parts of the administration interface have been upgraded, while others are old-fashioned. The vendor must update everything with the… more »
    Top Answer:I used the solution for my file server, music server, and document management system.
    Ranking
    Views
    13,755
    Comparisons
    13,626
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    19,275
    Comparisons
    14,618
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    CentOS is a versatile operating system with many use cases, including virtual spaces, scientific computing, data center servers, web-based applications, and more. Its valuable features include customization options, low memory consumption, performance, scalability, open-source nature, cost-saving, and compatibility with Red Hat packages. 

    The solution has helped organizations save money on licensing and improve testing capabilities for new implementations without spending additional resources. CentOS is a stable, reliable, and efficient operating system that is easy to use and integrate with other applications and services.

    Windows Server is a versatile solution for various tasks, including domain control, virtualization, hosting applications, databases, managing user accounts in Active Directory, file sharing, and remote server access. It is also used for endpoint security, running ERP systems, and supporting business applications such as SAP and Microsoft Dynamics. 

    The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure and install, with technical support available. Windows Server is widely used and trusted. It has helped organizations by offering a domain controller and domain service, allowing them to sell products with Microsoft and keep processes running 24/7 without downtime.

    Reviews from Real Users

    There are a number of characteristics that make Windows Server an extremely effective solution. Two major ones are its inherent flexibility and its user-friendly nature.

    PeerSpot user Antonio D., a sales manager at INFOSEC, takes note of Windows Server 2016’s flexibility when he writes, “The product is a good operating system. The features fit our needs very well. For example, with Windows Server, you can use a machine for printing, accessing the internet, or using some applications. You can do it all with one server. You don't need several servers. One is enough.”

    Himanshu T., a system administrator and DevOps engineer at a tech-services company, takes note of the various way in which Windows Server 2016 is easy to use when he writes, “This solution is very user friendly, easy to use for any system administrator, simple to deploy applications, has a wide range of applications available, great UI, and takes less technical skills to operate than some other competitors. Additionally, the active directory has great functionality; if we want to integrate any assets, then we can easily do it.”

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Rakuten, Rackspace, Tyco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Educational Organization10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    CentOS vs. Windows Server
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS vs. Windows Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Windows Server is ranked 4th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 180 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Windows Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server writes "Easy to setup, stable and caters to my wide range of use cases but lacks user-friendly interface". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap, whereas Windows Server is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows 10, Oracle Linux and Windows 11. See our CentOS vs. Windows Server report.

    See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

    We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.