Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Automic Automation Logo

Automic Automation Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.2 out of 5

What is Automic Automation?

Featured Automic Automation reviews

Automic Automation mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Automic Automation in the Workload Automation category stands at 7.3%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Automic Automation7.3%
Control-M16.3%
AutoSys Workload Automation8.9%
Other67.5%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Automic Automation reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAutomic Automation vs Control-MDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAutomic Automation vs JAMSDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAutomic Automation vs AutoSys Workload AutomationDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.316.3%98%149 interviewsAdd to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4.06.0%92%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise57
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business320
Midsize Enterprise133
Large Enterprise782
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Retailer
5%
Performing Arts
5%
University
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Government
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Media Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Construction Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Non Profit
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%

Compare Automic Automation with alternative products

Learn more about Automic Automation

Automic Automation customers

Related questions

 
Automic Automation Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Consultant at Tricise4.0I am a Broadcom partner and use Automic Automation for both internal tasks and customer projects to automate business processes, especially financial ones. Its standout features are wide platform support and a consistent user interface. Recent licensing changes need attention.
Senior IT specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees3.5We use Automic Automation primarily to automate manual tasks for clients, with scripting as a notable feature. While it's powerful, clients desire workflow printing and find the pricing model costly. However, it saves around 30% time for clients.
Technical Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0I use Automic Automation as our enterprise scheduling software because it's intuitive and easy to use. While reporting capabilities need improvement, migrating from TWS effectively met our needs, although initial deployment involved some trial and error.
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0As a systems administrator, I use Automic Automation to maintain server operations without interruptions, benefiting from its high availability. While it reduces workload failures by about 50%, improvements in support and incident management are needed.
Sr Technical Services Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees4.0We use Automic Automation for ETL and batch processes, benefiting from its flexibility to handle complex business tasks. However, its enhancement process lacks transparency, and it's less effective for real-time tasks. Pricing consistency and support-based costs need improvement.
Principal Applications Development at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Automic Automation for scheduling cloud and on-premises jobs. Its scheduling feature is user-friendly, but it could improve by offering more control over schedules. We transitioned from Appworx to Automic due to Broadcom ownership.
Senior Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees5.0We use Automic Automation primarily for plant activity, billing, and finance automation. Its efficient GUI, predictive modeling, and comprehensive features have improved job execution and reduced operational costs, despite manual user migration and resource confirmation issues. The ROI is positive.
Senior Workload Automation Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees4.0I primarily use Automic for IT process automation, including file transfers and job automation across platforms like Linux and Windows. Its intuitive user interface facilitates workflow design, though complex dependencies could benefit from a visual dependency chart for easier management.