Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Silk Test Logo

OpenText Silk Test Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5

What is OpenText Silk Test?

Featured OpenText Silk Test reviews

OpenText Silk Test mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Silk Test1.7%
Tricentis Tosca12.0%
BrowserStack6.8%
Other79.5%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Silk Test reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsMar 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs Tricentis ToscaMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs BrowserStackMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs Worksoft CertifyMar 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.112.0%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.06.2%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise51
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Computer Software Company
4%
Non Profit
3%
Construction Company
3%
Government
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Leisure / Travel Company
2%
University
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
 
OpenText Silk Test Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura4.0I use OpenText Silk Test for manual, functional, and performance testing, particularly for ERP data loading. It supports complete test cycles, accelerates testing, and offers excellent cross-browser capabilities. While beneficial, its pricing could be improved. I've previously used Tricentis.
Manager QA at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0No summary available
Director of Engineering at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees3.5No summary available
IT Service Delivery Manager Testing and RPA at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use Silk Test for regression and automation testing, valuing its reduced workload and easy recording. Deployment is fast, though I desire better feature documentation and improved iOS automation. Overall, I recommend this scalable solution with good support.
Director Consulting Expert at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use this for performance testing and capacity planning, appreciating its good statistics and detailed reports. Stability and support are strong. However, identifying issues is very manual, and it needs better monitoring. I recommend it, rating it 8/10.
IT Programme Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees2.5I use this for web automation, valuing Silk4J and good scalability. However, it lacks compatibility, has unclear test management, and needs better API integration and stability. I rate it 5/10, requiring significant improvement.
Solutions Architect at MTN3.5I find Microsoft Silk Test very stable and user-friendly with easy reporting, primarily for network performance testing. However, the pricing is a significant issue, and I'd like better integration in future versions. I rate it 7/10.
Director at Traydaht ltd3.5I value Visual Studio integration and solution stability with good support. However, I find object library integration and some functions clunky, while the user community is small, demanding a learning curve for this powerful tool.