OpenText Silk Test vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #22, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 2.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,642 Views
2,804 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

24,024 Views
14,895 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

OpenText Silk Test and Tricentis Tosca are rivals in the software testing market. Tricentis Tosca has the edge due to its comprehensive features, while OpenText Silk Test is noted for its pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Silk Test offers advanced test automation and multi-platform support, including a user-friendly interactive interface and a scripting language adaptable for various languages. Tricentis Tosca provides continuous testing with no scripting required, extensive platform integration, and detailed analytics for comprehensive testing solutions.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve by enhancing its integration capabilities with more third-party tools, expanding its mobile testing options, and offering more detailed analytics. Tricentis Tosca would benefit from streamlining its initial setup process, improving resource usage efficiency, and expanding documentation for easier user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test is known for its rapid deployment and effective technical support, though Tricentis Tosca offers smoother integration within existing ecosystems, with robust support structures ensuring high satisfaction levels.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test's competitive pricing makes it accessible for smaller teams, promising quick returns, while Tricentis Tosca, despite a higher initial cost, offers superior ROI through its expansive feature set, benefiting enterprises focusing on long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,817 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 9.4%, down from 18.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	9.4%
OpenText Silk Test	2.1%
Other	88.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"It is a fine product; it is a powerful tool, and it needs commitment."

"It speeds up testing efforts."

"Using this DLL functionality we were able to automate our product."

"With the help of SilkTest we've automated a bunch of routine regression tests, thus we saved our testing team weeks of testing time."

"The statistics that are available are very good, the solution offers very good detailed reports, and it's excellent for testing an application's performance levels."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy."

"It was very apparent that Tosca was an all-in-one solution because we could do database testing, UI, and API testing, while the other tools we evaluated each focused on only one area."

"This solution allows you to create an entire automated framework where it allows you to easily manage everything in one place."

"The reporting is really nice."

"The amazing features provided by Tricentis takes automation to a different world and it's fun working with it."

"The solution can be deployed in DevOps and ERP environments like Oracle Fusion. It accelerates testing with the libraries. The product incorporates libraries and is more sensitive to the scans."

"The most valuable feature is the UI-based interface for building modules and turning modules into test cases."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps, and it is also a product that can be used by business people."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"Need to improve online documentation, community and forums to share issues encountered and solutions."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"At that time, we never had good technical support in Bangalore."

"The pricing could be improved."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"The only thing I am not happy about is not so much the product, but it's that we don’t a good way to control licenses."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."

"Do not buy this tool if you simply need a driver for your automation, as open source solutions (e.g. Selenium), or technology specific solutions are more suitable here."

"The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic."

"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."

"Some issues with stability, but those are minor errors."

"I would like to see something in terms of AI capabilities."

"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"Tosca is expensive. I don't see small and medium customers going for it. It's always large enterprises that have a big pocket. It is very expensive as compared to the other tools that we have in the market. They should reduce the price by half, and if they do that, they would do better business. From the competition perspective, other solutions are at a pretty similar level. UiPath is also very expensive. One thing that I always wanted was a short-term consumption license. With Tricentis, the biggest challenge is that you have to go for a minimum of one year license, and they also try to sell you a three-year license. It would be good if people can get a three-month or four-month consumption license."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

September 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.