Eggplant Test vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

5,927 Views
3,793 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,255 Views
2,181 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Eggplant Test are competitors in the automation testing tools category. While OpenText Silk Test is favored for its comprehensive feature set and testing capabilities, Eggplant Test is notable for its innovative approach and ease of use.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides extensive features like cross-browser testing, load testing, and integration with other OpenText solutions, catering to broad testing requirements. It supports distributed test runs and Java or C# test scripting through its Open Agent. Eggplant Test focuses on intelligent automation, featuring advanced image recognition and OCR technology. It offers user-centric testing through AI-driven capabilities and supports various platforms with its Digital Automation Intelligence.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could streamline its complex interface and reduce deployment intricacies for faster onboarding. Enhancing support for newer technologies and providing better mobile testing could increase its applicability. Eggplant Test might improve its OCR functionality for finer accuracy. Enhancing documentation and providing more examples could assist new users. Its pricing structure could be more transparent for better market competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test follows a traditional deployment model which can be complex in extensive enterprise environments but includes dedicated setup support. Eggplant Test offers straightforward deployment with user-friendly tools and responsive support, facilitating quicker adoption with minimal setup issues.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test presents higher upfront costs aligned with its extensive features, potentially achieving high ROI in long-term, complex projects. Eggplant Test provides flexible and competitive pricing beneficial for rapid projects or smaller businesses, offering significant ROI in environments where setup ease and adaptability are prioritized.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (10th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), Regression Testing Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.2%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	3.2%
OpenText Silk Test	2.0%
Other	94.8%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good text reading ability."

"Eggplant allowed us to replace that human work with an automated solution that reduced the time that it took a person to perform the test from upwards of three hours down to a few minutes, while increasing the accuracy to the levels where we are entirely accurate with our timing and tests."

"The solution is a stable one."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"It has definitely improved the quality of our software."

"This solution has helped our organization because we can create test cases faster as compared to using Selenium, there are no language dependencies and people are not required to be trained for two to five months."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

"Not many performance Testing tool provides end to end response times for scripts running on the page, this tool is capable of providing end to end real time browser response times."

"The statistics that are available are very good, the solution offers very good detailed reports, and it's excellent for testing an application's performance levels."

"The OCR recognition is great, way over Sikulix or Robot Framework."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

Cons

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"We were not able to write code as fast as with the competing open-source software, so that needs to be improved."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"There was no free trial in it."

"A step forward would be to have event support; supporting different events."

More Eggplant Test cons

"Need to improve online documentation, community and forums to share issues encountered and solutions."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex if you're deploying on-prem."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"SilkTest has to improve on Firefox and Chrome as their versions change."

"GUI interface could be simpler for non-developers."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"At the moment, when we are trying to use this tool, we are finding quite a few compatibility issues between the tool and the applications on the test. We wouldn't consider it perfectly stable for that reason."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

September 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Overview

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Silk Test report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.