OpenText Silk Test vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20, while Worksoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 2.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

4,080 Views
2,693 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 89 Worksoft Certify reviews

9,547 Views
6,396 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Worksoft Certify are competitors in the software testing automation market. Based on our data comparisons, Worksoft Certify seems to have an upper hand due to its advanced features and seamless integration capabilities with various enterprise ecosystems.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides robust cross-platform testing, script sharing across projects for enhanced test maintainability, and a strong object model for windows declarations. Worksoft Certify offers model-based testing, automated script generation, and the ability to perform end-to-end validation across application landscapes, which reduces manual testing efforts significantly.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in easing technical requirements for deployment, enhancing the speed of test execution, and expanding integration with non-traditional platforms. Worksoft Certify could benefit from refining its user interface further, reducing the complexity of automation setup for non-SAP applications, and optimizing documentation output to be less extensive while maintaining detail.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers straightforward installation but requires a certain level of technical knowledge offset by their reliable customer support. Worksoft Certify provides a seamless deployment experience with strong support services that guide users in fully leveraging its capabilities, offering an advantage in non-technical implementations.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is generally more budget-friendly with reasonable setup costs, providing substantial ROI for small to mid-scale businesses. Worksoft Certify, although more expensive initially, delivers a compelling ROI through efficient automation capabilities, facilitating long-term savings for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.0%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.0%
OpenText Silk Test	2.3%
Other	94.7%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using this DLL functionality we were able to automate our product."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"With the help of SilkTest we've automated a bunch of routine regression tests, thus we saved our testing team weeks of testing time."

"The OCR recognition is great, way over Sikulix or Robot Framework."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."

"It is a lot easier to maintain test scripts on Worksoft Certify than on other testing tools that we have had in the past."

"A significant positive impact is that Worksoft Certify requires no coding skills, unlike most other automation tools, as it is a codeless tool that anyone can easily learn and use for automation while also offering CTM to schedule suites and BPP to generate reports so we can develop end-to-end scripts, perform API testing, and conduct web automation across 29 supported interfaces including SAP GUI, S/4HANA, MS Office, Notepad, and PDF automation."

"On our last big SAP implementation project, we inserted an automation resource into the beginning of the project and, between automating regression processes, data staging, and using our automation to help repair cutover and conversion issues, we saved the project about $1,700,000."

"Automation is now part of our strategy."

"Worksoft Certify is cost-effective and provides a return on investment, bringing measurable benefits with time-saving, cost-saving, and resource-saving aspects."

"We were able to use Worksoft to automate all of the actions that we would have to take after an SAP refresh. This way we do the refresh, then that night or right afterwards, we run the Worksoft script and it resets all of our testing users. This sets them up with the right access, the right approvals, and just sets up everything on the back-end so we can do our scripts the next night."

"We save probably 50 percent of our time, the tool does what it's supposed to do, and we are able to actually work."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"At the moment, when we are trying to use this tool, we are finding quite a few compatibility issues between the tool and the applications on the test. We wouldn't consider it perfectly stable for that reason."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

"SilkTest has to improve on Firefox and Chrome as their versions change."

"Need to improve online documentation, community and forums to share issues encountered and solutions."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"I would like to know which version of Worksoft Certify is being used and how the tools are going to work."

"Worksoft Certify's support team should respond more promptly when we are stuck with certain issues and looking for a solution."

"The only thing I don't like - and this is the only complaint I usually have for Worksoft - is that the first-level support is not always the best for working on topics."

"The product had some UI issues."

"For the couple of the issues that we were really scratching our heads over, we were in communication with the technical support several times, but they never got back to us."

"The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me."

"From the features perspective, I find that there are functionalities missing in Worksoft Certify at the moment that I would like to see included in the future."

"Small changes in the HTML page design can impact the automation process, unlike SAP, where the script remains stable unless there is a functional change."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time."

"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."

"I'm not aware of any licensing costs for Worksoft Certify."

"It saves us time: approximately 50 percent."

"Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product."

"It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment."

"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."

"The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I am not certain about the pricing of Worksoft Certify. What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

Based on my experience working in Worksoft Certify and this web application, there are several things that do not work as expected in Worksoft.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 11% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

October 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

October 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation with seamless SAP integration, enhancing testing efforts. Its efficient onboarding and minimal maintenance support end-to-end testing for fast integration and updates.

Worksoft Certify is designed for codeless automation that streamlines SAP and application integration, providing significant time savings and increased process reusability. With a user-friendly interface, Worksoft Certify supports comprehensive testing, leveraging Capture and LiveTouch features to enhance documentation. The modular test framework and automatic report generation optimize efficiency, while the ability to test across applications diminishes manual efforts, increasing productivity within SAP environments.

What are Key Features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Allows easy testing without extensive coding.
SAP Integration: Ensures smooth connection with SAP systems.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive application testing.
Process Reusability: Enhances efficiency through repeatable test processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies the testing experience for all users.
Automatic Report Generation: Offers quick insights into test outcomes.

What Benefits and ROI Should You Consider?

Time Savings: Reduces the duration of testing cycles.
Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual workload while increasing accuracy.
Faster Onboarding: Enables swift adoption by new users.
Enhanced Productivity: Boosts efficiency across SAP-related tasks.

Worksoft Certify is deployed widely in industries where SAP-related testing is crucial, helping companies automate functional and regression testing in SAP systems. It supports end-to-end testing for web-based platforms like ServiceNow and aids in automating tasks and migrating SAP S/4HANA environments. Companies value it for reducing manual efforts and accelerating testing of critical business processes.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

October 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.