Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is AWS WAF?

Featured AWS WAF reviews

AWS WAF mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of AWS WAF in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 6.4%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS WAF6.4%
Fortinet FortiWeb8.2%
F5 Advanced WAF8.0%
Other77.4%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on AWS WAF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Dec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Fortinet FortiWebDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAFDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Imperva Application Security PlatformDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.21.7%98%113 interviewsAdd to research
Imperva Application Security Platform4.37.5%95%133 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 28, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business246
Midsize Enterprise124
Large Enterprise606
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
3%
University
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Agriculture
1%

Compare AWS WAF with alternative products

Learn more about AWS WAF

AWS WAF customers

Related questions

 
AWS WAF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC4.0I've used AWS WAF for four years to block unauthorized access, finding custom regex rules valuable, though monitoring and bot detection need improvement; setup is manageable, but DDoS protection requires an additional solution.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I’ve used AWS WAF for over five years to block malicious traffic and IPs, finding it scalable, stable, and cost-effective, though the dashboard needs improvement. Its automation and managed rules significantly enhance my application’s security and performance.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use AWS WAF on our websites as part of our data protection strategy due to its seamless integration and ease within the AWS platform. Despite improvements needed in signature sets and limited stateful capabilities, it effectively enhances security and saves resources.
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech3.5I use AWS WAF for its cloud-native functionality, ease of rule management, and better control within AWS infrastructure, though its dashboarding and metric functionalities need improvement. Previously, we switched from Imperva to AWS for cost optimization.
Associate Vice President - Engineering at Fedo.ai4.5I use AWS WAF for monitoring incoming calls and enhancing security by filtering web app traffic. Its ability to prevent attacks like SQL injection is valuable, though documentation could be simpler. AWS enhances customer satisfaction and security.
AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at Capgemini4.0I manage infrastructure on AWS using services like KMS, EBS, and WAF version two. AWS WAF's automation in blocking security threats is valuable, though integrating with services like Kafka could be improved. While it can be costly, its security benefits are worth it.
Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven4.5I use AWS WAF to protect our retail application from various attacks, including bot attacks and SQL injection. While it's effective, the pricing could be better, and it doesn't support adding multiple rules within its CPU.
IT Project Manager at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute In India5.0I implemented AWS WAF to manage global web traffic and enhance security against hacking. While it effectively filters requests, the reporting needs improvement for easier management understanding. Despite AWS WAF's capabilities, I prefer Fortinet for its ease of use and deployment.