Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
PeerSpot user
Product Manager ( HP EG Enterprise ) at Ingram Micro
  • 12
  • 9

Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?

Imperva WAF and Barracuda, which one is better?

PeerSpot user
5 Answers
07 December 16

To prevent OWASP TOP 10 (SQL Injection, XSS, XSFR...etc) attacks, stop L7 DDoS like SlowLoris and HeavyURL, protect against web fraud, phishing and endpoint malware (Dridex) on endpoint machines outside administrative control, secure application API's, the option to deploy as a managed service in the cloud and available on premises, use DAST integration for policy building with Qualys, Cenzic, Appscan and Whitehat, as well as at the same time provide market leading encryption support for the latest ECC cyphers, network firewalling, Identity and Access Management, Forward Proxy, Global and Local load balancing, DDoS mitigation on premises and in the cloud from layers 3-7 there really can be only one vendor. F5

PeerSpot user
Senior Product Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
07 December 16

Really depends on your requirement, budget and IT resources you have. If you are after an advanced WAF, imperva is the clear winner in my opinion. Comprehensive feature set, quite matured. But you will need proper training and experience to manage and get the best out of it. Mind you they are the only leader in Gartner MQ. But the price tag can be high. If you are looking for another good contender, look at Radware AppWall. Their product is good and the fully managed service offering is ideal for someone who has no expertise in WAF, in day today managing and making sure the rule set is optimized.

BTW Like any security solution, WAF is also as good as how well it is tuned. Specially if you plan to put it inline, make sure you not only consider the product, but a good service partner too.

it_user523575 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees
07 December 16

They're both great products that provides WAF services at the top of their class and hence not better but more suitable in different scenarios. It all comes down to the environment you wish to deploy those into, the scale of the web services which you will be protecting, the ratio of dynamic pages to static ones, the volume of traffic, the location of your customers/end-users and finally the cost (e.g. you may need to load balance over a few Barracudas to accomplish the same throughput provided by Imperva)

PeerSpot user
President at a tech services company
07 December 16

Barracuda is deployed in a pinch, but is very clearly a "conformity" WAF. Imperva's is a fulll fledge WAF, very complete, with a lot of granularity and reporting. Imperva's solution requieres a long, costly deployment. Both companies target very different market segments.

PeerSpot user
Sr Director of Sales Nordics, Russian Federation, Eurasia & CiS at NBC AB
07 December 16

Today i would say Barracuda is the better WAF based on that Imperva Dev slowed down over the last two years and the customers give bad feedback on the support, but there is a newer generation of WAF´s in the market that is better than Imperva and Barracuda, both in performance and price, PT application firewall, the only visionary in the GMQ

Related Questions
Rajan K - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Manager at Novac Technology Solutions
Sep 08, 2021
Hello, At the moment, I'm doing research about WAFs and I'd like to get your inputs on which product is better in terms of features and application security control: F5 WAF or Barracuda WAF. Thanks for the help!
See 1 answer
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
08 September 21
Hi @Manjil Bhetwal, @Maged Magdy, @Muhammed-Shafi, @Wealie Antar, @Igor-Bashtovyi , @Maksym Krutovertsev, @Georges Samaha, @Nguyen The Huy ​ and @Shiran Cohen. Can you please share your professional expertise with the community? Thanks!
it_user362526 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Jan 06, 2016
Wanted to get some firsthand input on Fortinet vs Sophos and how seamless the transition from TMG was. Sophos: Has anyone transitioned/migrated on to the new Sophos XG Platform (a combination of the Astaro and Cyberoam) yet, if so are all the TMG replacement technologies still present on the new platform? Are we better off sticking to the current tried and true UTM 9 offering or jump onboard ...
2 out of 13 answers
PeerSpot user
Security Expert at a financial services firm
29 December 15
Most definitely Fortinet been far longer involved in the firewall business than SOPHOS better maturity and functionality.
PeerSpot user
CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
29 December 15
There are many arguments for choosing Stonegate.
Download Free Report
Download our free Imperva Web Application Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.