Acunetix Reviews

Name: Acunetix
Brand: Invicti
Rating: 3.9 (33 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

33 reviews
86% willing to recommend

What is Acunetix?

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Get the Acunetix Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix, SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab and more!

Acunetix is the #6 ranked solution in top DevSecOps solutions, #13 ranked solution in AST tools, #16 ranked solution in application security solutions, and #22 ranked solution in top Vulnerability Management solutions. PeerSpot users give Acunetix an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Acunetix is most commonly compared to SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube): Acunetix vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube). Acunetix is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.

Helped 861,490 peers since 2012

Featured Acunetix reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

JanetMuhia

Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec

Just by scanning, Acunetix provides proof of exploit and gives the specific code affected. You can also see a categorized list of vulnerabilities. From there, you can easily create a report. It integrates with multiple tools in the CI/CD pipeline, like Jira and web application firewalls. Acunetix automation improved our customer's security testing process. By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process. This helps find vulnerabilities earlier rather than after the application is published.

Read full review

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Acunetix mindshare

Product category:

As of July 2025, the mindshare of Acunetix in the Application Security Tools category stands at 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Acunetix reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Security Tools	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs Veracode	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	Acunetix vs Checkmarx One	Jul 13, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	4.0	22.7%	81%	116 interviews Add to research
GitLab	4.2	2.7%	97%	85 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Acunetix's most valuable features include scheduling tests, a web-based GUI, and the IAS module for granular findings. Users value scan speed, vulnerability detection, comprehensive reporting, and low false positives. Scalability allows integration with multiple tools, and login sequence recording is convenient. The tool is user-friendly, easy to set up, and accommodates both cloud and on-premises use. Developers appreciate automated solutions, inventorying APIs, parameterized attacks, and efficient identification of vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."
"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."
"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

Room for Improvement

Acunetix users suggest improvements including enhancing the IAS tool, expanding database capabilities, and addressing false positives. They desire better reporting features and more robust integration with other platforms like GitHub. The interface and authentication processes require refinement. Users express concerns regarding the updated licensing model and pricing. There is a need for better mobile compatibility and faster scanning speeds. Users highlight a desire for differential scans and improved manual replication of issues.

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."
"I rate its stability six out of ten."
"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

ROI

Users indicate Acunetix leads to improved security processes, discovering hundreds of vulnerabilities. They acknowledge the difficulty in quantifying precise monetary benefits, yet renewals suggest perceived value. It reduces risk during application releases and saves considerable time by minimizing manual testing needs. In two years, ROI reached about 300%. Acunetix assists in preventing potential damage from cybersecurity threats, enhancing security and providing a strong justification for budget considerations.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating Acunetix frequently express concerns over its high pricing and complex licensing structure. Users noted that while initially competitive, costs have increased significantly, often requiring adjustments in their budgeting strategies. Acunetix employs an annual subscription model, with pricing influenced by the number of domains scanned. Although many find value in its features, some believe alternative products offer similar capabilities at lower prices. Organizations usually handle additional costs for support and renewal internally.

"The price is exceptionally high."
"The solution is expensive."
"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

Popular Use Cases

Acunetix is predominantly utilized for dynamic application security testing, scanning web vulnerabilities, and conducting penetration testing. Organizations employ it globally for application security and internal assessments. It's integrated for testing websites, internal apps, and customer-facing services, excelling in detecting vulnerabilities like SQL injections and cross-site scripting. Acunetix aids companies in meeting PCI DSS compliance by generating detailed reports. It's widely used for vulnerability assessments across networks, websites, and applications.

Service and Support

Acunetix customer service generally delivers responsive and helpful support, though some users mention delays and limited availability, especially outside 24-hour coverage seen from Malta. Many express satisfaction with the active and efficient technical team, though ticket responses can vary. There are instances where resellers act as intermediaries, enhancing the guidance. Users note that while support is satisfactory, occasional improvements are needed to speed up issue resolution and enhance training opportunities for complex matters.

Deployment

The initial setup of Acunetix is regarded as straightforward and uncomplicated by most users. They mention that deployment typically takes a short time, often within hours or days, depending on experience and complexity. Some note installation issues with Linux compatibility or upgrade processes. Challenges arise with on-premise hosting and cloud agent installation, requiring external support. Despite some needing additional assistance, users generally find the installation process intuitive and quick with Acunetix.

Scalability

Acunetix demonstrates satisfactory scalability, effectively supporting various deployment scales. Users highlight its adaptability in expanding environments, with ease of integrating multiple applications. Performance is generally efficient, although occasional adjustments may optimize larger, dynamic sites. Licensing considerations can impact scalability, yet cloud versions offer better flexibility. Acunetix is utilized by enterprises with diverse applications, indicating robust scalability for increased workloads.

Stability

Acunetix exhibits remarkable stability with minimal issues. Users highlight its consistent performance without significant service drops or unexpected downtimes. Challenges were noted during upgrades, but tech support resolves these promptly. Some minor glitches have been mentioned, but the stability receives high marks, often rated above eight out of ten. Maintenance is straightforward, often requiring minimal resources, and updates enhance performance. Users appreciate the reliability, with logs and reports consistently available without errors.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Acunetix Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.