Acunetix vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Invicti and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Invicti is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Invicti holds a 1.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Acunetix and Tenable are key competitors in the vulnerability management category. While Acunetix excels in web application capabilities, Tenable holds an advantage for enterprise-level needs due to its integration and scalability.

Features: Acunetix offers a web-based interface, powerful scheduling capabilities, and an Interactive Application Security Testing module. It provides comprehensive reporting, is easy to set up, and maintains a low false positive rate. Tenable boasts extensive integration options with third-party tools, strong cloud management features, and supports both on-premises and cloud environments. Its large vulnerability database enhances network security coverage, but it lacks some depth in web application scanning.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance tool support redundancy, lower false positives, and improve mobile environment integration. Manual replication capabilities and user interface flexibility are additional areas for improvement. Tenable could simplify its dashboards, reduce setup complexity, and offer better pricing structures. Speed in support response and application testing enhancements are also necessary improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is known for its simple deployment across various platforms, receiving positive customer service feedback with 24/7 support. Tenable provides a wide array of cloud options, praised for responsive technical support and accommodating feature requests. Acunetix maintains a strong lead with its user-friendly setup and customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's recent price increases necessitate a reassessment of its cost-effectiveness despite its high initial value. Tenable, although also costly, offers a pricing model tailored for large enterprises. Both tools deliver ROI through enhanced security posture and risk management, but a reevaluation of their pricing strategies is suggested for current market competitiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.9%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Acunetix is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 5.2%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"The product is really easy to use."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

More Acunetix pros

"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."

"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."

"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."

"The product is easy to use."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

More Acunetix cons

"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."

"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."

"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."

"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."

"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."

"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The price is exceptionally high."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetrati...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOp...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think I have any additional features to add for improvement, as Tenable Vulnerability Management does a prett...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 39% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

July 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

July 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

July 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

AcuSensor

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

July 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.