Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs SonarQube comparison

Invicti and SonarSource Sàrl are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.4, while SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Invicti holds a 2.5% mindshare in AS, compared to SonarSource Sàrl’s 19.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users who would recommend it.
Acunetix
Read 33 Acunetix reviews
  • 5,895 Views
  • 2,889 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
SonarQube
Read 134 SonarQube reviews
  • 36,807 Views
  • 23,925 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

Acunetix and SonarQube compete in the realms of security and quality assurance. Acunetix leads in security testing, with its advanced features and insights into vulnerabilities, while SonarQube is preferred for its comprehensive code quality analysis and code integration features.

Features: Acunetix provides robust scheduling for automated scans, Interactive Application Security Testing that reveals application vulnerabilities, and flexible reporting in diverse environments. SonarQube offers extensive support for multiple languages, seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, and customizable, plugin-rich dashboards beneficial for larger teams.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs to refine its licensing model, improve manual vulnerability replication, and reduce false positives. Enhancing database support for new OWASP lists is also recommended. SonarQube's complex configuration and high false-positive rates in security assessments require attention. Users also suggest better integration with third-party tools and a boost in security scanning capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Acunetix and SonarQube offer on-premises and cloud deployment options. Acunetix faces critique for slow technical support, pushing users towards resellers for quicker service. SonarQube delivers responsive support, uses user feedback for improvement, and offers comprehensive documentation for ease of setup.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's pricing has seen increases, affecting its cost-effectiveness, though its users report positive ROI due to enhanced application security. SonarQube presents a cost-effective solution with its free community edition and valuable plugins, improving coding quality and efficiency, though its advanced features require a paid subscription.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. SonarQube Report (Updated: November 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. SonarQube
November 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Acunetix enhances security, reduces reliance on testers, lowers costs, and improves application security, offering strong ROI in budget discussions.
Sentiment score
7.1
SonarQube improves code quality and developer productivity, enhancing long-term efficiency and stability by integrating with CI/CD pipelines.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
It is easily integrable with the CI/CD pipeline and supports multiple projects with its extensive plugin options.
I have seen a return on the investment from SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the value it adds relates to static code analysis and vulnerability assessments needed for our FDA approval process.
We see productivity increasing based on the fact that the code review is mostly automated, allowing the developer to fix the code themselves before assigning it to someone else to review, thus receiving that ROI.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
AO
Archana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
KH
Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Acunetix customer service is responsive but not 24/7, with mixed reviews on support speed and issue resolution.
Sentiment score
6.2
SonarQube support receives mixed reviews, with valuable community resources but limited direct support interaction noted by users.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
The technical support from Acunetix is quite good
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
The community support is quite effective.
The customer service and support for SonarQube Cloud are responsive and helpful.
Integrating it into different solutions is straightforward.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
AO
SW
DB
Archana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
RG
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Acunetix offers scalable, flexible scanning for varying environments, with licensing and performance as key factors impacting scalability.
Sentiment score
7.0
SonarQube effectively scales across environments, handling multiple repositories, though performance may lag with large codebases, proving its versatility.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
There are limitations, and it seems to have fewer capabilities than Veracode.
It has been used in multiple projects and performs well.
I would rate the scalability of SonarQube Server as a 10 because we can configure the server to scan multiple projects based on the number of lines.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
reviewer2356089 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer933816 - PeerSpot reviewer
KH
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Acunetix boasts remarkable stability with minimal maintenance, reliable performance, consistent results, and few bugs or disruptions reported.
Sentiment score
7.7
SonarQube is highly stable, with minor issues largely related to configuration, achieving user stability ratings between seven and ten.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
I think SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is stable, and we did not face any problems unless there was a power outage or if the LAN cable was plugged out.
From my team's feedback, it is almost an eight out of ten.
It is a quite stable solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
KH
reviewer2356089 - PeerSpot reviewerArchana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Acunetix users seek improvements in IAST, database, authentication, pricing, scan limits, mobile support, tool integration, and report customization.
SonarQube struggles with slow analysis, complex setup, inadequate security, language rule issues, and needs better DevOps integration.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
I would like to see SonarQube Cloud provide more detailed solutions for fixing code issues, especially solutions related to CVEs.
I need a solution that can bring together three key areas: vulnerabilities, static scanning, and misarchitecture.
Static code analysis is good, but the product lacks dynamic code scanning capabilities, an area where Veracode excels.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
AO
Archana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
RG
reviewer933816 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Acunetix pricing is considered expensive, ranging $3,000-$500,000, influenced by domains and features, requiring careful evaluation.
SonarQube provides free and paid versions, with licensing based on code lines; costs vary by features and support.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
I would rate the pricing for SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as an 8, where 1 is very cheap and 10 is very expensive, because Coverity is very expensive, and while SonarQube is not cheap, it is still less expensive than Coverity.
They always offer around a two-year contract, but we always take a one-year contract because it's expensive.
The freemium version of SonarQube Server offers excellent value, especially compared to the high costs of Snyk.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
AO
SW
KH
Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
DB
 

Valuable Features

Acunetix provides efficient vulnerability scanning with integration capabilities, accurate reporting, and is user-friendly, scalable, and low-maintenance for teams.
SonarQube excels with comprehensive language support, customization, integration, and security features, offering user-friendly dashboards and community-driven enhancements.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report
Some of the static code analysis capabilities are the most beneficial.
I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially.
It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives.
For more quotes and insights, download the SonarQube report
SW
KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
AO
DB
reviewer2356089 - PeerSpot reviewerArchana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
14th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (25th), DevSecOps (6th)
SonarQube
Ranking in Application Security Tools
1st
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
134
Ranking in other categories
Software Development Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube is 19.3%, down from 25.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)19.3%
Acunetix2.5%
Other78.2%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy
Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.
Read full review
Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support
The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise79
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is automated scanning and detection of security vulnerabilities in web applications, websites, and APIs.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...
See all answers
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix Logo
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix
Compared 16% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix
Compared 8% of the time
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix Logo
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix
Compared 7% of the time
Invicti vs Acunetix Logo
Invicti vs Acunetix
Compared 7% of the time
Veracode vs Acunetix Logo
Veracode vs Acunetix
Compared 5% of the time
More Acunetix Competitors
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube
Compared 22% of the time
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Logo
Coverity Static vs SonarQube
Compared 9% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube
Compared 9% of the time
Snyk vs SonarQube Logo
Snyk vs SonarQube
Compared 7% of the time
Semgrep vs SonarQube Logo
Semgrep vs SonarQube
Compared 6% of the time
More SonarQube Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Acunetix
November 2025
Acunetix reportDownload Acunetix product report
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube
October 2025
SonarQube reportDownload SonarQube product report
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
Sonar, SonarQube Cloud
 

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

SonarQube provides comprehensive support for multi-language development, custom coding rules, and quality gates, integrated seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines. It empowers teams with clear insights through intuitive dashboards, identifying vulnerabilities, code smells, and technical debt.

SonarQube is renowned for its extensive capabilities in static code analysis, making it an invaluable tool for maintaining code quality. By fully integrating into development processes, it allows organizations to manage vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with coding standards. Its extensive community and open-source roots contribute to its accessibility, while robust dashboards facilitate code quality monitoring. Despite its strengths, feedback suggests enhancing analysis speed, better integration with DevOps tools, and refining the user interface. Users also point to the need for handling false positives effectively and expanding on AI-based features for dynamic code analysis.

What are SonarQube's main features?
  • Multi-language Support: Broad compatibility with diverse programming languages
  • Custom Coding Rules: Flexible customization of coding standards
  • Quality Gates: Set thresholds for maintaining coding standards
  • Vulnerability Identification: Detects security and performance issues
  • Integration with CI/CD: Streamlines quality checks in development workflows
  • Open Source Access: Supported by an active developer community
  • Technical Debt Tracking: Identifies and manages coding inefficiencies
What benefits should users expect?
  • Enhanced Code Quality: Improve code reliability and maintainability
  • Security Assurance: Identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities
  • Reduced Technical Debt: Streamline the process of managing poor coding practices
  • Development Efficiency: Facilitates continuous integration and delivery processes
  • Community Support: Leverages an active network for continual improvements

In industries like finance and healthcare, SonarQube aids in obtaining regulatory compliance through rigorous code quality assessments. It is implemented to enhance cybersecurity by identifying potential vulnerabilities, while ensuring code meets the stringent standards demanded in these fields. As part of a broader development ecosystem, its integration in CI/CD pipelines ensures smooth and efficient software delivery, catering to phases from code inception to deployment, effectively supporting large-scale and critical software applications.

SonarSource Sàrl
 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. SonarQube
November 2025
Free Report: Acunetix vs. SonarQube
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Acunetix vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.