Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 2.3% |
| SonarQube | 13.6% |
| Checkmarx One | 8.8% |
| Other | 75.3% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SonarQube | 4.0 | 13.6% | 84% | 136 interviewsAdd to research |
| Snyk | 4.1 | 5.1% | 100% | 51 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 189 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 108 |
| Large Enterprise | 318 |
Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.
What are Acunetix's main features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.
Acunetix was previously known as AcuSensor.
Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used Acunetix for over five years to scan web applications efficiently, appreciating its detailed reports and centralized dashboard, though support and duplicate findings need improvement; overall, it saves time and supports compliance effectively. |
| Lead Cybersecurity at TBO | 3.5 | I've used Acunetix primarily for application security and found it effective and affordable, though false positives remain a concern. It's reliable, scalable, and saves time over manual assessments, especially with authenticated and continuous scanning features. |
| Team Lead, Application Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Acunetix (now Invicti) to scan web apps; cloud speed, bulk CSV uploads, scheduling, continuous and comparative scans, and comprehensive emailed reports save me time. Support is responsive, but pricing is higher than alternatives. I want automated API scanning via Swagger/JSON; I rate it 8/10. |
| CEO at Xcelliti | 4.5 | I use Acunetix primarily for penetration and security testing, benefiting from its efficient vulnerability detection, minimal false positives, and excellent integration capabilities. Improvements needed include reducing false positives and enhancing integration with newer tools like GitHub. |
| Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem | 4.5 | I use Acunetix primarily for penetration testing and find it comprehensive for web applications, supporting manual interventions and specific scenarios like CAPTCHA. It saves us time by covering attack surfaces, though I’ve encountered some update issues. |
| Head of Operations, Supply Chain at Lyreco Deutschland GmbH | 3.0 | Acunetix is user-friendly and beneficial for security engineers, enabling quick learning and effective application scanning and report generation. However, the deployment process needs improvement, particularly in creating proxy connections, and it's better suited for smaller companies compared to competitors. |
| Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World | 3.5 | I use Acunetix primarily to identify client vulnerabilities. Its best feature is its ability to identify vulnerabilities effectively, though there are some notable false positives. Improvements in partnering are needed, but it has enhanced our security posture. |
| Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec | 4.5 | As a consultant company, we find the interactive transaction feature of Acunetix particularly valuable, along with its API inventory capabilities. However, pricing needs improvement compared to Tenable, which offers better integration and bundling of tools. |