

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Tines are both highly regarded in the cybersecurity sector. Tines is preferred for its advanced automation capabilities, while Cybereason stands out for its comprehensive threat protection features.
Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for its detailed threat detection, robust investigation capabilities, and comprehensive threat protection. Tines is valued for its advanced automation functions, streamlined task management, and ease of use in automating repetitive tasks.
Room for Improvement: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response could benefit from better integration with other security tools, enhanced reporting features, and a more intuitive user interface. Tines needs improvements in reporting capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and more detailed documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Tines has a more complex setup but is commended for its equally responsive support team.
Pricing and ROI: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a higher upfront cost but is considered worth the investment for its strong threat detection. Tines is more cost-effective, especially for organizations focused on automation, offering a quicker ROI.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response | 1.1% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 9.1% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 7.9% |
| Other | 81.9% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tines | 6.2% |
| Microsoft Sentinel | 13.0% |
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.9% |
| Other | 71.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.
Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.
Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.
What are the most important features of Tines?Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.