No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs OpenText Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 28.6%, down from 36.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Service Virtualization is 14.8%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.1%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization28.6%
OpenText Service Virtualization14.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.1%
Other44.49999999999999%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Marco Technology
Is scalable and easy to use, but the monitoring feature needs improvement
The support for Micro Focus Service Virtualization is better than that for other products. The technical support staff are highly skilled. Sometimes, we don't have to open a ticket. We can just go into the community and then talk to them directly. I would rate technical support at seven out of ten.
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"Some of the virtual services that have been built by this solution will support somewhere around 2000 to 3000GPS perfectly."
"Testing using Service Virtualization saved huge amounts."
"CA technical support and DevTest community people love to respond and come up with a number of suggestions, which is really appreciated."
"One of the things I like about it is it actually does what it claims to do."
"Having this tool as part of the organization gives thought to how individuals can efficiently remove dependencies and reduce time to market."
"Our supply chain applications became available for more than 70% of the time compared to 25% before we started using LISA."
"CA Service Virtualization is totally number one in the market, no one comes close to this."
"Service Virtualization cuts down dependency across dev as well as any third party components."
"We choose HPE servers because they're rock solid."
"It is easy to use, and the coding is easier to develop as well."
"The support for integration patterns and the ease of use to wizard-based utility is what I would consider the most important features for service virtualization platforms."
"With this solution, you don't have to use your production services for implementing other software uses."
"We have a number of end points in the environment that are not terribly reliable, and with Service Virtualization we can replace them with something that is much more stable while gaining commonality, a high level of compliance, and reducing the likelihood of different problems being caused by different issues in multiple test environments."
"Teams have reduced the amount of delayed development effort it takes to roll out a new product by leveraging a virtual service for development and then meeting up for a final integration test when it is complete."
"The purpose for this tool is very obvious and Micro Focus covers it very well."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
 

Cons

"I think the size of DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things."
"There were problems where it doesn't support the technology. We have to write custom functions ourselves."
"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."
"The REST test step could include other methods."
"There have been some issues with Service Virtualization, but I would have to ask the team for more specific details."
"IMS services in version 7.5.2 are quite unstable."
"Sometimes we need to develop in web services custom behaviors that simulate technically and functionally the real service."
"It does require a higher level of support. This is not the kind of tool that you can just haul off just go make decisions on."
"Pricing is always a concern for our clients, so my guess is if anything can be beat it's price."
"As it stands now, the debugging capacity within the tool is fairly limited."
"More support for different protocols. I would love to see more wizards rather than relying on some custom coding, which you can use C# as well as Visual Basic scripting. In the service virtualization platform, I would love to see more wizard features as well as the ability to connect to an external database, which by the way, we have put an enhancement request in for. I'd love to see that in the service virtualization platform."
"I would like them to reduce the cost of the licenses."
"I’m rating it a 7 because it is not a fully evolved virtualization tool compared to other tools offering the same service."
"Pricing is always a concern for our clients, so my guess is if anything can be beat it's price."
"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization."
"The data-driven model is painful at best."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."
"It's an expensive solution, but you can get discounts. You have to buy one server and one designer together, for example, and it may cost 15 million Thai Baht."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
10%
Transportation Company
7%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Micro Focus Service Virtualization, HPE Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Virgin Media, TTNet
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.