Broadcom Service Virtualization OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Broadcom Service Virtualization is the #1 ranked solution in top Service Virtualization tools. PeerSpot users give Broadcom Service Virtualization an average rating of 9.0 out of 10. Broadcom Service Virtualization is most commonly compared to Micro Focus Service Virtualization: Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Micro Focus Service Virtualization. Broadcom Service Virtualization is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 73% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 23% of all views.
What is Broadcom Service Virtualization?

CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

Broadcom Service Virtualization was previously known as ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization .

Broadcom Service Virtualization Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 

Broadcom Service Virtualization Video

Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization pricing:
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."

Broadcom Service Virtualization Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
MSP
Top 20Leaderboard
Download
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
Pros and Cons
  • "In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization."
  • "The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing.

Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients.

What is most valuable?

In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization.

What needs improvement?

The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using it in the current project for the last six months. It's deployed on the cloud.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It should be scalable.

How are customer service and support?

We had to reach out to technical support for some help regarding the TCP/IP virtualization, and we received good support from them and were able to implement the solution as per the planned timeline.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment is simple.

What about the implementation team?

It was deployed in the client's environment by the service provider.

What was our ROI?

Our clients have seen an ROI.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five.

What other advice do I have?

It is a very good tool with support for a variety of protocols and has a user-friendly UI and other scripting features as well. I will give it a rating of nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Read archived reviews (2+ years old)
Product Categories
Service Virtualization
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions: