Top 10 Splunk SOAR Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

50 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Top Splunk SOAR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, and Elastic Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk SOAR surpasses its competitors by offering advanced automation capabilities, rapid incident response, seamless integration across security tools, and comprehensive playbooks, empowering security teams to effectively streamline operations and reduce threat response times significantly.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Sentinel

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Sentinel

4.2 out of 5

Splunk SOAR excels in flexibility with third-party integrations, appealing to users prioritizing diverse tool compatibility. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel benefits from native Microsoft ecosystem integration, appealing to those seeking powerful analytics within a familiar cloud environment, complemented by cost predictability in its pricing model.

Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

QRadar offers extensive security monitoring with SIEM and NetFlow, providing rapid insights and integrations. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in automation and orchestration but faces integration complexities. QRadar is costly but delivers strong ROI, while Splunk SOAR's flexibility suits scalable cloud solutions.

Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar requires a significant initial setup investment, whereas Splunk SOAR offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a primary difference in their deployment expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar requires a significant initial setup investment, whereas Splunk SOAR offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a primary difference in their deployment expenses.

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

Elastic Security offers scalability, ease of data visualization, and flexibility with its open-source platform. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration with mature playbooks. Elastic attracts through cost-effectiveness, while Splunk appeals with comprehensive features despite higher costs.

Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.

AWS Security Hub

3.8 out of 5

AWS Security Hub

3.8 out of 5

Splunk SOAR is ideal for complex security automation and custom playbooks, offering broad integration options. In comparison, AWS Security Hub excels with AWS-native integrations and a cost-effective pricing model, making it suitable for organizations focused on AWS environments.

Download AWS Security Hub vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Splunk SOAR requires a significant initial investment, whereas AWS Security Hub typically offers a more affordable setup cost. The pricing distinctions highlight AWS's cost-effective approach compared to the higher expense associated with Splunk's comprehensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XSOAR is ideal for large enterprises seeking deep integrations and customizable automation, despite high costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's flexible user-based pricing may better serve diverse customer needs with strong integration, though it remains costly.

Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has moderate setup costs, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has moderate setup costs, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial expense.

Exabeam

3.9 out of 5

Exabeam

3.9 out of 5

Splunk SOAR excels with customizable playbooks and extensive integration flexibility, enhancing security operations. In comparison, Exabeam focuses on user behavior analytics and competitive pricing. Splunk SOAR suits those valuing integration, while Exabeam's cost-effectiveness and straightforward platform attract users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions.

Download Exabeam vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR tends to have a higher initial cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR tends to have a higher initial cost.

Tines

4.5 out of 5

Tines

4.5 out of 5

Splunk SOAR excels in complex environments with robust integration and automation capabilities. In comparison, Tines offers an easy-to-use, flexible workflow engine attractive for dynamic settings. Splunk's mature support suits enterprises, while Tines' rapid deployment fits agile organizations seeking quick returns.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. Tines Report

Pricing

Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which is known for its more affordable initial deployment expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which is known for its more affordable initial deployment expense.

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

4.2 out of 5

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

4.2 out of 5

ThreatConnect TIP attracts budget-conscious buyers with its in-depth threat data management and competitive pricing. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, known for advanced automation and extensive integration, appeals to organizations seeking comprehensive support and long-term ROI benefits from initial investments.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.

Sumo Logic Security

4.2 out of 5

Sumo Logic Security

4.2 out of 5

Sumo Logic Security focuses on real-time log monitoring and flexible dashboards, ideal for large enterprises seeking robust cloud solutions. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced automation and playbooks, appealing to organizations needing seamless security orchestration and broad deployment flexibility across environments.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. Sumo Logic Security Report

Pricing

Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR offers a comprehensive setup, potentially resulting in higher initial expenses. Their pricing reflects differing approaches to security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

ServiceNow Security Operations appeals to organizations needing deep IT integration, offering automated workflows and comprehensive support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides customizable security solutions with flexibility, suitable for varied environments and offering significant long-term ROI with a lower initial investment.

Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.