Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, and Elastic Security.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Splunk SOAR surpasses its competitors by offering advanced automation capabilities, seamless integration with diverse security tools, and an intuitive interface that enhances operational efficiency and response times.
Splunk Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Splunk SOAR excels in flexibility with third-party integrations, appealing to users prioritizing diverse tool compatibility. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel benefits from native Microsoft ecosystem integration, appealing to those seeking powerful analytics within a familiar cloud environment, complemented by cost predictability in its pricing model.
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
IBM Security QRadar excels in log management and rule-based customizability, offering robust threat detection and scalability for larger enterprises. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides automation with strong orchestration capabilities, making it suitable for managing workflows and integrating third-party tools efficiently.
IBM Security QRadar offers more affordable setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which tends to be higher. This cost difference highlights a key factor for businesses considering initial implementation expenses between the two solutions.
IBM Security QRadar offers more affordable setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which tends to be higher. This cost difference highlights a key factor for businesses considering initial implementation expenses between the two solutions.
Elastic Security offers scalability, ease of data visualization, and flexibility with its open-source platform. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration with mature playbooks. Elastic attracts through cost-effectiveness, while Splunk appeals with comprehensive features despite higher costs.
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Splunk SOAR is ideal for complex security automation and custom playbooks, offering broad integration options. In comparison, AWS Security Hub excels with AWS-native integrations and a cost-effective pricing model, making it suitable for organizations focused on AWS environments.
Splunk SOAR requires a significant initial investment, whereas AWS Security Hub typically offers a more affordable setup cost. The pricing distinctions highlight AWS's cost-effective approach compared to the higher expense associated with Splunk's comprehensive features.
Splunk SOAR requires a significant initial investment, whereas AWS Security Hub typically offers a more affordable setup cost. The pricing distinctions highlight AWS's cost-effective approach compared to the higher expense associated with Splunk's comprehensive features.
Cortex XSOAR is ideal for large enterprises seeking deep integrations and customizable automation, despite high costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's flexible user-based pricing may better serve diverse customer needs with strong integration, though it remains costly.
Splunk SOAR excels with customizable playbooks and extensive integration flexibility, enhancing security operations. In comparison, Exabeam focuses on user behavior analytics and competitive pricing. Splunk SOAR suits those valuing integration, while Exabeam's cost-effectiveness and straightforward platform attract users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions.
Splunk SOAR excels in complex environments with robust integration and automation capabilities. In comparison, Tines offers an easy-to-use, flexible workflow engine attractive for dynamic settings. Splunk's mature support suits enterprises, while Tines' rapid deployment fits agile organizations seeking quick returns.
ThreatConnect TIP attracts budget-conscious buyers with its in-depth threat data management and competitive pricing. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, known for advanced automation and extensive integration, appeals to organizations seeking comprehensive support and long-term ROI benefits from initial investments.
ServiceNow Security Operations appeals to organizations needing deep IT integration, offering automated workflows and comprehensive support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides customizable security solutions with flexibility, suitable for varied environments and offering significant long-term ROI with a lower initial investment.
Torq is used for automating workflows in cybersecurity, offering valuable features like integration flexibility and real-time alerts. It allows for simplified process management while room for improvement exists in documentation quality and advanced customization options.
Fortinet FortiSOAR offers cost-effective pricing and seamless Fortinet ecosystem integration, appealing to budget-conscious environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's extensive third-party integrations and robust features may justify higher costs, attracting those needing comprehensive security orchestration across diverse systems.
LogPoint offers effective logging, rapid setup, and AI-driven analytics at cost-effective pricing, appealing to those requiring straightforward deployment and budget predictability. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides superior automation, extensive integrations, and deployment flexibility, suiting businesses needing robust orchestration and integration diversity.
Swimlane attracts with simplicity and competitive pricing, fostering faster ROI through lower costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced analytics and comprehensive features, justifying its higher price for deeper security insights and scalability, appealing to those valuing extensive capabilities.
Google Security Operations excels in Google service integration, ideal for organizations within this ecosystem. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers vast automation and integration capabilities, appealing to those seeking flexible and comprehensive orchestration, despite potentially higher upfront costs.
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR entails a more complex deployment process and higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in upfront investment between the two solutions.
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR entails a more complex deployment process and higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in upfront investment between the two solutions.
IBM Resilient excels in incident response with dynamic playbooks and IBM QRadar integration. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers versatile integration and real-time problem-solving. A tech buyer might prefer IBM Resilient for its incident management or Splunk SOAR for its automation features.
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR requires a more detailed cost analysis, highlighting key differences in initial budgeting.
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR requires a more detailed cost analysis, highlighting key differences in initial budgeting.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator excels in cost-effectiveness and intuitive deployment within existing McAfee environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers superior automation and integration capabilities with diverse applications. Tech buyers prioritize McAfee for budget efficiency, while Splunk SOAR attracts those valuing advanced orchestration.
Splunk SOAR excels in automation efficiency, offering seamless integration and playbook execution. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on collaborative incident response and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those valuing enhanced team communication and a comprehensive security ecosystem.
InsightConnect excels in simplicity and automation, appealing to those who prioritize ease of use and integration flexibility. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers enhanced incident response through advanced analytics, making it ideal for those investing in comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
D3 Security offers cost-effective solutions with strong case management and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides extensive integration and analytics capabilities, justifying its higher price for tech buyers looking for advanced customization and a wide range of third-party integrations.
