No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Splunk SOAR Logo

Top 10 Splunk SOAR Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Splunk SOAR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and Elastic Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk SOAR surpasses its competitors by offering advanced automation capabilities, seamless integration with existing security tools, and a user-friendly interface that enhances efficiency and response times, making it a preferred choice for robust security operations.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers strong compliance monitoring and data insights. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration. Tech buyers might choose QRadar for cost-effectiveness, while Splunk SOAR could attract those needing robust customization and automation capabilities.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk SOAR Report
IBM Security QRadar typically has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk SOAR offers a more affordable upfront investment. This cost difference highlights the variance in budget considerations for organizations seeking security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk SOAR offers a more affordable upfront investment. This cost difference highlights the variance in budget considerations for organizations seeking security solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in automation and tool integration, making it ideal for dynamic security operations. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration and strong data ingestion, making it suitable for organizations leveraging Microsoft tools and requiring comprehensive security management.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR offers a more straightforward setup process, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup can be more time-consuming and complex, highlighting a significant contrast in their initial deployment experiences.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR offers a more straightforward setup process, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup can be more time-consuming and complex, highlighting a significant contrast in their initial deployment experiences.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security offers scalability, ease of data visualization, and flexibility with its open-source platform. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration with mature playbooks. Elastic attracts through cost-effectiveness, while Splunk appeals with comprehensive features despite higher costs.
Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in security automation with strong integrations and automated playbooks. In comparison, AWS Security Hub integrates well within AWS but lacks multi-cloud flexibility and extensive third-party tool support. Splunk’s community resources enhance deployment, while AWS offers affordability, especially for existing users.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR offers high initial setup costs, whereas AWS Security Hub provides a more budget-friendly setup. These pricing differences highlight Splunk SOAR's robust capabilities compared to AWS Security Hub's cost-efficient solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR offers high initial setup costs, whereas AWS Security Hub provides a more budget-friendly setup. These pricing differences highlight Splunk SOAR's robust capabilities compared to AWS Security Hub's cost-efficient solution.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR offers robust automation and incident lifecycle management, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in flexible integrations and user-friendly playbooks, appealing to customers seeking comprehensive pre-built options.
Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited budgets.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced UEBA, session building, and real-time incident analysis, appealing to those valuing affordability. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, with extensive integrations and flexible playbooks, suits buyers prioritizing integration richness and operational versatility despite higher costs.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Exabeam offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting a key pricing advantage. Splunk SOAR's setup is more expensive, which might impact budget-conscious organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting a key pricing advantage. Splunk SOAR's setup is more expensive, which might impact budget-conscious organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
4.3 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
4.3 out of 5

Torq enhances case management and security automation with AI-powered workflows for phishing, incident response, and employee onboarding. Integrating with tools like Zscaler and AWS GuardDuty, it offers a no-code interface for effortless automation. Despite some challenges in search and data management, its flexibility and efficiency make it a preferred choice for automation.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. Torq Report
View comparison
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download Splunk SOAR vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.1 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security focuses on real-time log monitoring and flexible dashboards, ideal for large enterprises seeking robust cloud solutions. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced automation and playbooks, appealing to organizations needing seamless security orchestration and broad deployment flexibility across environments.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR offers a comprehensive setup, potentially resulting in higher initial expenses. Their pricing reflects differing approaches to security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR offers a comprehensive setup, potentially resulting in higher initial expenses. Their pricing reflects differing approaches to security solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.4 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.4 out of 5
Splunk SOAR offers significant integration capabilities and pre-built playbooks for complex environments. In comparison, Tines features a no-code interface, enabling quick automation for agile teams. Splunk SOAR is ideal for large organizations, whereas Tines suits smaller teams with limited technical resources.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Tines Report
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which offers a more affordable initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which offers a more affordable initial expense.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint focuses on cost-effectiveness, dashboards, and ease of use, with smooth system integration. In comparison, Splunk SOAR enhances automation and orchestration with real-time analytics and endpoint security, despite higher costs, offering extensive integration and advanced features for incident management.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Logpoint's setup cost is often noted as reasonable and straightforward, while Splunk SOAR is frequently described as having a higher setup cost with added complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint's setup cost is often noted as reasonable and straightforward, while Splunk SOAR is frequently described as having a higher setup cost with added complexity.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Google Security Operations is cost-effective, offering easy deployment and robust support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides advanced capabilities with rich automation features. Google suits budget-conscious buyers, while Splunk attracts those needing comprehensive functionality for complex security environments.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher setup expenses but provides advanced automation features.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher setup expenses but provides advanced automation features.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.1 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP is renowned for detailed threat intelligence and seamless security tool integration. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in automation, streamlining incident response. ThreatConnect TIP offers competitive pricing and efficient deployment, while Splunk SOAR provides compelling ROI through advanced automation capabilities.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect TIP offers flexible setup cost options, whereas Splunk SOAR tends to be higher priced initially.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect TIP offers flexible setup cost options, whereas Splunk SOAR tends to be higher priced initially.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations integrates seamlessly with IT workflows, enhancing security management. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced automation and orchestration for incident response. ServiceNow suits those prioritizing IT service integration, while Splunk SOAR is ideal for those focusing on comprehensive automation.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
ServiceNow Security Operations has moderate setup costs, whereas Splunk SOAR requires significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations has moderate setup costs, whereas Splunk SOAR requires significant initial investment.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSOAR excels in cost-effectiveness and easy integration with Fortinet products, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Splunk SOAR attracts tech buyers seeking feature-rich solutions with advanced threat intelligence and extensive integrations, justifying higher investment for comprehensive security operations.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR requires a moderate setup cost, while Splunk SOAR has a higher initial expenditure. The distinction in setup costs is notable, with FortiSOAR offering a more economically accessible option compared to Splunk SOAR.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR requires a moderate setup cost, while Splunk SOAR has a higher initial expenditure. The distinction in setup costs is notable, with FortiSOAR offering a more economically accessible option compared to Splunk SOAR.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Swimlane offers appealing pricing and support options, making it attractive for cost-sensitive buyers. In comparison, Splunk SOAR’s advanced automation capabilities justify its higher price for those seeking comprehensive security features. Swimlane's ease of deployment contrasts with Splunk SOAR's complex, resource-intensive installation.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane's setup costs are reported as manageable compared to Splunk SOAR, which may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane's setup costs are reported as manageable compared to Splunk SOAR, which may have higher initial expenses.
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
IBM Resilient supports robust incident response, excelling in dynamic playbooks and extensive integrations, ideal for mature security ecosystems. In comparison, Splunk SOAR prioritizes playbook automation and integration flexibility, enhancing workflow efficiency. Both are priced for significant ROI but may challenge smaller organizations financially.
Download IBM Resilient vs. Splunk SOAR Report
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more complex pricing structure.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion
3.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in automation efficiency, offering seamless integration and playbook execution. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on collaborative incident response and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those valuing enhanced team communication and a comprehensive security ecosystem.
Download Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
Splunk SOAR Logo
ThreatQ
3.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
ThreatQ
3.5 out of 5
ThreatQ excels in integration capabilities, fostering interactions with diverse tools. In comparison, Splunk SOAR enhances efficiency with robust automation. ThreatQ is ideal for integration-focused environments, while Splunk SOAR appeals to those prioritizing extensive automation despite higher costs.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ Report
ThreatQ features a more straightforward setup cost structure compared to Splunk SOAR, which entails a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatQ features a more straightforward setup cost structure compared to Splunk SOAR, which entails a higher initial expense.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
4.0 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator excels in streamlined management and cost-effective pricing, making it ideal for those seeking simplified deployment and support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced automation and customization, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security features despite a higher initial investment.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report
The setup cost for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is notably lower than Splunk SOAR, offering a more budget-friendly option for users seeking comprehensive security management.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is notably lower than Splunk SOAR, offering a more budget-friendly option for users seeking comprehensive security management.
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
D3 Security offers cost-effective solutions with strong case management and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides extensive integration and analytics capabilities, justifying its higher price for tech buyers looking for advanced customization and a wide range of third-party integrations.
Download D3 Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Rapid7 InsightConnect
3.8 out of 5
InsightConnect excels in simplicity and automation, appealing to those who prioritize ease of use and integration flexibility. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers enhanced incident response through advanced analytics, making it ideal for those investing in comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Rapid7 InsightConnect vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
OTRS Storm
1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
OTRS Storm
1 out of 5

STORM SOAR software means better incident management.
STORM powered by OTRS is cybersecurity incident management software that quickly manages orchestration, automation and response of security incidents.
Plus, there’s a bonus — structured communication. Securely coordinate between IT, security, SOC, risk and management teams too.

View comparison

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Log Management
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)