Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cyware and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Cyware is ranked #22, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 50% of Cyware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Splunk SOAR and Cyware Cyber Fusion compete in the cybersecurity automation and orchestration space. Cyware Cyber Fusion seems to have the upper hand due to its rich feature set and overall functionalities.

Features: Splunk SOAR offers integration capabilities, a sophisticated automation engine, and streamlined workflow processes. Cyware Cyber Fusion provides comprehensive threat intelligence capabilities, enhanced situational awareness, and a broad intelligence framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk SOAR includes detailed guidance for its deployment model and proactive support but can have a steeper learning curve. Cyware Cyber Fusion has a straightforward deployment process and accessible customer assistance, making it more accessible for faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk SOAR has a higher initial setup cost but delivers long-term ROI with its extensive automation capabilities. Cyware Cyber Fusion balances a lower initial cost with competitive ROI through effective threat management and intelligence integration. While Splunk SOAR might have higher entry costs, Cyware's feature set ensures strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Featured Reviews

AdityaDesai

Solutions Architect at ProArch

Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency

Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.

Read full review

AhmedKonsowa

Senior Pre-Sales Engineer (Commercial Sector) at Cyber Knight

A stable solution with excellent features and a helpful technical support team

We use the solution for cyber fusion centers The product has a lot of strong points compared to other tools. The prices must be reduced. I have been using the solution for one year. I am using the latest version of the solution. I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. In my company,…

Read full review

Vikash Kushwaha

Full-Stack Software Engineer at mindpathtech

Automated playbooks have transformed incident response and now protect critical services

The biggest advantage I see from my personal experience as an integrator with Splunk SOAR is that it integrates with most of the security features among the Defenders, Microsoft Defender, firewalls, CloudWatch, and AWS security agents, as well as EC2 machines, firewalls, EDR, IAM, email security, and antivirus. It automates the security process over phishing emails and any other brute force attacks. It helps quite a lot because if 100 phishing emails were sent to a domain, a developer can only reach one, two, or five, but for hundreds of others, it actually supports better automated playbooks and provides major security. Splunk SOAR introduced some new and innovative capabilities or approaches that transformed the way my SOC operates. Splunk SOAR provides playbooks for automatic security features, such as for firewalls, phishing mails, and utilizing Defenders or virtual tools. A playbook maintains its algorithms or processes, so if any kind of security issue arises, the playbook automatically runs and handles actions such as IP blocking or resolving brute force attacks, notifying the admin about suspicious users. After implementing Splunk SOAR, the training process for my SOC team to use playbooks takes a long time during the whole integration part, as it retrieves all credentials from us, whether for an EC2 machine or any antivirus. It takes about one to two months for the team to fully sustain and know the processes of the playbooks and security, particularly for three or four individuals in the cyber security or DevOps team. Splunk SOAR significantly reduces the time spent on monotonous security tasks. In banking, insurance, or healthcare, automated services for addressing phishing emails and security threats are common. Having a manual workforce of two or three individuals can only handle five or ten security threats while Splunk SOAR automates the entire process across apps and machines, making it easier and notifying the admin about the threats. If someone tries to breach, Splunk SOAR immediately processes incoming requests, validating them and blocking any unsecured requests, which reduces a lot of time and effort. With the help of the playbook viewer, I assess the visibility provided by Splunk SOAR as very positive, especially for security purposes. If someone is attacked by 100 users, it blocks all the users, while individual developers such as myself can only handle two or three at a time. The automated process of Splunk SOAR handles all the processes concurrently, making it a game-changing solution. It helps reduce mean time to resolve (MTTR). It takes around 10 to 20 minutes to resolve one incident through the whole process and notify the admin of the issue. If there are multiple incidents, calculating the time taken for each, it generally requires around 40 to 50 minutes to resolve five incidents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Torq has impacted my organization positively by allowing us to earn time and invest resources in other projects that are more meaningful and more interesting, pushing deeper into what a SOC is, and building our processes."

"Torq has changed the day-to-day experience for my security analysts and me by saving literally thousands of man-hours per month since we have implemented some of these use cases."

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"Torq's unified platform approach to AI, SOAR, automation, and case management is superior compared to my experience managing multiple point solutions."

"Any request that comes in, regardless of how complex it is, I can accomplish it with Torq."

"Torq has helped a lot regarding SOC analyst efficiency."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"We have seen fewer failures of automations from the time Torq came into the picture, we've had a more streamlined process of handling incidents, and at the same time, we've learned to embed the AI into our incident types, and that is how it has helped us in the automation."

More Torq pros

"The technical support team is helpful."

"The product is stable."

"The customizable playbook is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"Splunk SOAR is more user-friendly than those tools and provides more precise and advanced information that we require to analyze whether a case is a true positive or false positive."

"The main benefit of using Splunk SOAR is the automation, as a job that would have been very tedious for an analyst to do in terms of removing all the dashboards that haven't been used is now saving space and saving money."

"Splunk SOAR helps in automating a lot of tasks, reduces man-hours, reduces response time since everything is automated, and it requires less human interaction."

"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."

"One particular example I can recall is that in enterprise, we get around 100 to 200 notables daily, which consumes approximately 16 to 40 hours per day for an analyst, but since we have Splunk SOAR, it is now just about five to seven minutes or five to 10 minutes per alert."

"The solution allows us to customize playbooks and incorporate custom code, allowing us to drag and drop elements while still writing code to build the integrations we need."

"Splunk SOAR helps my team prioritize and respond to security alerts and incidents very effectively because it automates many of the manual tasks for us."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"Torq can be improved by adding some more features, such as adding more automation and providing a no-code option so I don't have to code for everything."

"Torq does extensive marketing saying that SOAR is dead and markets itself as an all-in-one solution, but this is not actually true."

"If Torq could enhance its AI features, it would benefit customers significantly by making the platform even more user-friendly."

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"However, we did encounter some problems with custom steps, which definitely affected our progress, and the speed of bug fixes is also a bit slower than expected."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"Torq can probably use more ML and look at what can be closed and what cannot be closed in terms of data classification."

More Torq cons

"The prices must be reduced."

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."

"The price of Splunk SOAR is high. From a price perspective, the cost for an organization is very high."

"Splunk SOAR has room to improve its offering for small-sized customers. The price is not fair for smaller-sized customers."

"The gap for improvement I see is response time because it takes a lot of time to have a response from them."

"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."

"There are areas in Splunk SOAR that have room for improvement. To make Splunk SOAR a better solution, there could be better built-in debugging tools, smarter playbook suggestions, and enhanced lifecycle management."

"Creating playbooks using the solution’s playbook editor, for me, is very cumbersome. There have been instances where I have said to myself that I just don't want to use this editor. I might just use a code block and write my own code within it... The functionality in the playbook editor is 80 percent there, but that 20 percent is still lacking. They could make it more efficient."

"We face some challenges with accuracy, particularly with false negatives and positives; we need to perform manual verification on internal threats but find it acceptable for external IOCs."

"Technical support can be improvised more. That is one area where I feel the team is sometimes struggling."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

21%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

What has not worked as well as I hoped with Torq is related to product data management and storing data, although it ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

My main use case for Torq is for managing IT services and providing faster response.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would rate Torq a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. I chose this rating because customer service is excellent. I suggest to...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I am from the technical part of the organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The steep learning curve for custom playbooks requires solid Python and API familiarity, and there are some issues se...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Splunk Phantom?

The main use case that I have been using, and many customers are asking for, is automation, specifically automated al...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 22% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 9% of the time

Dropzone AI vs Torq

Compared 8% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

More Torq Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 11% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 10% of the time

Logsign SOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 6% of the time

Cymulate vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 3% of the time

More Cyware Cyber Fusion Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 10% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 6% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

October 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

November 2026

Download Cyware Cyber Fusion product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

October 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

No data available

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)

Phantom

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Cyware Cyber Fusion provides advanced cybersecurity capabilities, serving as a comprehensive solution for enterprises seeking enhanced threat intelligence and incident management.

This tool integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures, offering capabilities in orchestrating threat intelligence, automated response, and incident collaboration. Its real-time threat tracking and robust incident management features enhance cybersecurity strategies for businesses.

What are the key features of Cyware Cyber Fusion?

Threat Intelligence Platform: Aggregates and analyzes threat data for proactive defense strategies.
Security Orchestration and Automation: Streamlines response workflows for quicker incident resolution.
Incident Response Management: Coordinates real-time response across teams for efficient threat mitigation.
Collaboration Hub: Facilitates secure communication and collaboration among various security teams.
Granular Reporting Tools: Offers detailed analytics for performance assessment and improvement plans.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Increased Operational Efficiency: Automates processes, reducing manual workload and human error.
Improved Threat Detection: Enhances the speed and accuracy of identifying potential threats.
Streamlined Incident Management: Simplifies incident handling to minimize downtime and disruption.
Enhanced Communication: Strengthens coordination between security teams, improving overall response.
Scalability: Provides the flexibility to grow with organizational requirements, ensuring long-term viability.

Cyware Cyber Fusion is implemented across diverse industries including finance, healthcare, and retail, adapting to each sector's specific cybersecurity requirements. It enables organizations to develop industry-specific threat models, ensuring tailored protection while maintaining compliance with regulatory standards. The iterative design ensures ongoing adaptability to emerging threats.

Cyware

Splunk SOAR focuses on automating security operations with seamless third-party integrations and customizable workflows, enhancing incident response and threat management.

Splunk SOAR offers robust playbook automation and powerful API connectivity, allowing organizations to streamline workflows and integrate extensively with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow. With its capabilities in real-time data visualization and automated threat responses, it significantly enhances security and reduces manual efforts. Users appreciate the ease of creating playbooks, which reduces mean time to detect and resolve. However, attention to its integration challenges with Microsoft products, the need for more playbooks, and improved customization tools is necessary. Enhancements in the development process, visibility, scalability, and case management options are also beneficial. Improving documentation and training resources would add more depth and accessibility.

What are the top features of Splunk SOAR?

Third-party integrations: Supports extensive integration with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow.
Playbook automation: Facilitates easy creation and management of automated workflows.
Customizable workflows: Offers Python-based customization for tailored security operations.
API connectivity: Powerful API support for seamless tool consolidation and streamlined workflows.
Data visualization: Provides real-time data visualization for enhanced situational awareness.

What benefits or ROI users should consider?

Operational efficiency: Reduces mean time to detect and resolve incidents through automation.
Manual effort reduction: Automates threat responses, minimizing manual workload in security operations.
Enhanced security: Offers end-to-end visibility and automated threat mitigation processes.
Time savings: Optimizes processes and improves response efficiency in cybersecurity operations.

Organizations implement Splunk SOAR in industries to automate tasks in Security Operation Centers, addressing incidents such as phishing, brute force, and ransomware. It integrates with third-party applications for threat intelligence enrichment, commonly deployed both on-premise and cloud, enhancing cybersecurity efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

September 2026

Free Report: Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.