No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

What is Sendbird?

Featured Sendbird reviews

Sendbird mindshare

Product category:
As of June 2026, the mindshare of Sendbird in the Enterprise Social Software category stands at 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sendbird1.8%
Slack Business - Enterprise9.6%
Microsoft Teams6.9%
Other81.7%
Enterprise Social Software
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jun 16, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business57
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise24
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Media Company
7%
Non Tech Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
University
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Government
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
2%
Non Profit
2%
Retailer
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Sendbird with alternative products

Learn more about Sendbird

Related questions

 
Sendbird Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I find Sendbird excellent for customer support, valuing its real-time messaging, conversation management, and routing for improved efficiency. It's stable and scalable, but I'd like more built-in analytics and chat interface customization to further optimize support.
Vice President, Technology (Mobile Architecture & Platform Lead) at Playfora3.5Sendbird is reliable for chat and live streaming, boosting user engagement. While stable and scalable, it's expensive, and I've experienced frustrating beta issues, poor documentation clarity, and customer support lacking depth for complex problems.
Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees5.0I deploy Sendbird for customer website chatbots via WordPress, saving significant development time with its no-code setup. It's reliable, scalable, offers strong ROI, and effectively answers ~70% of queries using knowledge bases. I rate it a perfect ten.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees5.0I use Sendbird for mobile chat development, valuing its user status features and fast custom chat creation. Its AI is accurate. I recommend it for quick chat implementation, though I'd like more multi-platform SDKs and updated documentation.
Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited4.0We use Sendbird to implement a chat feature in our salon app with Flutter. It offers valuable features like metadata, online/offline messaging, and reactions, but needs better Flutter documentation and occasional stability improvements for accurate message ordering.
Senior Software Engineer at freelancer4.0I have used Sendbird for real-time chatting in applications with video calling and social media functionalities. It offers valuable features like receipt IDs and typing indicators, though integrating more analytics tools and emoji functionalities could enhance it further.
Software Engineer at Howl3.5We use Sendbird's JavaScript SDK for our React Native app to manage chat functions efficiently. Its flexibility and optimization are beneficial, though occasionally the documentation does not align with SDK behavior, necessitating workarounds. Overall, it simplifies chat management.
Software engineer at freelancer4.0We used Sendbird to facilitate communication in our travel-based company, appreciating its API-based backend management and scalability. However, we faced issues with connection delays and adaptation challenges during updates, although improvements are in progress.