No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo

Top 10 Radware Cloud WAF Service Alternatives

Vendor: Radware
4.5 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Radware Cloud WAF Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Imperva Application Security Platform, and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Radware Cloud WAF Service surpasses its competitors by offering superior real-time threat intelligence, adaptive attack prevention, and comprehensive compliance support, ensuring robust protection and enhancing security performance for businesses globally.

Radware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Radware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud emphasizes comprehensive security across multi-cloud environments, excelling in CSPM and infrastructure-as-code integration. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service focuses on DDoS protection and API security, offering competitive pricing and advanced threat detection features suitable for enterprises needing real-time analytics.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a straightforward setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service may present a more complex and potentially higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involves a straightforward setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service may present a more complex and potentially higher initial expense.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform
4.3 out of 5
Imperva offers robust DDoS, malware, and API security with seamless integration and extensive features. In comparison, Radware emphasizes ease of deployment and automated analytics. Tech buyers might prefer Imperva for its comprehensive coverage or Radware for its cost-effective, scalable solutions.
Download Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Imperva Application Security Platform offers a straightforward setup, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a more complex initial setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Application Security Platform offers a straightforward setup, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a more complex initial setup process.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers comprehensive features like load balancing and DDoS protection, ideal for scalability and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides robust bot management and premium support, suited for robust threat detection and real-time attack prevention.
Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers competitive setup cost efficiency, while Radware Cloud WAF Service provides a more premium pricing structure aimed at enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers competitive setup cost efficiency, while Radware Cloud WAF Service provides a more premium pricing structure aimed at enterprise solutions.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler offers comprehensive application delivery with load balancing and cloud-ready features, ideal for enterprises needing extensive integration. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service prioritizes bot management and AI-driven security, appealing to organizations focused on advanced threat detection and cloud deployment.
Download NetScaler vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
NetScaler has higher setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, making Radware more economical for initial deployment, while NetScaler offers enhanced features that may justify its pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has higher setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, making Radware more economical for initial deployment, while NetScaler offers enhanced features that may justify its pricing.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiWeb is an economical choice, providing comprehensive features like AI, threat prevention, and ease of integration, appealing to SMEs. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service's advanced DDoS mitigation and bot management attract large enterprises despite higher pricing.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Fortinet FortiWeb has a higher setup cost compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, making Radware an attractive option for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiWeb has a higher setup cost compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, making Radware an attractive option for budget-conscious users.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)
4.3 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels with ease of use and AI-driven capabilities, appealing to larger enterprises seeking cost-effective DDoS protection. In comparison, Check Point WAF focuses on extensive threat prevention, favoring businesses needing customizable security despite its complex setup.
Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher initial setup cost compared to Check Point WAF, which offers more cost-efficient options for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher initial setup cost compared to Check Point WAF, which offers more cost-efficient options for setup.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced features like DDoS mitigation and seamless integration, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector's AI-powered threat intelligence suits buyers needing robust security, despite requiring a layered approach for full protection.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a lower initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Akamai App and API Protector generally involves higher initial expenses but may offer additional advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a lower initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Akamai App and API Protector generally involves higher initial expenses but may offer additional advanced features.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
HAProxy
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
HAProxy
4.2 out of 5
HAProxy excels in load balancing with TCP support, ideal for scalability and stability. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service integrates advanced security, including bot management, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive protection. HAProxy's open-source nature contrasts with Radware's professional support and structured integration.
Download HAProxy vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
HAProxy offers a lower upfront setup cost compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which has a more substantial initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights HAProxy's affordability against Radware's premium service setup charges.
View comparison
Pricing
HAProxy offers a lower upfront setup cost compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which has a more substantial initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights HAProxy's affordability against Radware's premium service setup charges.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Azure Front Door is ideal for its affordability and integration simplicity with CDN and intelligent routing features. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers excellent bot and security management, making it suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive protection, despite its higher cost.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Azure Front Door features a straightforward setup process with cost-saving advantages, while Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a more complex configuration with a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Front Door features a straightforward setup process with cost-saving advantages, while Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a more complex configuration with a higher initial investment.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Aikido Security
4.5 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Aikido Security
4.5 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF offers robust application security with intuitive analytics and user-friendly features suitable for large organizations. In comparison, Aikido Security simplifies developer tasks with integrated security features, making it ideal for DevSecOps with a focus on ease of use and affordability.
Download Aikido Security vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a notable setup cost, whereas Aikido Security offers a lower entry setup price. This pricing distinction could significantly impact the initial investment required for businesses considering these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a notable setup cost, whereas Aikido Security offers a lower entry setup price. This pricing distinction could significantly impact the initial investment required for businesses considering these solutions.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
AWS WAF is favored for its affordability, scalability, and seamless Amazon integration. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced threat protection with features like bot management and DDoS mitigation, appealing to those needing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download AWS WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
AWS WAF has minimal initial setup costs, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup fees. Radware's comprehensive service justifies its cost with advanced features, contrasting AWS WAF's cost-effectiveness for basic needs.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS WAF has minimal initial setup costs, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup fees. Radware's comprehensive service justifies its cost with advanced features, contrasting AWS WAF's cost-effectiveness for basic needs.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
F5 Advanced WAF offers comprehensive features ideal for large enterprises, but needs better reporting and user interface enhancements. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service is competitively priced and scalable, suitable for smaller businesses needing automated attack prevention and cloud deployment flexibility.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
The F5 Advanced WAF has a noted setup cost, whereas the Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a differing setup cost, highlighting a key financial disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The F5 Advanced WAF has a noted setup cost, whereas the Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a differing setup cost, highlighting a key financial disparity between the two solutions.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.7 out of 5
Azure Application Gateway offers affordability and seamless integration with other Azure services, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service focuses on advanced security features like robust DDoS and bot prevention, catering to enterprise-level security requirements.
Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway involves a higher initial setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a more cost-effective alternative for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway involves a higher initial setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service presents a more cost-effective alternative for initial deployment.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
F5 Distributed Cloud Services
4.3 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service appeals to buyers seeking seamless deployment and intelligent threat processing with competitive pricing. In comparison, F5 Distributed Cloud Services attracts those prioritizing multi-cloud management and robust support, despite higher initial costs, emphasizing broad service potential and integrated security features.
Download F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers a more complex and potentially higher setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers a more complex and potentially higher setup fee.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Uplynk
4.0 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Uplynk
4.0 out of 5
Uplynk appeals with competitive pricing and media management, focusing on seamless content delivery. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service focuses on advanced cybersecurity, offering superior online protection. Tech buyers may choose Uplynk for efficient media solutions or Radware for enhanced security features eliminating concerns of downtime.
Download Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk Report
Uplynk has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service might involve higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Uplynk has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service might involve higher upfront expenses.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.1 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.1 out of 5
NGINX App Protect excels in adaptable environments with flexible policies, making it ideal for on-premises deployment with a cost-effective pricing structure. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides AI-driven analytics and superior cloud integration for organizations needing extensive threat detection and prevention.
Download NGINX App Protect vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
NGINX App Protect offers a more favorable setup cost than Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a cost-effective solution for initial deployment, while Radware might imply higher initial expenses reflecting potential advanced features included in the initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NGINX App Protect offers a more favorable setup cost than Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a cost-effective solution for initial deployment, while Radware might imply higher initial expenses reflecting potential advanced features included in the initial setup.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Link11
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Link11
4.2 out of 5
Link11 excels in DDoS protection and deployment options, appealing to businesses needing robust security. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced threat detection and competitive pricing, making it ideal for organizations seeking sophisticated application-layer threat protection. Both offer strong customer support.
Download Link11 vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Link11 requires no setup cost, making it more budget-friendly compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which includes an initial setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Link11 requires no setup cost, making it more budget-friendly compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which includes an initial setup fee.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
SiteLock
3.3 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
SiteLock
3.3 out of 5
SiteLock offers competitive pricing and easy deployment, ideal for businesses focusing on cost-efficiency and basic protection. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides advanced features and robust security, appealing to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive defense despite higher costs and more complex setup.
Download Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. SiteLock Report
SiteLock has lower setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a cost-effective choice for initial deployment, while Radware's pricing signifies a potentially higher investment for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
SiteLock has lower setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, highlighting a cost-effective choice for initial deployment, while Radware's pricing signifies a potentially higher investment for advanced features.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud
4.5 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service offers innovative real-time threat mitigation, ideal for immediate deployment needs. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud excels in integration and visibility, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive security customization and long-term ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud, which offers more affordable initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud, which offers more affordable initial deployment.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall integrates seamlessly with Microsoft services and offers flexible scalability and pricing. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in advanced features like real-time threat detection and comprehensive protection, appealing to those needing robust security for complex applications and AI-driven analytics.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Azure Web Application Firewall has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Radware Cloud WAF Service features varied pricing based on specific configurations, highlighting significant differences in initial investment expectations for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Web Application Firewall has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Radware Cloud WAF Service features varied pricing based on specific configurations, highlighting significant differences in initial investment expectations for users.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Sucuri
4.2 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Sucuri
4.2 out of 5
Sucuri stands out for its competitive pricing and efficient customer service, making it ideal for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service's higher cost is justified by its robust feature set, targeting larger organizations needing advanced security capabilities.
Download Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a more affordable setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is priced higher, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a more affordable setup cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is priced higher, reflecting its advanced features.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Wallarm NG WAF
4.3 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Wallarm NG WAF
4.3 out of 5
Wallarm NG WAF is preferred for its easy integration and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in advanced threat prevention and customer service, making it suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive security measures and willing to invest in extensive protection capabilities.
Download Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report
Wallarm NG WAF has a lower setup cost compared to the Radware Cloud WAF Service. Radware Cloud WAF is priced higher but offers distinct features, providing a different level of service compared to Wallarm NG WAF.
View comparison
Pricing
Wallarm NG WAF has a lower setup cost compared to the Radware Cloud WAF Service. Radware Cloud WAF is priced higher but offers distinct features, providing a different level of service compared to Wallarm NG WAF.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)
3.8 out of 5
Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels in cost-effectiveness and simple integration. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF provides advanced security features for comprehensive threat coverage. Fastly's streamlined deployment contrasts with Radware's complex setup, while Radware offers extensive customer support for implementation assistance.
Download Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two options.
View comparison
Pricing
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two options.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service
4.4 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in advanced bot management and seamless deployment, appealing to enterprises focusing on security and ease of integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service attracts buyers with its robust AI-driven analytics and threat intelligence, offering strong protection for multitenant web applications.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service has no upfront setup costs, whereas Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service requires a modest setup fee, making Radware more cost-effective at the initial stage.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service has no upfront setup costs, whereas Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF-as-a-Service requires a modest setup fee, making Radware more cost-effective at the initial stage.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
open-appsec
1 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
open-appsec
1 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in support and integration, appealing to those needing real-time assistance. In comparison, open-appsec prioritizes feature richness and flexibility, suitable for businesses seeking affordability and adaptability with less direct support.
Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a higher setup cost, while open-appsec offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a higher setup cost, while open-appsec offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategies.
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Threatx
1 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Threatx
1 out of 5
Threatx offers affordable pricing and effective support, making it appealing for its seamless integration and quick setup. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides comprehensive features like advanced DDoS protection, justifying its higher price with broader threat coverage and detailed configuration options.
Threatx incurs higher setup costs with a focus on comprehensive security features, while Radware Cloud WAF Service offers a more budget-friendly initial setup with essential protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Threatx incurs higher setup costs with a focus on comprehensive security features, while Radware Cloud WAF Service offers a more budget-friendly initial setup with essential protection.

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)
API Security
AI Security