Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Radware and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Wallarm is ranked #38. Radware holds a 1.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Read 32 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews

2,701 Views
481 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

353 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and Radware Cloud WAF Service are products in the web application firewall sector. Wallarm NG WAF stands out in terms of support and pricing, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is favored for its advanced features, especially for users who prioritize comprehensive security measures.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF offers automated protection, scalability, and real-time vulnerability detection. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides advanced threat detection, high availability, and behavioral analysis. Wallarm's automation appeals to users seeking efficiency, whereas Radware offers robust security features preferred in complex threat landscapes.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could enhance its advanced threat capabilities, behavioral analysis, and high traffic management. Radware Cloud WAF Service might improve on ease of deployment, customer service readiness, and cost structure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF offers straightforward deployment and strong customer service, facilitating quicker integration. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides flexible deployment options, though more complex initial setups might be necessary.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is cost-effective with promising ROI due to efficient threat management and competitive pricing. Radware Cloud WAF Service has higher initial costs but delivers valuable long-term functionality, appealing to businesses looking for comprehensive feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Tanuj-Garg

CIO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

API discovery, bot defense, and DDoS capability optimize application security and development

I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment. Closely monitoring alerts during this period is essential to avoid false positives. There's an alert noise issue; during the early stages, we received a high volume of alerts for minor issues, requiring collaboration with the SOC team to fine-tune thresholds and concentrate on genuine threats. The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features I find most valuable about Radware Cloud WAF Service are primarily rate-limiting, geo-blocking, web DDoS protection, and some other basic features."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service has several valuable features, with good support and a user-friendly GUI."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service has improved our efficiency by about 95%."

"Importantly, we have not experienced any zero-day attacks because Radware Cloud offers protection against emerging threats."

"With the Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have not faced any incidents in six years."

"One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks and the requests that these remote networks can generate that are blocked from our servers. That frees us from having to deal with that traffic."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service ensures our systems are stable, running smoothly, and blocking all attacks effectively."

"My experience with the technical support of Radware Cloud WAF Service is that they are excellent, and I have established a strong relationship with the executive leadership up to Roy, the CEO."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"The Cloud Portal has room for improvement."

"Sometimes, I encounter issues with password reset."

"Alert messages for DDoS attacks or other things take time to reach us, causing delays in our response."

"There is a lot more that is expected from Radware's automated analytics for looking at events. There needs to be more context of where protection is required these days."

"Radware's bot manager can be improved because it's very complicated to implement for apps. Radware could also add alerts by WhatsApp or Telegram. It only sends notifications via email or SMS."

"We receive many reports from our security team of IPs flagged by our security tools, such as Palo Alto. I cannot add the file containing the IPs to get them blocked; instead, I have to contact Radware support and open a ticket for them to do it. I need to be able to block flagged IPs myself, as it currently takes more time to open a ticket, contact the support team, and wait four to six hours for a response. I want to be able to upload a file with 2,000-3,000 IPs in the console and then apply and save the configuration."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."

"There should be more customization options for the dashboard, as it is currently fixed and cannot be modified."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."

"The pricing is fair."

"I believe the prices are fair."

"The pricing is fair. We compared Radware to others using industry reviews and Radware is at the top right now."

"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."

"When compared to Akamai and F5, Radware's pricing and licensing are highly competitive."

"I am not directly involved in pricing and setup cost discussions, but it seems that Radware offers a more cost-effective solution compared to F5. It is considered a good value for our budget."

"We are paying $20,000 annually for six licenses that provide basic WAF functionality."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

We are choosing Radware Cloud WAF Service over traditional WAF because it has API first behavioral protection, advanced bot defense, and layer 7 web DDoS capability. It was chosen because of the hy...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 29% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 18% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 25% of the time

Fastly vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 17% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2025

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.

Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.

Radware

Wallarm NG WAF is utilized to protect against web application threats, enhance security policies, and ensure consistent application security. It provides real-time attack prevention, detailed threat analytics, and automated incident response, making it suitable for both small and large-scale environments.

Wallarm NG WAF offers comprehensive API protection and adaptive security measures integrated with DevOps workflows. It efficiently detects and blocks attacks using AI-driven detection algorithms and provides thorough coverage against OWASP Top 10 threats. Users benefit from its easy deployment, scalability, and user-friendly configuration. Detailed analytics and robust performance in diverse environments make it a reliable option. However, users suggest improvements in documentation, customer support, update frequency, initial configuration process, and better integration capabilities to enhance the overall experience.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

Real-time attack prevention: Offers immediate protection against web application threats.
AI-driven detection algorithms: Efficiently identifies and blocks malicious activities.
DevOps integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools and workflows.
OWASP Top 10 coverage: Provides comprehensive protection against top security risks.
Detailed analytics: Delivers in-depth threat analysis for better security management.
Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale environments.
Easy deployment: Quick and simple setup process for immediate use.

What benefits should you look for in Wallarm NG WAF reviews?

Enhanced security policies: Strengthens overall application security.
Consistent application security: Ensures uniform protection across all applications.
Automated incident response: Reduces manual intervention during security events.
Comprehensive API protection: Safeguards all API interactions effectively.
Adaptive security measures: Adjusts defenses based on emerging threats.
User-friendly configuration: Simplifies initial setup and ongoing management.
Robust performance: Maintains high security standards in various environments.

Wallarm NG WAF is implemented across different industries, including finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. It addresses their unique security needs by providing adaptive protections, detailed threat analytics, and integration capabilities. The scalability and ease of deployment make it an ideal choice for organizations managing large-scale applications and APIs.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Free Report: Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.