Azure Front Door vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

Microsoft and Radware are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.9, while Radware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. Microsoft holds a 4.5% mindshare in WAF, compared to Radware’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Radware users who would recommend it.

Azure Front Door

Read 15 Azure Front Door reviews

3,307 Views
1,669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Read 31 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews

2,701 Views
481 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Front Door

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Azure Front Door and Radware Cloud WAF Service both compete in the web traffic management category. Radware has an edge in threat detection and advanced protection features.

Features: Azure Front Door offers network-level traffic inspection, SSL offloading, and includes customizable WAF policies integrated with CDN and load-balancing, suitable for organizations entrenched in Azure's ecosystem. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides in-depth threat detection, advanced bot management, CDN performance enhancements, and valuable machine-learning capabilities to identify unknown threats.

Room for Improvement: Azure Front Door could improve by broadening its cloud vendor compatibility and reducing latency. There's also room for better product clarity. Radware Cloud WAF Service could enhance ease of integration, refine its API discovery feature, and improve support response times while addressing false positives more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Front Door is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft services and adequate customer support, though variability exists based on personnel. Radware Cloud WAF offers a smooth deployment process potent in hybrid cloud adaptability, though some users face a steeper learning curve initially. Both have robust customer service and public cloud functionality.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Front Door has competitive tiered pricing but can become costly in premium tiers. Its ROI is positive, due to efficiencies and security. Radware Cloud WAF is pricier, especially with advanced features, but offers comprehensive security packages that deliver a notable ROI through superior threat prevention.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

Azure Front Door offers cost savings and efficient management, yielding a clear return on investment despite initial transition uncertainties.

Sentiment score

8.0

Radware Cloud WAF Service enhances security, reduces costs, and boosts ROI by improving efficiency and minimizing management needs.

Azure Front Door offers a quick return on investment once it is set up.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

I wouldn't be able to give a number, but Radware Cloud WAF does save time for our staff due to the automation and excellent detection, which is invaluable.

Haris Ishaq

IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Radware Cloud WAF has helped reduce false positives and efforts, which in turn, improved the total cost of ownership by freeing up time to focus on other projects.

reviewer2102988

EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

The ROI for Radware Cloud WAF Service is prominent as it is twenty percent more cost-effective compared to Imperva.

reviewer1854075

System Admin at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.2

Azure Front Door receives high marks for customer service, with users praising knowledgeable support staff and clear documentation.

Sentiment score

7.8

Radware Cloud WAF Service is praised for efficient, knowledgeable support, especially in handling high-priority issues with technical expertise.

I am able to set up a critical call with Microsoft, and they respond quickly to tickets with the highest severity.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

The support provided by Radware's Emergency Response Team is excellent.

OMPRAKASH

Assistant Manager (Network and Cyber Security) at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have ERT premium support with a five-minute SLA.

reviewer2102988

EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

They are usually very fast in response.

reviewer2667027

engineer with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.6

Azure Front Door offers scalable, reliable solutions for enterprises, enhancing performance and managing applications efficiently despite higher costs.

Sentiment score

8.3

Radware Cloud WAF Service is highly scalable, seamlessly handling global traffic and integrating with security tools for diverse applications.

I find that Front Door can become expensive for large-scale projects with more transactions and users.

Mohamed Amin Nasri

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

I consider the scalability of Azure Front Door to be strong.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Since it's a Cloud WAF, it is always scalable.

reviewer2102988

EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

I would rate it nine out of ten in terms of handling the capacity and volume.

reviewer1854075

System Admin at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Anytime we've had any issues, Radware has provided us a solution, indicating its high scalability.

Haris Ishaq

IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.5

Azure Front Door is praised for high stability and reliability, though some DNS management issues are occasionally noted.

Sentiment score

8.2

Radware Cloud WAF Service is noted for high stability, reliable performance, with brief downtimes quickly resolved and highly rated.

I rate Azure Front Door's stability a nine because it is easy to make updates through Azure Portal.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

I have never encountered downtime, maintenance-related issues, or latency.

OMPRAKASH

Assistant Manager (Network and Cyber Security) at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent, and I would rate it as a ten.

Cristian Tello

Security Team Leader at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

There have been no issues with downtime, bugs, or glitches.

reviewer1854075

System Admin at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Room For Improvement

Azure Front Door requires enhancements in multi-cloud support, load balancing, IP support, latency, UI, pricing, rules, monitoring, and APIs.

Radware Cloud WAF needs better integration, API protection, UI, documentation, and training, alongside enhanced support and cost-effective licensing.

If I could use Azure Front Door with private IP addresses, it would be more beneficial.

Mohamed Amin Nasri

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

The only significant adjustment required is with URL set parameters that need to be passed for an existing domain.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

It would be beneficial if we could perform POST requests and integrate our applications more effectively.

reviewer1854075

System Admin at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.

Tanuj-Garg

CIO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Improving dashboard capabilities to provide this information clearly for management is crucial.

OMPRAKASH

Assistant Manager (Network and Cyber Security) at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Setup Cost

Azure Front Door's pay-as-you-go pricing offers flexibility, with costs and value balancing for various project needs.

Enterprise users consider Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing high, with complexity and extra costs impacting smaller enterprises.

Azure Front Door is cheaper for small projects, companies, or applications compared to using separate tools.

Mohamed Amin Nasri

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Pricing could be more competitive, especially for smaller customers.

reviewer2102988

EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

I find Radware Cloud WAF to be a quite expensive product compared to others.

reviewer2667027

engineer with 51-200 employees

The pricing is not cheap; it is expensive, but it is effective.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Valuable Features

Azure Front Door provides scalable, secure, and affordable solutions with advanced features like SSL offloading, load balancing, and DDoS protection.

Radware Cloud WAF Service provides user-friendly, scalable Layer 7 protection with automated analytics, threat blocking, and comprehensive DDoS security.

Azure Front Door provides DDoS protection and features related to WAF.

Mohamed Amin Nasri

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

Azure Front Door includes a built-in web application firewall, which performs signature-based checks of the request payload, offering protection against common attacks or malicious requests.

Bernard Parinas

Co-Founder at arpa

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS.

reviewer2102988

EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Radware Cloud has significantly reduced attacks on our applications.

OMPRAKASH

Assistant Manager (Network and Cyber Security) at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Radware Cloud WAF Service ensures our systems are stable, running smoothly, and blocking all attacks effectively.

reviewer1854075

System Admin at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report

Categories and Ranking

Azure Front Door

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (18th)

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Front Door is 4.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

SayedAbdelrhman

Cloud Solution Architect at MentorMate

Provide bot protection and has proficient documentation

During our discussion with the internal Microsoft team about assessing our environment, they confirmed that we have sufficient security measures, especially regarding edge protection. Internally, we believe we are now certified. In the future, we could consider adding layer four protection from the firewall. Front Door combines CDN and WAF protection, so further enhancing its features could benefit both the customer and us. We monitor the number of users attempting to access our IP or DNS servers. When designing the system, we initially needed to ensure our environment was protected with a WAF. However, WAF is currently too costly for us, so we created private links and connected them to Front Door. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Tanuj-Garg

CIO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

API discovery, bot defense, and DDoS capability optimize application security and development

I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment. Closely monitoring alerts during this period is essential to avoid false positives. There's an alert noise issue; during the early stages, we received a high volume of alerts for minor issues, requiring collaboration with the SOC team to fine-tune thresholds and concentrate on genuine threats. The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Front Door?

Rules Engine is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Front Door?

I am not sure about the pricing but believe Azure Front Door might require a higher cost due to its entry point nature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

We are choosing Radware Cloud WAF Service over traditional WAF because it has API first behavioral protection, advanced bot defense, and layer 7 web DDoS capability. It was chosen because of the hy...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Azure Front Door

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door

Compared 16% of the time

Akamai vs Azure Front Door

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Global Accelerator vs Azure Front Door

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Azure Front Door

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Front Door Competitors

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 28% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 18% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door

June 2025

Download Azure Front Door product report

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

May 2025

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Also Known As

Azure Front-Door

No data available

Overview

Azure Front Door is employed for securing external traffic, global load balancing, integrating web application firewalls, enabling disaster recovery, and enhancing application accessibility.

Organizations leverage Azure Front Door to support data publishing, act as a CDN, and ensure low latency for global users. Clients use it to protect numerous internet-accessible applications, integrate with DNS, and implement custom routes. Favored for caching web content and securely, efficiently distributing traffic to backend services, Azure Front Door offers SSL offloading, traffic inspection, and global scalability. Users value its affordability, ease of implementation, and web application firewall. Azure Front Door provides rich security features, traffic management, and URL rewriting. Load-balancing capabilities enhance performance with additional content security policies and bot protection. Integrations, including with GitOps, along with combined CDN and load-balancing, are also highlighted.

What are the most important features?

SSL Offloading: Reduces the burden on backend services
Traffic Inspection: Enhances security by inspecting incoming traffic
Global Scalability: Ensures performance for users worldwide
Web Application Firewall: Provides in-depth security features
Load Balancing: Distributes traffic to improve performance
URL Rewriting: Customizes URL paths for better navigation
Bot Protection: Shields applications from automated threats
Integrations: Supports technologies like GitOps
Combined CDN and Load-Balancing: Streamlines content delivery and traffic management

What are the benefits or ROI of using this service?

Affordability: Provides cost-effective solutions for web traffic management
Ease of Implementation: Streamlines setup processes for quick deployment
Enhanced Security: Offers robust protection for web applications
Improved Performance: Optimizes traffic distribution and latency
Scalability: Supports growing application demands with global reach

Azure Front Door finds usage across multiple industries due to its versatile applications. E-commerce companies benefit from improved global accessibility and speed, while financial institutions leverage its security features for protecting sensitive data. Media and entertainment sectors use its CDN capabilities for seamless content delivery, and healthcare providers rely on its compliance and protection standards for patient data security.

Microsoft

Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.

Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.

Radware

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.