Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025
Radware Cloud WAF Service and Akamai App and API Protector compete in the cloud security space. Radware appears to have an edge in scalability and ease of integration, while Akamai offers a highly customizable and comprehensive security feature set.
Features: Radware Cloud WAF Service emphasizes scalability, stability, and ease of use with strong Layer 7 protection, bot management, and DDoS defense. It employs machine learning to improve traffic analysis and features a CDN for better content delivery. Akamai App and API Protector is highlighted for its robust bot management and adaptive stream delivery. It provides detailed traffic analysis and offers extensive customization and integration options.
Room for Improvement: Radware Cloud WAF Service needs enhanced integration capabilities, better reporting, and API management features. Users seek more sophisticated analytics and improved documentation. Akamai App and API Protector requires improvements in its WAF features, better integration with enterprise systems, and simplified usage for regular users. Both products need better customer support and analytical capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Cloud WAF Service offers efficient public cloud deployment with strong support, though response times can be improved. Users value the provided guidance during deployment. Akamai App and API Protector gets positive feedback for support within hybrid cloud options, albeit with varied response times. Radware is recognized for swift issue resolutions and effective customer interactions.
Pricing and ROI: Radware Cloud WAF Service is competitively priced, offering good value, particularly with bundled deals. It delivers significant ROI by lowering expenses and risks. Akamai App and API Protector, though considered expensive, justifies its cost with comprehensive features, appealing to large enterprises. The ROI is attributed to enhanced security offerings, with smaller businesses finding pricing challenging.
