No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo

Azure Web Application Firewall Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Azure Web Application Firewall?

Azure Web Application Firewall provides strong protection, easy setup, and smooth integration with Microsoft services. It excels in request filtering, custom rule creation, and protection against OWASP Top 10 attacks, ensuring scalable and reliable performance for businesses.

Get the Azure Web Application Firewall Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and more!
Azure Web Application Firewall is the #11 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls and #20 ranked solution in top Microsoft Security Suite solutions. PeerSpot users give Azure Web Application Firewall an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Azure Web Application Firewall is most commonly compared to Microsoft Intune: Azure Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Intune. Azure Web Application Firewall is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Web Application Firewall
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Web Application Firewall reviews

Read more reviews

Azure Web Application Firewall mindshare

Product category:
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
As of April 2026, the mindshare of Azure Web Application Firewall in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 2.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Web Application Firewall2.5%
Imperva Application Security Platform7.6%
Fortinet FortiWeb6.5%
Other83.4%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Web Application Firewall reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Apr 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Web Application Firewall vs Fortinet FortiWebApr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Web Application Firewall vs F5 Advanced WAFApr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Web Application Firewall vs Imperva Application Security PlatformApr 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Intune4.1N/A94%345 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint4.1N/A95%213 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Azure Web Application Firewall offers valuable features including ease of setup, automation, and minimal management skills required. Users appreciate its robust security controls, integration with Microsoft services, scalability, and protection against OWASP Top 10 threats and DDoS attacks. It allows custom rule creation and seamless integration with Azure, enhancing performance and security. Cost-effectiveness, flexible pricing, and strong technical support are highlighted. Its efficient dashboards and analytics support threat detection and reduction of issues.
  • "The solution has good dashboards."
  • "We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation."
  • "The best features of Azure Web Application Firewall are that it provides security and protection from poorly designed web applications."

Room for Improvement

Azure Web Application Firewall can enhance management interfaces, configuration flexibility, deployment simplicity, and proxy forwarding support. Improving documentation and reporting features is essential, along with better integration of features from competitive products like Barracuda. Performance impact assessment and pricing adjustments for smaller companies are crucial. Additional improvements in logging, troubleshooting, and accessibility for beginners are needed. Regular updates can be challenging, and enhancing certificate handling processes and supportive community resources would be beneficial.
  • "I think deployment should be simplified so that a non-techie can handle it."
  • "The support for proxy forwarding could improve."
  • "I encountered difficulties with certificates for a Linux server when implementing protection."

ROI

Azure Web Application Firewall reduces costs compared to options from Fortinet, Check Point, and Palo Alto. Users report savings in administration expenses and improved customer security adherence. AI-based suggestions enhance time efficiency, contributing to favorable financial returns. Applications deployed on this platform achieve better invoicing opportunities and improved investment returns, despite recent exploit threats affecting competitors.

Pricing

Azure Web Application Firewall's pricing is considered fair and competitive for enterprise buyers. Many organizations appreciate its reasonable costs and ease of management under Microsoft's enterprise agreements. Some users report that while higher SKUs can drive up prices, the overall value and functionality are worth it as it competes well against AWS and GCP. In Brazil, large enterprises find the terms favorable, and many choose Azure WAF for its pricing advantages.
  • "The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month."
  • "I give the pricing a nine out of ten."
  • "Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."

Popular Use Cases

Azure Web Application Firewall primarily serves to safeguard services from external threats and manage branch connectivity. Users employ it for traffic filtering, reverse proxy functions, log analytics, and cloud security. It provides layer 7 protection for e-commerce tools and utilizes Microsoft Defender for SQL injection defense. Organizations define custom rules for data routing, block suspicious requests, and create custom access policies, particularly for cloud-dependent applications in a Microsoft environment.

Service and Support

Azure Web Application Firewall support receives mixed responses. Many praise its responsiveness and knowledgeable assistance, particularly appreciating language-specific help. Satisfaction varies with support levels, with higher tiers providing superior service. Some express dissatisfaction without premium plans, citing difficulty getting swift help. Microsoft's response times are generally satisfactory. Experienced users commend dedicated architect assistance, though there are concerns about issue resolution being inefficient at times by support teams. Overall, satisfaction levels with support differ significantly among users.

Deployment

Azure Web Application Firewall's initial setup is straightforward for most users, often completed in under two hours. Those experienced with Azure find it simpler, while beginners may face challenges. Adequate resources and online guides aid in deployment, although some areas like OpenAI integration may be less documented. Typically, an intuitive interface and comprehensive guides support the process, with configuration taking more time depending on individual familiarity with Azure services.

Scalability

Azure Web Application Firewall is widely praised for its scalability. Users consider it capable of handling extensive traffic across regions without relying on a specific availability zone. It can be adjusted to fit various needs, with high marks given for its performance and ease of scaling. While requiring certain SKUs for advanced usage, most users find its scalability satisfactory, with many planning to increase their usage.

Stability

Azure Web Application Firewall is praised for its stability, with users noting its reliable performance and lack of technical challenges. While some reported occasional issues related to phone service or isolated latency, these were infrequent and manageable. Improvements over the years have fixed past stability concerns. Most users find it stable, rating it highly, typically an eight or nine out of ten, expressing satisfaction with its consistent and dependable operation.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Azure Web Application Firewall Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business125
Midsize Enterprise78
Large Enterprise272
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Retailer
4%
University
3%
Media Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%

Compare Azure Web Application Firewall with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Azure Web Application Firewall

Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, affordable, and efficient protection against critical security threats like DDoS and SQL injection, with seamless integration with Azure tools, analytics, and AI capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle web requests through role-based access, automation features, and custom policies, especially valuable in cloud environments and ecommerce. Despite the need to improve reporting, management, proxy forwarding, and documentation, it remains a reliable choice for securing front-facing applications.

What are the most important features of Azure Web Application Firewall?
  • Request Filtering: Blocks undesirable web traffic.
  • Custom Rule Creation: Enables granular control.
  • OWASP Protection: Shields against top 10 security vulnerabilities.
  • Seamless Azure Integration: Enhances security management.
What benefits and ROI should users look for in Azure Web Application Firewall reviews?
  • Scalability: Supports business growth.
  • Affordability: Cost-effective for businesses.
  • Reduced Deployment Time: Quick and efficient setup.
  • Enhanced Security: Protects against various threats.

Azure Web Application Firewall is widely used in ecommerce for securing transactions against cyber threats like phishing and SQL injection. It also supports reverse proxy setups, provides detailed log analytics, and offers layer 7 protection, making it suitable for businesses needing robust security for both front-facing and branch connectivity applications.

Related questions

  • 123
Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
  • 66
Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
  • 178
What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
  • 63
Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
  • 51
Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
  • 111
F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
  • 228
When should companies use SSL Inspection?
  • 251
How does a WAF help to protect against DDoS attacks?
  • 176
NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy
  • 96
What's right for me? Fortinet or Citrix?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Microsoft Security Suite

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Intune vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Entra ID vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Sentinel vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Azure Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall
NetScaler vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
NetScaler vs Azure Web Application Firewall
Azure Front Door vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Front Door vs Azure Web Application Firewall
F5 Advanced WAF vs Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Azure Web Application Firewall
See all alternatives
 
Azure Web Application Firewall Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC4.0I’ve used Azure Web Application Firewall for six years and appreciate its analytics, AI integration, and support. It's stable and scalable, though pricing and usability could improve. Overall, it's effective for cloud environments despite a moderate learning curve.
Owner at ICAL S.A.4.0No summary available
Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.4.5I use Azure Web Application Firewall primarily for front-facing applications due to its ease of configuration within Microsoft's suite. While the frequent updates can be a maintenance burden, the overall return on investment is good, benefiting my client invoicing.
Cybersecurity architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I use Azure Web Application Firewall to secure web apps in Azure; it's cost-effective and scalable, though limited in rule customization. Logging needs improvement, and support isn't ideal. I rate it seven out of ten.
President & Chief Executive Officer at a hospitality company with 11-50 employees3.5We use Azure Web Application Firewall for cloud security due to its excellent DDoS protection and strong security controls. While cost savings were realized versus our previous Fortinet solution, the knowledge base could improve for easier access in cloud security management.
Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology5.0I use Azure Web Application Firewall with other security measures due to its superior protection for secrets and cost savings compared to alternatives. I'm satisfied with its performance and find it more reliable than AWS for high-security needs.
DevOps engineer at BrainStorm, Inc.4.5We use Azure Web Application Firewall to filter and analyze requests, benefiting from its custom rules and OWASP rule set to protect our backend. Although further AI-driven analytics would be helpful, its cost-effectiveness and control made it our preferred choice over Cloudflare.
Azure Principal Architect at Cloud Computech Consultancy4.5I use Azure Web Application Firewall to protect our web applications, valuing its WAF protection. While effective, improvements could be made by adopting features from Barracuda, such as supporting both public and private points of presence and enhancing inspection capabilities.