Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Radware Cloud WAF Service compete in the web application firewall sector. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway seems to have an edge in pricing and support, while Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in feature delivery, offering users a worthwhile investment despite its higher cost.
Features: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides SSL termination, auto-scaling, and active/active scaling for robust security and traffic management. Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced threat protection, real-time attack information, and automatic updates well-suited for dynamic threat landscapes.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could enhance its DDoS protection and API integrations. Its firewall settings and rule management might benefit from more flexibility. Radware Cloud WAF Service requires improved ease of use in its analytics and a simplified learning process for machine learning setups. There is room for offering more extensive built-in rules and configurations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, benefitting from a global support network for efficient deployment. Radware Cloud WAF Service focuses on a cloud-first approach that simplifies implementation and maintenance with superior specialized cloud security support to manage threats effectively.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers competitive pricing with a balanced cost-to-ROI ratio, particularly advantageous for enterprises invested in Azure's platform. Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a higher initial investment but offers superior threat protection and long-term security benefits, appealing to organizations that prioritize advanced defense mechanisms.
