Azure Web Application Firewall and Radware Cloud WAF Service compete in the web application security sector. Data comparisons suggest Radware Cloud WAF Service has an edge with its advanced features.
Features: Azure Web Application Firewall integrates smoothly with Microsoft's ecosystem offering ease of use, DDoS protection, and threat intelligence. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides superior machine learning capabilities, real-time threat detection, and multi-cloud flexibility, showcasing advanced cybersecurity features.
Room for Improvement: Azure Web Application Firewall could enhance advanced features like machine learning and expand flexibility to other cloud platforms. Radware Cloud WAF Service may benefit from simplifying its deployment processes and reducing the complexity in multi-cloud integrations. Improved integration guides could help customers better utilize its capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Web Application Firewall is noted for its easy deployment within the Azure services and benefits from Microsoft's wide-ranging support structures. Radware Cloud WAF, while more complex, offers specialized deployment options across various cloud providers with responsive and effective customer service, known for handling complex deployment issues.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Web Application Firewall is cost-effective for Azure ecosystem users, yielding higher ROI. Radware Cloud WAF Service entails a higher initial cost but provides superior security measures, justifying potential long-term ROI through comprehensive protection.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
I wouldn't be able to give a number, but Radware Cloud WAF does save time for our staff due to the automation and excellent detection, which is invaluable.
Radware Cloud WAF has helped reduce false positives and efforts, which in turn, improved the total cost of ownership by freeing up time to focus on other projects.
The ROI for Radware Cloud WAF Service is prominent as it is twenty percent more cost-effective compared to Imperva.
They are good at troubleshooting and configuring things.
I am very satisfied with the response from Microsoft dedicated architects if it happens that I have to call for their support.
The support provided by Radware's Emergency Response Team is excellent.
We have ERT premium support with a five-minute SLA.
They are usually very fast in response.
Some Azure applications, like the web application firewall, require a certain level of SKU for hosting setup.
Since it's a Cloud WAF, it is always scalable.
I would rate it nine out of ten in terms of handling the capacity and volume.
Anytime we've had any issues, Radware has provided us a solution, indicating its high scalability.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
I have never encountered downtime, maintenance-related issues, or latency.
The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent, and I would rate it as a ten.
There have been no issues with downtime, bugs, or glitches.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
It would be beneficial if we could perform POST requests and integrate our applications more effectively.
The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.
Improving dashboard capabilities to provide this information clearly for management is crucial.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
Pricing could be more competitive, especially for smaller customers.
I find Radware Cloud WAF to be a quite expensive product compared to others.
The pricing is not cheap; it is expensive, but it is effective.
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS.
Radware Cloud has significantly reduced attacks on our applications.
Radware Cloud WAF Service ensures our systems are stable, running smoothly, and blocking all attacks effectively.
Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.
Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.