Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Sucuri comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Radware and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0, while Sucuri Security is ranked #36. Radware holds a 1.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Read 73 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews

6,235 Views
6,235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

3,068 Views
2,209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Sucuri and Radware Cloud WAF Service are competing solutions in the web application firewall market. Radware Cloud WAF Service appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature offerings and advanced security capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security.

Features: Sucuri provides features like website monitoring, malware removal, and enhanced DDoS protection. Radware Cloud WAF Service offers real-time threat intelligence, adaptive behavioral models, and robust DDoS protection. The primary difference lies in Radware's focus on advanced security features, which can be crucial for security-conscious users.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could enhance its feature set to include more advanced security measures. It might also benefit from offering more flexible deployment options. Radware Cloud WAF Service can improve its cost efficiency and customer support responsiveness. More transparent pricing could aid potential customers in decision-making. Both products can enhance user interface complexity to streamline user interaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Cloud WAF Service offers easy deployment coupled with responsive customer service, ideal for quick implementations. Sucuri provides a more controlled deployment experience with equally engaging customer support. Radware's faster deployment can be critical for time-sensitive projects.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri is noted for its competitive setup costs, providing ROI through cost savings and robust security. Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a higher initial investment but compensates with a rich feature set and enhanced protection, which can justify the cost for those seeking top-tier security. The contrast is in Radware's higher costs linked with premium capabilities, offering different value propositions for varying budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (25th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Radware Cloud WAF Service	1.6%
Sucuri	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Ankit Tadha

SOC Analyst at Adani Enterprises Ltd

Has significantly improved threat visibility and reduced false positives through intelligent bot detection and real-time analysis

The best features of Radware Cloud WAF Service that I prefer most include the bot protection. Its deployment was very smooth and flexible when I started deploying it. The reporting and visibility feature of the Bot Manager are noteworthy, as the dashboard gives clear insight into the traffic, activity, and block threats. The AI threat intelligence feature is quite impressive. In terms of blocking unknown threats and attacks, I assess Radware Cloud WAF Service as quite impressive; if I have to rate it out of 10, I would rate it eight and a half. The automated analytics for looking at events with Radware Cloud WAF Service is generally fine, and whenever we use it, it gives almost perfect results. In API protection with Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have multiple applications that we are using currently, and whenever there is any threat related to an API, it helps us provide detailed insight. Additionally, whenever there is unusual API traffic, it helps us monitor and detect threats.

Read full review

Jagobandhu Some

Hardware Engineer at Ministry of Defense

A cost-effective choice for website security and informative support with issues related to CDN quality

One area where they could improve is in providing real-time support options because now you need to open a support ticket and wait for their response. It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance. I have found their Content Delivery Network service to be lacking in quality, and it could certainly be enhanced to provide better performance. I would also like to see improvements in the deployment process, as it currently takes more time than desirable. Another significant concern is that their service when your website is down, turns it into a static site. This means that if customers try to visit your site during downtime, they will see old content from the static site, which is not ideal. The CDN and tracking services are areas that need improvement, as well as addressing their bandwidth limitations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the reliability of the system since it's quite reliable."

"In the Radware Cloud WAF Service, the best features I find are that it's easy to use and that it's easy to identify what procedures are ongoing within this environment."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service has improved our efficiency by about 95%."

"We are achieving six to seven ms latency, so we are very much happy with the performance and the solution uses."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."

"Radware Bot Manager has been very useful. If any user tries to save a password on a mobile or a browser, it blocks that. We can see all the details about the traffic and port requests."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service's ability to protect against zero-day attacks is very good; the threat intelligence feature is excellent in the WAF and helps us protect against zero-day threats significantly, notifying us as early as possible and helping us get it resolved."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service has positively impacted my organization by providing peace of mind for the team and regulatory compliance, since having the application properly protected meets our banking field requirements."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pros

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"For people who own a personal website, this solution is worth trying out since their security solution is somewhat full-fledged."

"Rather than locate some things manually, the Sucuri plugin scans and allows us to pinpoint whether there is malware or some problem in the site."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

Cons

"They can work more on the documentation part. The documentation I found is quite vague."

"The log feature in Radware Cloud WAF Service has some limitations."

"I also want the possibility of seeing traffic in real time because I only see a dashboard with the security events, but in regards to real time, I don't see something that tells me how the traffic behavior is."

"If we want to publish services to a limited number of providers and we only want those providers to connect, we need to forward those requests to the Radware support team and they apply them, but it takes some time."

"The integration part of the Radware Cloud WAF Service is complex. Being a security operation engineer or a SOC engineer, managing complex devices can prove challenging."

"They have a portal for webinar training but because we are in a Spanish-speaking country, it is difficult for us to watch them. Not all of us are fluent in English, but most of the courses and webinars are in English. That part could be improved..."

"In some cases, if the configuration of rules is too strict or complex, there might be a possibility that genuine traffic gets blocked or considered a false positive."

"The implementation was hit or miss for the first few months. They did some tweaking and, since then, there have been no problems."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service cons

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair; it's neither particularly cheap nor expensive."

"I believe the prices are fair."

"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."

"If you plan to deploy Cloud WAF, keep in mind that the product is priced based on the megabits of traffic that pass through and the number of transactions. You should get your requirements correct up front. The active attackers feed and CDN services cost extra, so you need to negotiate these features upfront."

"When compared to Akamai and F5, Radware's pricing and licensing are highly competitive."

"The pricing is fair."

"The price is a bulk average."

"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing and cost advice

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

There are no comments.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

The main area for improvement is the flexibility of the security rule engine. Compared with some other vendors, there are fewer available conditions and limited support for complex rule logic. For ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

The product is used for the protection of our financial institution’s web applications and digital assets against DDoS attacks and other OWASP threats.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 14% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 13% of the time

F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 12% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 11% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 12% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Sucuri

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Sucuri

Compared 5% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

September 2026

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

September 2026

Download Sucuri product report

Overview

Radware Cloud WAF Service is recognized for robust security features, offering protection against threats like DDoS attacks with a seamless deployment process and advanced bot management. API security is enhanced with real-time protection and analytics, providing effective defense against common vulnerabilities.

Radware Cloud WAF is designed for web application protection, addressing issues like DDoS, SQL injections, and bot activity. Integration and deployment are straightforward, with features such as advanced bot detection, API protection, and geo-blocking enhancing threat prevention. The user-friendly interface and automated analytics offer centralized control for blocking unauthorized access and compliance assurance. Users benefit from the service's CDN component and its effectiveness against OWASP Top 10 threats, though improvements in reporting, API integration, and cost-efficiency are needed. Organizations value its role in monitoring, traffic analysis, and anomaly detection, securing both external websites and internal applications.

What are the key features of Radware Cloud WAF?

DDoS Protection: Defends against distributed denial of service attacks, ensuring uptime.
Advanced Bot Management: Identifies and mitigates unwanted bot traffic.
API Security: Provides real-time protection with minimal false positives.
Geo-blocking: Restricts access based on geographical location.
CDN Integration: Enhances content delivery and load times.
OWASP Top 10 Defense: Offers comprehensive protection against common web vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should reviewers focus on?

Improved Security: Comprehensive threat prevention bolsters defenses.
Compliance: Meets stringent security standards and industry guidelines.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control and monitoring of security measures.
User-friendly Experience: Eases deployment and ongoing management.
High Availability: Maintains consistent service availability even under attack.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Radware Cloud WAF is crucial for protecting sensitive information and maintaining service reliability. Organizations use it for monitoring, traffic analysis, and blocking unauthorized access, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of breaches.

Radware

Sucuri offers comprehensive website security solutions with features like malware detection, notification plugins, and simplified risk management via collaboration with website providers.

Sucuri specializes in website protection by combining malware detection, IP monitoring, and domain scanning to identify threats such as phishing. Although it eases security workloads and streamlines setup, some users highlight areas for enhancement, including improved .NET support and real-time customer support options. Despite needing upgrades in certain aspects like PCI testing and DDoS protection, its strengths lie in securing WordPress sites and managing web application firewalls effectively.

What are Sucuri's Key Features?

Malware Detection: Identifies and alerts users of website infections efficiently.
IP Monitoring: Provides analytics and visualization for tracking IP requests.
Domain Scanning: Detects malware and phishing across domain names.
Collaboration with Providers: Works with website providers for risk mitigation.
Website Security Simplification: Streamlines security processes with minimum effort.

What Benefits or ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Security Workload: Automation minimizes the need for constant manual monitoring.
Enhanced Threat Identification: Proactive notifications help in swift risk management.
Streamlined Setup: Easy deployment reduces implementation time.
Trust in Risk Updates: Reliable backend notifications ensure timely threat awareness.

In specific industries, Sucuri is implemented to safeguard WordPress environments and manage traffic using web application firewalls. Organizations often utilize its IP blocking and geolocation features for enhanced website protection, benefiting from its malware cleanup capabilities in various sectors.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

September 2026

Free Report: Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.