Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Sucuri comparison

Radware and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Sucuri Security is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Radware holds a 1.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Read 32 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews

2,701 Views
481 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

683 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Sucuri and Radware Cloud WAF Service are competing solutions in the web application firewall market. Radware Cloud WAF Service appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature offerings and advanced security capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security.

Features: Sucuri provides features like website monitoring, malware removal, and enhanced DDoS protection. Radware Cloud WAF Service offers real-time threat intelligence, adaptive behavioral models, and robust DDoS protection. The primary difference lies in Radware's focus on advanced security features, which can be crucial for security-conscious users.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could enhance its feature set to include more advanced security measures. It might also benefit from offering more flexible deployment options. Radware Cloud WAF Service can improve its cost efficiency and customer support responsiveness. More transparent pricing could aid potential customers in decision-making. Both products can enhance user interface complexity to streamline user interaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Cloud WAF Service offers easy deployment coupled with responsive customer service, ideal for quick implementations. Sucuri provides a more controlled deployment experience with equally engaging customer support. Radware's faster deployment can be critical for time-sensitive projects.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri is noted for its competitive setup costs, providing ROI through cost savings and robust security. Radware Cloud WAF Service involves a higher initial investment but compensates with a rich feature set and enhanced protection, which can justify the cost for those seeking top-tier security. The contrast is in Radware's higher costs linked with premium capabilities, offering different value propositions for varying budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (15th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Tanuj-Garg

CIO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

API discovery, bot defense, and DDoS capability optimize application security and development

I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment. Closely monitoring alerts during this period is essential to avoid false positives. There's an alert noise issue; during the early stages, we received a high volume of alerts for minor issues, requiring collaboration with the SOC team to fine-tune thresholds and concentrate on genuine threats. The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.

Read full review

Akshit Malik

Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides website security, safeguarding against various threats and effective protection against DDoS attacks

The initial setup is moderate because it's neither too easy nor too hard. Sucuri provides us with many ways to set up our site, handle the routing, and perform the necessary configurations. It's deployed on the cloud. We used the managed service of Sucuri and then routed all the requests from Sucuri to our AWS platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal."

"The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service has improved our efficiency by about 95%."

"Radware Bot Manager has been very useful. If any user tries to save a password on a mobile or a browser, it blocks that. We can see all the details about the traffic and port requests."

"Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."

"The solution requires very little maintenance; we install it, it works without any problems, is reliable, and we can almost forget about it."

"From a financial point of view, we no longer need to appropriate more horsepower to our backend web servers constantly to service these requests because Cloud WAF is preventing malicious bots from accessing our web page. It reduced the load on our backend."

"Geo-blocking is one of the most valuable features we use the most; most of our users are in North, Central, and South America, so we use geo-blocking to block access from other countries."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pros

"The initial setup was very easy."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

Cons

"Additionally, alert messages for DDoS attacks or other things take time to reach us, causing delays in our response."

"Sometimes, I encounter issues with password reset."

"Management often asks for detailed reporting on attacks such as botnet and zero-day attacks, including the number of attacks within a month, week, or day. Improving dashboard capabilities to provide this information clearly for management is crucial."

"Our only complaint is the reporting on the DDoS side. We also use Radware for on-premises DDoS protection and their Vision product. I just want to give paint you an example. We face so many Layer 3 and Layer 4 DDoS attacks on Cloud WAF. The reporting on those types of attacks can be improved."

"There is a lot more that is expected from Radware's automated analytics for looking at events. There needs to be more context of where protection is required these days."

"An area of improvement is the visibility at the attack level."

"Radware could improve technical support by resolving cases in fewer days. This would enhance the overall experience with the product."

"The dashboard of Radware Cloud WAF Service has room for improvement. While it works effectively, it can feel complex and might need some initial guidance, but once users become familiar with it, the operation becomes smooth."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service cons

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."

"When compared to Akamai and F5, Radware's pricing and licensing are highly competitive."

"I am not directly involved in pricing and setup cost discussions, but it seems that Radware offers a more cost-effective solution compared to F5. It is considered a good value for our budget."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service falls within a mid-range price bracket compared to other web application firewall solutions."

"For the current market, the price for Radware Cloud WAF Service is exactly where we want it to be."

"The pricing is fair; it's neither particularly cheap nor expensive."

"We are paying $20,000 annually for six licenses that provide basic WAF functionality."

"The price is a bulk average."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing and cost advice

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

We are choosing Radware Cloud WAF Service over traditional WAF because it has API first behavioral protection, advanced bot defense, and layer 7 web DDoS capability. It was chosen because of the hy...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sucuri?

The initial setup was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?

The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sucuri?

The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 29% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 18% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 47% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 19% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri

Compared 8% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2025

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

May 2025

Download Sucuri product report

Overview

Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.

Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.

Radware

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Free Report: Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.