Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Uplynk comparison

Radware and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Uplynk is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Radware holds a 1.7% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Uplynk and Radware Cloud WAF Service are major contenders in video streaming and web application security. Uplynk holds the upper hand in pricing and ROI satisfaction, while Radware excels in robust security features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Uplynk offers adaptive streaming, streamlined content management, and multi-platform delivery for seamless video streaming. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides DDoS protection, web application firewall capabilities, and threat analytics, enhancing online security for businesses.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could enhance its security features, offer more advanced analytics, and expand geographic server presence. Radware Cloud WAF Service should simplify deployment processes, reduce reliance on expert knowledge, and improve automated reporting on their dashboard.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk is noted for its easy deployment and responsive customer support, enabling quick start-up and problem resolution. Radware Cloud WAF Service emphasizes configurability and a robust deployment model but may require higher expertise, supported by strong customer service for issue management.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk provides competitive, transparent pricing, delivering a solid ROI with its efficient content delivery services. Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive security focus, offering a promising ROI for enterprises needing thorough web security, making it a smart investment for those prioritizing secure online infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 4.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Radware Cloud WAF Service	1.7%
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall	4.0%
Uplynk	1.5%
Other	92.8%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Dean Barisic

CTO at PlayNirvana

Advanced security reporting has protected high-traffic betting platforms from constant attacks

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we have a dedicated IT team for that, and I'm not involved with Cloudflare much anymore. But if I were to compare them to F5, I would like to see more features that F5 offers. F5 has an option to bring the whole infrastructure, the whole WAF and all their packages, Bot Management, and everything else on your infrastructure. You need to install certain services from their side, and then you can choose if you would like requests to hit your servers immediately or if requests need to be proxied through F5 backbone. That would be a nice addition because we have 90% of the traffic as legit traffic coming from whitelisted servers. If it comes from whitelisted servers, I don't need to go every request through the backbone; I could easily just IP whitelist everything. Then I could maybe have Bot Management on my infrastructure that drastically reduces the price of Cloudflare. I would like to see Push CDN more improved in the next release of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network. From our perspective, if we have a listener that listens for stock updates, I would just need to have one processor that pushes those updates to the Cloudflare API, and then Cloudflare would broadcast that message to all listeners. Cloudflare will check the order of the message, and if you, as a customer, are not connected or have some kind of network issue, when you reconnect, you will receive the latest state and missing updates.

Read full review

Ankit Tadha

SOC Analyst at Adani Enterprises Ltd

Has significantly improved threat visibility and reduced false positives through intelligent bot detection and real-time analysis

The best features of Radware Cloud WAF Service that I prefer most include the bot protection. Its deployment was very smooth and flexible when I started deploying it. The reporting and visibility feature of the Bot Manager are noteworthy, as the dashboard gives clear insight into the traffic, activity, and block threats. The AI threat intelligence feature is quite impressive. In terms of blocking unknown threats and attacks, I assess Radware Cloud WAF Service as quite impressive; if I have to rate it out of 10, I would rate it eight and a half. The automated analytics for looking at events with Radware Cloud WAF Service is generally fine, and whenever we use it, it gives almost perfect results. In API protection with Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have multiple applications that we are using currently, and whenever there is any threat related to an API, it helps us provide detailed insight. Additionally, whenever there is unusual API traffic, it helps us monitor and detect threats.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Very glad the WAF rulesets works out of box, and requires very little tuning or maintenance."

"I have not had any issues with this solution, and I would recommend it to others who are interested in using it."

"The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10."

"It is configurable via API."

"It's pretty convenient and pretty easy to set up and run. And then kind of for static content, it also offers caching."

"The product has a valuable security control functionality."

"This solution does a good job of preventing web application attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting attacks."

"I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros

"Other companies considering using Radware Cloud WAF Service will find a very robust tool that has different types of applications for managing all the APIs, all the applications, and controlling the security of all the entities."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service offers better protection and can even provide significantly better security."

"The best feature is the SQL injection signatures, and another is the DDoS protection. Radware is more efficient than other solutions."

"My experience with the technical support of Radware Cloud WAF Service is that they are excellent, and I have established a strong relationship with the executive leadership up to Roy, the CEO."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service blocks threats effectively, providing a comprehensive report that shows the traffic and denied traffic from malicious IPs or specific countries, so I am satisfied."

"The real-time BLA detection and mitigation processes have significantly enhanced our threat management with Radware Cloud WAF Service."

"DDoS protection is a valuable feature that works efficiently."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

Cons

"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit."

"Support can be challenging at times."

"We don't even use Cloudflare Bot Management because it's too expensive; you need to pay per request, and it's much cheaper to get one or two additional machines."

"The user interface is very simple and straightforward, but users need knowledge about DNS to accomplish tasks."

"We have noticed some latency when the call goes through the firewall. That could be improved."

"The learning curve was steep initially."

"The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts."

"The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced"

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons

"I'm not sure about how much historical traffic data we can access. Knowing the ability to view traffic from six months back would be beneficial for audit and compliance purposes, especially if an attack happens on an application."

"The pricing means it prices itself out of a lot of people's budgets, which is a significant concern."

"There is a lot more that is expected from Radware's automated analytics for looking at events. There needs to be more context of where protection is required these days."

"The dashboard of Radware Cloud WAF Service has room for improvement. While it works effectively, it can feel complex and might need some initial guidance, but once users become familiar with it, the operation becomes smooth."

"I would like to see an improvement in the twenty-four-seven support service."

"Radware does not have much online training available to help customers get the most out of this solution."

"I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment."

"Regarding aspects that Radware Cloud WAF Service could improve, I would suggest that at the start, on the home interface, having dashboards that help us summarize and extract metrics would be beneficial."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service cons

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."

"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."

"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."

"What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."

"It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly"

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

"It is not too pricey."

"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"If you plan to deploy Cloud WAF, keep in mind that the product is priced based on the megabits of traffic that pass through and the number of transactions. You should get your requirements correct up front. The active attackers feed and CDN services cost extra, so you need to negotiate these features upfront."

"The pricing is fair."

"I am not directly involved in pricing and setup cost discussions, but it seems that Radware offers a more cost-effective solution compared to F5. It is considered a good value for our budget."

"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."

"For the current market, the price for Radware Cloud WAF Service is exactly where we want it to be."

"The pricing is fair. We compared Radware to others using industry reviews and Radware is at the top right now."

"When compared to Akamai and F5, Radware's pricing and licensing are highly competitive."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service falls within a mid-range price bracket compared to other web application firewall solutions."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing and cost advice

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	45

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

We are using Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools with their Zero Trust, so e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

The cost of Radware Cloud WAF Service is actually a bit high, but given all these benefits, the investment makes sense.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

To improve Radware Cloud WAF Service, I believe it should enable full application and API coverage to ensure all web ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

My main use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service is protection against OWASP Top 10 and zero-day attacks, API discovery...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. B...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal softwa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 14% of the time

F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 12% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 7% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 10% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

June 2026

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2026

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall integrates DDoS protection, load balancing, and firewall capabilities. Its ease of use, configurability, and robust security measures make it a versatile choice for protecting web applications.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall provides a comprehensive defense against threats with advanced reporting and robust security measures. It includes DNS integration, rate limiting, and extensive rule sets, all within a SaaS model that allows API configurability. Users value its caching, scalability, and pricing, although enhancements are needed in rate-limiting and third-party integration. Improvements in customer support, especially in India, real-time controls, and user documentation are also desired. Users seek a more intuitive dashboard, better log management, and improved alert systems, along with multitenancy capabilities and enhanced reporting.

What are the key features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

DDoS Protection: Shields applications from denial-of-service attacks
Load Balancing: Ensures efficient traffic distribution
DNS Integration: Enhances domain name system security
Rate Limiting: Controls traffic flow and reduces abuse
Extensive Rule Sets: Offers customizable security rules

What benefits and ROI can users find in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs
Pricing: Offers reasonable pricing structure
Caching: Improves application performance and speed
Configurable Security: Provides customizable defense settings
Efficient Management: Simplifies security and application control

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall finds application in industries like banking and retail by acting as a comprehensive security gateway, managing authentication and authorization while protecting web applications from malicious Layer 7 traffic. It also implements load balancing, CDN, and zero-trust policies, supported by advanced reporting, analytics tools, and threat scoring to meet specific industry needs.

Cloudflare

Radware Cloud WAF Service is recognized for robust security features, offering protection against threats like DDoS attacks with a seamless deployment process and advanced bot management. API security is enhanced with real-time protection and analytics, providing effective defense against common vulnerabilities.

Radware Cloud WAF is designed for web application protection, addressing issues like DDoS, SQL injections, and bot activity. Integration and deployment are straightforward, with features such as advanced bot detection, API protection, and geo-blocking enhancing threat prevention. The user-friendly interface and automated analytics offer centralized control for blocking unauthorized access and compliance assurance. Users benefit from the service's CDN component and its effectiveness against OWASP Top 10 threats, though improvements in reporting, API integration, and cost-efficiency are needed. Organizations value its role in monitoring, traffic analysis, and anomaly detection, securing both external websites and internal applications.

What are the key features of Radware Cloud WAF?

DDoS Protection: Defends against distributed denial of service attacks, ensuring uptime.
Advanced Bot Management: Identifies and mitigates unwanted bot traffic.
API Security: Provides real-time protection with minimal false positives.
Geo-blocking: Restricts access based on geographical location.
CDN Integration: Enhances content delivery and load times.
OWASP Top 10 Defense: Offers comprehensive protection against common web vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should reviewers focus on?

Improved Security: Comprehensive threat prevention bolsters defenses.
Compliance: Meets stringent security standards and industry guidelines.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control and monitoring of security measures.
User-friendly Experience: Eases deployment and ongoing management.
High Availability: Maintains consistent service availability even under attack.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Radware Cloud WAF is crucial for protecting sensitive information and maintaining service reliability. Organizations use it for monitoring, traffic analysis, and blocking unauthorized access, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of breaches.

Radware

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

Information Not Available

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

June 2026

Free Report: Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.