Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Uplynk comparison

Radware and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Uplynk is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.8. Radware holds a 1.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Read 32 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews

2,701 Views
481 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

467 Views
67 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 5, 2025

Uplynk and Radware Cloud WAF Service are competitive products in the fields of video delivery and cloud security. Users have found Uplynk's pricing and support more satisfactory, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service is favored for its robust features, making it a worthwhile investment despite higher costs.

Features: Uplynk provides seamless video streaming, adaptive bitrate technology, and device compatibility to ensure efficient media delivery. Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced threat detection, DDoS protection, and real-time analytics, which are essential for web application security.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could enhance its security measures and support for more niche media formats. There is room to improve cross-platform integration. Streamlining analytics could also be beneficial. Radware Cloud WAF Service could improve ease of setup. There could be enhancements in user training resources. Simplification of the analytics dashboard would be beneficial for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk is noted for straightforward integration and responsive customer service, minimizing technical challenges. Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a complex setup but provides comprehensive deployment assistance and expert support to guide through the process.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk is valued for its competitive pricing, offering rapid ROI with low setup costs. Radware Cloud WAF Service requires a higher initial investment, justified by long-term returns in enhanced security and protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Radware Cloud WAF Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (9th), CDN (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Tanuj-Garg

CIO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

API discovery, bot defense, and DDoS capability optimize application security and development

I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment. Closely monitoring alerts during this period is essential to avoid false positives. There's an alert noise issue; during the early stages, we received a high volume of alerts for minor issues, requiring collaboration with the SOC team to fine-tune thresholds and concentrate on genuine threats. The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.

Read full review

Eduardo Oviedo-Blanco

CTO and Game Developer at Solospace

A CDN solution to enhance loading times and streamline navigation

When one of the primary nodes spanning from North to South America, from the northern US to the southern US, became operational, it had a big impact. It can be challenging to explain its advantages to clients. The technical nature of the marketing material is too technical for stakeholders. Integrating the solution was straightforward, requiring no extra effort. Edgio Global CDN operates, resembling familiar cloud services but offering elevated functionality. Unlike platforms such as Google Cloud Platform or RIN geared towards development teams, Edgio emphasizes client-facing services that are integral to our operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Geo-blocking is one of the most valuable features we use the most; most of our users are in North, Central, and South America, so we use geo-blocking to block access from other countries."

"It has significantly reduced attacks on our applications."

"I particularly appreciate the low administrative burden of this solution, as well as the excellent monitoring tools."

"The features I find most valuable about Radware Cloud WAF Service are primarily rate-limiting, geo-blocking, web DDoS protection, and some other basic features."

"Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."

"With the current visibility dashboard, we can now obtain insight into the nature of attacks, identify attackers, and detect top IP or threat regions."

"It provides the first level of defense against external threats trying to come into the environment, but it's one of the many toolkits we use."

"Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

Cons

"Radware needs to improve the certificate renewal process for customers who want to be secured with HTTPS."

"The implementation was hit or miss for the first few months. They did some tweaking and, since then, there have been no problems."

"The primary area for improvement is in issue detection and understanding whether a log is a false positive. It can sometimes be a challenge to take the data of a given security event and determine if it's a genuine threat using a Wiki etc."

"Cloud WAF's management portal lacks many indicators, and the interface could be more user-friendly. It should provide more detailed information on events, possible solutions, and what each event means. While it does give you the event and block part, it doesn't give you a solution. Let's say, for example, someone wants to go into an SQL injection and find a possible solution other than the blocking part, there are no details. It would be good to have possible solutions or the ability to create an automated report to send to the developers in the portal."

"We've had some issues with putting certificates in."

"The connection between the front and back ends could be improved."

"Radware does not have much online training available to help customers get the most out of this solution."

"It would be ideal if Radware could offer a bundled package that includes Cloud WAF, web DDoS protection, bot manager, and Alteon for a more comprehensive security solution."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."

"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."

"The pricing is fair. We compared Radware to others using industry reviews and Radware is at the top right now."

"The pricing is fair; it's neither particularly cheap nor expensive."

"I believe the prices are fair."

"I am not directly involved in pricing and setup cost discussions, but it seems that Radware offers a more cost-effective solution compared to F5. It is considered a good value for our budget."

"We are paying $20,000 annually for six licenses that provide basic WAF functionality."

"The price is a bulk average."

More Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing and cost advice

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?

We are choosing Radware Cloud WAF Service over traditional WAF because it has API first behavioral protection, advanced bot defense, and layer 7 web DDoS capability. It was chosen because of the hy...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 29% of the time

AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 18% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 17% of the time

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 15% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 14% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service

June 2025

Download Radware Cloud WAF Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.

Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.

Radware

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Free Report: Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Cloud WAF Service vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.