Oracle SPARC Servers Reviews

We are using Oracle SPARC Servers for our oracle EBS. 

We can install only Oracle Solaris on Oracle SPARC Servers, we cannot install any other operating system.

The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization.

The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system.

I have been using Oracle SPARC Servers for approximately seven years.

The stability of the solution is excellent, it is reliable. Once you install and configure it then it'll run smoothly. It will not give you any issues.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution. We have plans to increase the usage of the solution. We have some older hardware and we will be replacing it with the latest model of Oracle SPARC Servers. 

The technical support from the vendor quality depends upon the issue. Sometimes they will give you very good support and other times they will pass you on to someone. It will depend upon the issue.

Previously we used Intel server then we migrate to Solaris. We switched because we heard about the high performance of Oracle hardware and software works.

The setup is simple, but the engineer has to have knowledge about Solaris to manage it. It is not like Linux or another operating system. It's a little bit different compared to Red Hat and other Linux variations. The full deployment takes approximately two days.

We used the help of the vendors to deploy it. After that we are have been managing it, even though if it requires any upgrade or anything, we are doing it in-house. We don't require other people for maintenance.

Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers.

Once we cross five years, the parts will not be locally maintained by Oracle. Sometimes we need to wait for a week, 10 days or a month to get the replacement. Even though you are having support from Oracle,  you have to wait. It is a very bad thing.

When rating the reliability and sustainability of the solution I will rate it nine out of ten, but when it comes to supporting the solution when it becomes old, I rate it a six out of ten.

But I need just one digit, Ali, like in general. So what will it be?

I rate Oracle SPARC Servers a six out of ten.

Overall I gave the solution a six out of ten because once we start using Oracle SPARC Servers, it's very difficult to get out of it because it requires a platform migration. Many things will make it difficult to move to another architecture afterward.

We use it as an automation tool for the parts of the ships we are building. The firms that produce these parts, can pull the specifications from the server.

Before I came on board they bought Oracle SPARC Servers and the migrations for different environments are a major improvement.

I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU.

I would like to see a reduced price point.

I have been using Oracle SPARC Servers for the past year. I have been working in the industry for the past twenty years.

Oracle SPARC Servers are definitely stable.

There is scalability. I believe there are around a couple hundred individuals who have the application running. I have done a lot of migrations from five thousand servers, and zones, into LDAPs on the L five servers.

Technical support is good for us.

Positive

We are currently using HP and Dell servers on parallel systems.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. However having a knowledge base with Solaris that is running on it, then it is not that difficult to work with. At least you know what you are doing with it.

We did the installation in-house and not through a third party.

The price is expensive however there is better hardware installed for the price. The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it.

I am satisfied with the service that is delivered. I would give it an eight out of ten.

In India, we have a development center for implementation. I am in the FinTech industry. We have a large amount of customers that have implemented SPARC.

The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible.

There is a huge difference between the M Series and the T Series. They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models.

If I'm calculating the M Series, there is a large amount of core. The T Series has less, but there is no actual model we can fix up. When we actually require some support, we are going for the logical partitioning for two. At that point, when you are calculating processing power and memory, IBM offers more choices, whereas it's actually very difficult for Oracle.

I have been working with Oracle for more than 12 years.

It's stable and runs smoothly.

It's scalable.

Technical support could be improved.

I also have experience with IBM.

Compared to IBM, setup is much simpler.

We worked with a third-party integrator.

We have seen ROI. The ROI is better than IBM.

The licensing is flexible.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.