HPE Apollo Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.1% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Oracle’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

HPE Apollo Systems

Read 24 HPE Apollo Systems reviews

2,059 Views
1,791 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle SPARC Servers

Read 8 Oracle SPARC Servers reviews

1,489 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HPE Apollo Systems

Oracle SPARC Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HPE Apollo Systems and Oracle SPARC Servers are key players in enterprise computing. Users favor Oracle SPARC Servers for their robust features, despite HPE Apollo Systems' competitive pricing and support.

Features: HPE Apollo Systems are favored for their high-density, modular design, flexible configurations, and scalability, optimized for data-intensive tasks. Oracle SPARC Servers are recognized for reliability, security, and superior processing power, ideal for complex workloads.

Room for Improvement: HPE Apollo Systems could improve power consumption, better integration with existing ecosystems, and user experience. Oracle SPARC Servers need enhanced documentation, improved user support services, and simplified user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Apollo Systems are known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making them user-friendly initially. Oracle SPARC Servers, despite a steeper learning curve, offer consistent post-deployment support with a knowledgeable team.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Apollo Systems provide cost-effective solutions with scalable configurations offering good ROI. Oracle SPARC Servers, while more expensive, justify higher costs with substantial ROI through performance and security advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Apollo Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Density Optimized Servers (2nd)

Oracle SPARC Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Apollo Systems is 4.1%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SPARC Servers is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle SPARC Servers	3.8%
HPE Apollo Systems	4.1%
Other	92.1%

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Gökhan DURMAZ

Account Manager at TD SYNNEX

High-quality integration and strong support have optimized our rack server operations

HPE Apollo Systems is a good product because it has better support and best quality with integrity. When I speak about integrity, I speak about GPU integration or other integrations such as GPU integration, backup software integration, and hypervisor integration. Regarding the integration of high-speed interconnectors in HPE Apollo Systems, they impact computational tasks because the high-speed interconnect affects performance. I don't remember the specifics. Regarding the cooling technologies, they help to reduce operational costs. The positive impact I see from HPE Apollo Systems is that support is good and quality is good. In general, HPE Apollo Systems appears to be for rack servers with some optimization capabilities.

Read full review

Marcel Hofstetter

Oracle ACE Director "Solaris " / CEO / Enterprise Consultant at JomaSoft

Stability has reduced hardware refresh needs and supports high-performance workloads

The best features Oracle SPARC Servers offer are that they are very stable and with high performance. Regarding the high performance aspect, I can say that they are great for databases and Java applications. Oracle SPARC Servers have positively impacted our organization because it's very good for our budget since we can use the system for so many years and don't have to buy new systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Taking into consideration the cost, HPE gave us the ability to actually do what we wanted to do."

"Apollo Systems provide stuff that standard services do not, more HTDs, more compute power, at very reasonable pricing."

"Tech support has been outstanding."

"HPE Apollo Systems is a good product because it has better support and best quality with integrity."

"We usually use three blades for two-rack units, and with enough storage, it's really a small system with a powerful CPU, powerful hard drives, powerful disks."

"Stability has been extremely good."

"HPE Apollo's most valuable feature is the ability to expand our storage capacity."

"The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience."

More HPE Apollo Systems pros

"The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization."

"Oracle SPARC Servers have positively impacted our organization because it's very good for our budget since we can use the system for so many years and don't have to buy new systems."

"The performance is the best feature."

"I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU."

"The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible."

"The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used."

"Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers."

Cons

"If the workload is not purely sequential, then performance in the IO is less than optimal because it's optimized for streaming processing."

"If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo."

"Big stability issues with the CPU on the first generation which made them virtually unusable."

"Our first batch of Apollo servers that we got were so new that it was just hard to know kind of what to expect from HPE and what they wanted to deliver to us."

"Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall."

"HPE Apollo Systems is a bit expensive, and there are some issues with scalability."

"I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding."

"There is a shared battery for all cache controllers in the node. When you have to replace that element, you have to take down all three nodes and not just one."

More HPE Apollo Systems cons

"Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux."

"I would like to see a reduced price point."

"They have declared the end of life of the hardware."

"They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models."

"The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system."

"Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

"Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."

"It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."

"The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."

"Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."

"Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."

"My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"The licensing is flexible."

"The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."

"The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."

"Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?

Some features could be added to HPE Apollo Systems in the future, and I feel that some capability is needed. HPE Apollo Systems is a bit expensive, and there are some issues with scalability. Two f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?

I have been distributing this product for three years. I don't have specific use cases, and everything about the major use case for HPE Apollo Systems is good. I don't know the purpose clients are ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Apollo?

I am not using these products today, and I do not work with some specific firewalls. My company is TD Synnex, a distributor company, and I work for this company. My email is , and my first name is ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it's all okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SPARC Servers?

Oracle SPARC Servers are fine as they are. There are no additional improvements needed for Oracle SPARC Servers that I haven't mentioned yet.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My main use case for Oracle SPARC Servers is that they are very stable and excellent to virtualize and to consolidate because of their virtualization solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XR-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

Intel Server System vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 23% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems

March 2026

Download HPE Apollo Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

February 2026

Download Oracle SPARC Servers product report

Also Known As

HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo

No data available

Overview

The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Weta Digital

University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

March 2026

Free Report: HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.