OpenText UFT One Reviews

Name: OpenText UFT One
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4 (90 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

4.0 out of 5

90 reviews
87% willing to recommend

4,812 followers

Post review

What is OpenText UFT One?

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.Read white paper

Get the OpenText UFT One Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One, SonarQube, Tricentis Tosca and more!

OpenText UFT One is the #2 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Mobile App Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Regression Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools, and #4 ranked solution in top API Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText UFT One an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. OpenText UFT One is most commonly compared to SonarQube: OpenText UFT One vs SonarQube. OpenText UFT One is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 75% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 19% of all views.

Helped 793,295 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Vinod-Parmar

Manager, Technical Services Owner at Insignia

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years. My company did not face any issues with the testing capabilities of the product, but we need to consider rationalizing the technology and toolsets present in our organization. There were some challenges with the product, but there were people in our company who were not from the development team to take care of the part that involved scripting. With the product, most of the automation part was taken care of by the testing team in our company. There weren't many differences in our company due to the issues in the solution because of how our company had outsourced certain work for which we were paying anyway.

Read full review

Robertino Catalin Ionescu

Department Manager of Testing Automation Centre at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

We are using Micro Focus UFT One for automating the test cases The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage…

Read full review

OpenText UFT One mindshare

Product category:

As of July 2024, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 9.9%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jun 7, 2024

Valuable Features

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."
"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."

Room for Improvement

"The tool needs to improve its performance since it can become heavy."
"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."
"One area for improvement is its occasional slowness."

Pricing

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."
"The pricing of the product is an issue."
"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText UFT One Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Educational Organization

Transportation Company

Media Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Construction Company

University

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Logistics Company

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Consumer Goods Company

Engineering Company

Legal Firm

Hospitality Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Wellness & Fitness Company

Performing Arts

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Compare OpenText UFT One with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText UFT One

OpenText UFT One was previously known as Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP).