OpenText Functional Testing and Apigee are top performers in testing and API management. Apigee has a strong edge in API management and developer support, while OpenText excels with multi-platform compatibility.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports desktop, web, and mobile testing, integrates with numerous technologies, and offers built-in object repositories. Apigee provides comprehensive API management, strong analytics tools, and a developer portal for seamless user experience.
Room for Improvement: OpenText faces challenges in browser compatibility and IDE functionalities, and could benefit from speed optimizations. Apigee needs enhanced developer support, better integration capabilities, and clearer pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is largely on-premises, supported by technical assistance, though with noted slow response times. Apigee allows flexible deployment options, including hybrid models, but requires improvements in complex support services.
Pricing and ROI: Both solutions are expensive. OpenText's pricing is justified by its feature set and compatibility, providing ROI through test automation. Apigee's cost aligns with enterprise needs but suggests potential pricing adjustments for accessibility.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
They are responsive and provide assistance even during production issues.
In the past two years, I have been experiencing less assistance.
The customer service and support are cooperative and effective in providing insights and solutions during challenges.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
Adding extra Cassandra databases is complex.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability.
Apigee only allows validation of transactions up to a four-hour period, which requires manual hovering over the date and time.
Apigee should also incorporate these capabilities, especially in the on-premises version.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Apigee's product cost is quite high compared to other products.
Apigee is high-priced, suitable for large enterprises where the benefit aligns with the cost.
Apigee is perceived as slightly costly compared to other tools in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
It provides all the necessary capabilities for current technologies, enabling communication and translation between protocols, along with supporting stringent security features.
Apigee's analytics capabilities aid in monitoring and optimizing APIs, which are also beneficial for our operations.
We rely on Elasticsearch to monitor traffic, which provides high visibility and control and surpasses Apigee in certain features.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText Functional Testing has an impressive ability to connect to mobile devices and its ability to test so many different types of software, whether it be mainframe, APIs, mobile, web, or desktop.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 13.2% |
| Apigee | 2.1% |
| Other | 84.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
Apigee offers API management, analytics, and developer portals with robust security, scalability, and flexibility. Its hybrid deployment ensures data privacy, while analytics tools support insightful decision-making, making it suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive API solutions.
Apigee provides a seamless platform for managing APIs, integrating external and internal applications. It serves as an API gateway, featuring robust security and scalability, supporting OAuth and rate-limiting policies. Organizations appreciate its ease of use, integration capabilities, and documented resources. The hybrid deployment model ensures private data remains on-premise, while the orchestration layer increases security. With a drag-and-drop interface and customization options, policy management becomes straightforward. Its analytics and monitoring tools offer insights into traffic patterns and API performance. However, users desire improvements in role-based access, code versioning integration, and traffic handling. Suggestions include enhanced security, support, automation, and a more flexible pricing model.
What are Apigee's Key Features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Apigee is extensively used for developing proxies, implementing security protocols, and managing APIs. Organizations leverage its capabilities to facilitate seamless API interactions, fostering developer onboarding and API customization. The platform supports API gateways for enhanced security, scalability, and insights, proving crucial for managing extensive application networks.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
