Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Functional Testing Logo

OpenText Functional Testing Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is OpenText Functional Testing?

Featured OpenText Functional Testing reviews

OpenText Functional Testing mindshare

As of July 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 9.4%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsJul 22, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJul 22, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis ToscaJul 22, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test CloudJul 22, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing vs BrowserStackJul 22, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.119.2%96%111 interviewsAdd to research
Katalon Studio3.9N/A89%47 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Retailer
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
University
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Media Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%

Compare OpenText Functional Testing with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing

OpenText Functional Testing customers

Related questions

 

OpenText Functional Testing reviews

Sort by:
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot user
QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Jan 2, 2025
Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

Pros

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

Cons

"UFT still requires some coding. "
MH
Engineer at Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Jul 8, 2025
Use descriptive programming and object repository efficiently with potential for improving storage and responsiveness

Cons

"Additionally, there are hanging issues where it becomes unresponsive, which can be improved."
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing. Updated July 2025
862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot user
Senior Manager at Deloitte
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Nov 30, 2024
Achieves significant ROI with market-leading features but needs a better user interface

Pros

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."

Cons

"The user interface could be improved"
AG
Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Nov 8, 2024
Efficient automation with AI-enhanced testing features

Pros

"The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests. "

Cons

"There could be improvements in report export features similar to SmartBear."
DW
QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Apr 5, 2025
Transition to database validation addresses browser dependency issues while scripting in a limited language

Pros

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."

Cons

"We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing."
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot user
CTO at Marco Technology
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Sep 18, 2024
Has an initial setup phase that is easy but needs to be made more script-based

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy and straightforward."

Cons

"Previously, the product was a script-based solution. Presently, the tool offers non-script, no-code, or low-code functionalities, making it an area where improvements are required."
Victor Horescu - PeerSpot user
Owner at iQST
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Sep 10, 2024
Provides recording option for test script creation and maintenance

Pros

"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."

Cons

"The solution needs better marketing, training, promotion, and visibility because it is not visible."
GG
QA automation Architect Manager at BMO Financial
Verified user of OpenText Functional Testing
Jun 7, 2024
Useful for validation and functional test cases

Pros

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool. "

Cons

"The tool needs to improve its performance since it can become heavy. "