OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros and cons

Name: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.2 (84 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

84 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers comprehensive load testing across varied applications, supporting numerous protocols. Centralized testing streamlines upgrades and script management. Its integration with Dynatrace and Splunk enhances monitoring and performance analysis. Despite its scalability and detailed reporting, high costs, integration issues, less responsive support, and reporting inflexibility are notable concerns. Scalability challenges during high concurrent user demands emphasize the need for optimized resource management.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) enables agile issue-finding testing and provides a centralized location for performance tests, facilitating collaboration across teams.

This tool supports a wide range of applications, including web-based systems, SAP, Oracle, and mobile applications, showcasing its versatility in handling different technologies.

It allows seamless scaling of virtual users for load testing, enabling the testing of applications under substantial load with high reliability and extended load generation capabilities.

The ability to integrate easily with third-party tools like Dynatrace and Splunk enhances monitoring and performance analysis, making it a comprehensive choice for enterprise performance testing.

The feature-rich environment, including recording, replaying, and the ability to handle various protocols, provides flexibility and extensive options for comprehensive performance testing strategies.

CONS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is criticized for its high cost compared to other tools, driving some customers to switch to alternatives like JMeter and RPT.

Technical support is noted as an area needing improvement, with challenges in responsiveness and coordination compared to when the product was owned by HP.

There are concerns about the complexity and time-consuming nature of installation and upgrade processes, leading to frequent re-installations and difficulties launching the server.

The TruClient protocol requires significant resources, causing issues with memory usage, and calls for optimization to reduce CPU and RAM consumption.

Improvement is needed in integration capabilities, particularly with cloud-based load generators like AWS, and enhanced monitoring tool compatibility is desired.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Pros review quotes

it_user471411

Manager Performance Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Nov 4, 2016

We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing full-time, so that they in an agile fashion, on demand can go ahead and get real issue-finding testing done.