OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

OpenText and Progress Software are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Progress Software is ranked #15. OpenText holds a 6.5% mindshare in LTT, compared to Progress Software’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 84 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,306 Views
1,799 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,142 Views
183 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Telerik Test Studio compete in the software testing market. LoadRunner Enterprise has the upper hand in performance testing scalability for complex enterprise applications, while Telerik Test Studio excels in user-friendly functional testing and integration capabilities.

Features: LoadRunner Enterprise offers high scalability, powerful performance testing capabilities for enterprise apps, and distributed testing options. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive integration, user-friendly functional testing, and PDF validation features.

Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Enterprise could enhance its user interface and simplify deployment processes. Improved cost-effectiveness and additional protocol support may also be beneficial. Telerik Test Studio might need more advanced customization options, enhanced performance testing capabilities, and improved reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward deployment process with good customer support. LoadRunner Enterprise's deployment can be complex, focusing on extensive performance testing features.

Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Enterprise involves higher setup costs but provides significant ROI for extensive testing needs. Telerik Test Studio offers a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI, ideal for companies balancing cost and functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th), Regression Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 2.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	6.5%
Telerik Test Studio	2.0%
Other	91.5%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."

"For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable."

"We can book load generators."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."

"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."

"The solution supports a number of protocols."

"The most valuable aspect of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the overall support it has for a lot of different applications and defined domains."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

Cons

"The support team needs to be more coordinated."

"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."

"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."

"The worst thing about it is it did not have zero footprint on your PC."

"The technical support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and by including autocorrelation capability."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's reporting should be quicker, easier, and more flexible."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise needs to add more features for Citrix performance-based applications testing. This was one of the challenges we observed. Additionally, we experienced some APIs challenges."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ROI is 200%."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"The price is really steep. It's an enterprise-level tool."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"There is an ROI. What LoadRunner does, is it prevents failures when there are many, many concurrent users in the systems of a company."

"The tool is very expensive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	73

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

The price of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), including pricing, licensing, and setup cost, is reasonable. It is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 12% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 9% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

December 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.