IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #21, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

425 Views
128 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 84 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,333 Views
1,890 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 18, 2025

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and IBM Rational Test Workbench compete in performance testing. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise has an edge in pricing and support, while IBM Rational Test Workbench offers superior features that justify its cost.

Features: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise provides robust load testing capabilities, extensive protocol support, and advanced analytics. IBM Rational Test Workbench stands out with its seamless integration with other IBM products, advanced automation features, and complex testing scenario support.

Room for Improvement: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise could enhance its user interface for more intuitiveness, improve initial setup processes, and expand its cloud capabilities. IBM Rational Test Workbench can refine its pricing model to be more competitive, enhance cross-platform compatibility, and streamline update processes to reduce downtime.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Test Workbench is noted for smooth deployment and excellent integration with existing systems, coupled with reliable customer support. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, despite a more complex setup, is supported by dependable customer service addressing user needs effectively.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is generally more cost-effective, offering lower initial setup costs and solid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. IBM Rational Test Workbench incurs higher setup costs but delivers greater ROI in environments maximizing its advanced features and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (16th), Test Automation Tools (37th)

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.8%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Good integration with other tools, stable, scales easily

There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation. This includes the workbench as well as the other tools. In the future, I would like to see the other types of tests supported, that are not already covered in the DevOps approach. This would include, for example, penetration testing.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."

"For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable."

"It offers easy integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace, Splunk, etc."

"We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center."

"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."

"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."

"The tool's most valuable features are scripting, correlations, and parameterization. Debugging is also easy."

"You can test a huge variety of applications, not just web-based systems, but SAP, Oracle, web services, pretty much anything out in the market place, but it's mobile-based testing."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."

"We are expecting more flexible to use Jenkins in continuous integration going forward."

"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."

"I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering."

"The worst thing about it is it did not have zero footprint on your PC."

"It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems."

"Integration can be tricky during the setup process."

"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"They have a much more practical pricing model now."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

Government

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 56% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 44% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 34% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

July 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

July 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.