IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #17, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.6% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

643 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 84 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,306 Views
1,822 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and IBM Rational Test Workbench compete in the performance testing category. IBM Rational Test Workbench appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features.

Features: OpenText shines with robust load generation, test flexibility, and comprehensive protocol support. IBM boasts strong integration capabilities, seamless collaboration, and extended user testing scenarios, offering a distinct advantage in integration features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText can improve in integration with third-party tools, advanced reporting, and enhancing its user interface. IBM could benefit from more competitive pricing, a simpler deployment model, and streamlined initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. IBM offers extensive deployment options suited to varied environments and comprehensive support services that enhance user confidence.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers attractive setup costs with quick ROI perception. IBM requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term returns through its extensive feature set, making it a wise choice for enterprises seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (14th), Test Automation Tools (32nd)

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.1%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	6.1%
IBM Rational Test Workbench	1.6%
Other	92.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"We can book load generators."

"It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening"

"It offers easy integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace, Splunk, etc."

"You can test a huge variety of applications, not just web-based systems, but SAP, Oracle, web services, pretty much anything out in the market place, but it's mobile-based testing."

"Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate."

"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."

"I like how you can make modifications to the script on LoadRunner Enterprise. You don't have to go into the IDE itself."

"The product is very user-friendly."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"Micro Focus's technical support could be more responsive."

"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."

"Canned reports are always a challenge and a question with customers because customers want to see sexy reports."

"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."

"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise doesn't support some mainframe protocols. We had to build scripts to access the interface."

"I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools."

"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."

"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"The price is really steep. It's an enterprise-level tool."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"We used the Professional version and then moved to the enterprise version. We have subscribed to 1000 user licenses. The tool will be super expensive if we take up 5,000 user licenses. We have to limit ourselves on testing."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

The price of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), including pricing, licensing, and setup cost, is reasonable. It is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 21% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 21% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 13% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 14% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

November 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

December 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.