OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Tricentis NeoLoad both compete in the enterprise performance testing market. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise has the upper hand due to its comprehensive protocol support and robust enterprise capabilities, whereas NeoLoad appeals to smaller businesses with its cost-effectiveness and ease of use.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise provides extensive protocol support, web-based testing capabilities, and strong analytics tools. Its detailed reporting and scalability support numerous concurrent users. NeoLoad's user-friendly scripting and real-time monitoring, combined with licensing flexibility and integration with tools like Selenium and Jenkins, suit businesses seeking quick script execution.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner needs enhanced cloud integration, improved technical support, and refined reporting features. NeoLoad requires expanded protocol support, better third-party tool integration, and enhanced reporting and analysis. LoadRunner is often viewed as expensive, while NeoLoad's pricing is more attractive but needs improved protocol compatibility and complex script maintenance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support on-premises and hybrid cloud environments. LoadRunner is known for complex enterprise deployment, whereas NeoLoad offers a streamlined setup. Customers find LoadRunner's support delayed, while NeoLoad's support is quicker and more responsive, reflecting its user-friendly service approach.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner is considered costly and suited for rigorous enterprise testing with high ROI in diverse protocols. Its pricing reflects a premium model for large enterprises. NeoLoad is budget-friendly with flexible licensing for short-term and ongoing needs, making it a cost-effective choice for less complex testing solutions. Both tools demonstrate strong ROI, with LoadRunner better suited for extensive enterprise scenarios.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
I can rate it around eight because I think they are much faster than OpenText or Micro Focus.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
For scalability, I can rate Tricentis NeoLoad around three.
However, it remains quite stable.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
The cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
I find that my team is using the features at Tricentis NeoLoad most effectively, as my role is to get that data out of the tool, and they do the analysis.
Tricentis NeoLoad excels at generating different kinds of loads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 11.6% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.4% |
| Other | 82.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
