Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Apache JMeter is cost-effective, scalable, and integrates with CICD, offering significant ROI without licensing costs.
Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering enhances reliability, reduces downtime, prevents crashes, and offers a 200% ROI by identifying system issues early.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
Automation Architect at Aion Digital
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Apache JMeter relies on a large community for support, offering helpful but sometimes delayed assistance compared to commercial tools.
Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering's support quality varies, with experiences ranging from excellent service to slow responses and unhelpful documentation.
With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
Automation Architect at Aion Digital
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Apache JMeter is scalable but faces challenges with high loads and complex configurations, benefiting from distributed and cloud setups.
Sentiment score
7.6
LoadRunner Enterprise scales well and flexibly, but faces challenges with memory use and license costs impacting adoption.
We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.
QA Manager at Synechron
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Apache JMeter is reliable but faces stability issues with high loads and requires careful management for enterprise applications.
Sentiment score
7.4
LoadRunner Enterprise is generally stable but may face occasional issues due to infrastructure, version upgrades, and maintenance needs.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
However, it remains quite stable.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Apache JMeter needs enhanced user-friendliness, scalability, protocol support, and better integration with CI/CD tools and documentation.
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise struggles with UI, integration, reporting, support, and pricing, leading users to consider alternatives.
With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Apache JMeter is a cost-effective, open-source performance testing tool suitable for smaller projects with extensive community and plugin support.
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is costly but offers value, requiring careful planning to optimize virtual user license expenses.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
It's a cost-effective solution.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
Apache JMeter is completely free as it is open-source.
Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Apache JMeter offers a user-friendly, open-source platform for scalable, automated, and cost-effective performance testing with strong community support.
LoadRunner Enterprise enhances testing efficiency with scalability, advanced reporting, integration, and real-time analysis, benefiting global application performance management.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
Performance Test Engineer at CEI
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter
Ranking in Performance Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (1st)
OpenText Enterprise Perform...
Ranking in Performance Testing Tools
6th
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 13.6%, down from 24.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 6.1%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apache JMeter13.6%
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)6.1%
Other80.3%
Performance Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RR
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly
Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.
reviewer2668566 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support
The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise56
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise73
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
The price of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), including pricing, licensing, and setup cost, is reasonable. It is neither cheap nor expensive.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with mod...
 

Also Known As

JMeter
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.