Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,432 Views
1,174 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 86 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

5,878 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Akamai CloudTest are both strong contenders in the performance testing category. In terms of supporting larger and more complex testing environments, LoadRunner Enterprise seems to have the advantage, optimizing its use for enterprise-level needs. Akamai CloudTest, however, excels with dynamic scaling capabilities, ideal for agile environments that require quick adaptability.

Features: LoadRunner Enterprise offers comprehensive test management, extensive protocol support, and excellent test environment management, essential for diverse testing conditions. Akamai CloudTest delivers real-time analytics, efficient workload spike handling, and superior real-time data visualization, catering to dynamic cloud testing needs.

Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Enterprise could improve in terms of deployment speed, integration flexibility, and customization options for various environments. Akamai CloudTest could enhance its test management features, expand protocol support, and refine its analytics further to compete better with enterprise-level solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Enterprise focuses on a structured deployment approach, ensuring thorough testing and reliable but traditional customer service. Akamai CloudTest highlights quicker deployment, ease of use, and responsive customer service, suitable for rapid test setups and execution needs.

Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Enterprise requires a significant initial investment, justified by its comprehensive features over time, offering potential substantial ROI. Akamai CloudTest's pricing is more variable, aligning with smaller budgets and offering faster returns through flexibility and scalability, suitable for dynamic environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 7.1%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	7.1%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	89.8%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Vikram Katta

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has supported web app peak analysis but needs better setup and smarter scripting

Regarding points for improvement for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I see that features are not being fully developed yet. If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists. If any AI features could replace or eliminate more manual work on the correlation part, that is where we could see a game-changing improvement for the tool. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) can be positioned very well in the market. However, I see that the basic correlations are only being handled by the autocorrelation engine in the LoadRunner tool, and I would expect a few improvements to handle even complex correlation problems so that the tool can be appropriately positioned compared to their peers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The solution is very stable."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high, but it gives more value for money than some cheaper alternatives."

"Looking at the load of more of the applications and the testing needs have definitely been met."

"Our main use case for the product was load and stress testing. It helped us put the system under stress by injecting in multiple users, such as 5,000 users."

"The technology will do great things for you if you have a plan and a structure and you know what you want it to do for you."

"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."

"It's the most flexible and best solution for our people who are both offshore and onshore because of the reporting capabilities."

"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend."

"More features to support testing in DevOps environment(s)."

"The support team needs to be more coordinated."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools."

"A room for improvement in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is that it should take multiple exhibitions for a particular scenario and have automatic trending for that. This will be a very useful feature that lets users look into how many exhibitions happened for the scenario and their performance, and you should be able to see the data within the Performance Center dashboard. For example, there's one scenario I'm focusing on multiple times in a month, and if I check five times, there's no way for me to see the trend and find out how it went with those five exhibitions. It would be great if the Performance Center has a view of all five exhibitions, particularly transaction by transaction, and how they happened. If Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise shows you the time trends, information about one exhibition to another, and how each performed, it'll be an immense feature, and that should be visible to every user. Reporting should be simpler in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. If I did a scenario with one exhibition now, and I did that scenario again, then I should be able to schedule that scenario for the exhibition, and if that scenario is executed multiple times, there should be the option to turn it into a single view that shows you all the transactions, how the performance was, what the trend graph is for a particular time, etc."

"New features have been added in latest version and need to be improved with the DevOps integration."

"The migration from LoadRunner to Performance Center was not as smooth as I would have liked."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"This solution can be expensive."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"The prices would differ depending on the number of licenses you need. I wouldn't maybe compare it to any other tools. I rate the price as seven out of ten."

"The solution should decrease its price."

"The price is a bit too high."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

15%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

My use case for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is related to enterprise twenty six, which we are going to upgrade now. We focus on web applications.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 6% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

September 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.