OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs RadView WebLOAD comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Radview are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Radview is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 7.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Radview’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 69% of Radview users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 86 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

5,878 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

RadView WebLOAD

Read 9 RadView WebLOAD reviews

1,675 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

69% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

RadView WebLOAD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and RadView WebLOAD are competing products in the performance testing domain. RadView WebLOAD has the upper hand with robust features despite OpenText’s favorable pricing and support.

Features:OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering provides extensive integration options, advanced analytics, and comprehensive performance testing capabilities for large-scale projects. RadView WebLOAD offers real-time load simulation, supports both web and mobile testing, and has detailed reporting features.

Room for Improvement:OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering could benefit from improved user interface design, faster deployment times, and lower initial setup costs. RadView WebLOAD could improve by offering deeper analytics, more robust support for large enterprise environments, and enhanced integration options with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a structured approach tailored for enterprise setups, with responsive customer support. RadView WebLOAD is designed for quick deployment with efficient customer service well-suited for small to medium-sized operations.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering involves higher initial costs but promises substantial long-term ROI with its comprehensive capacities. RadView WebLOAD provides a cost-effective initial setup, with ROI driven by rapid deployment and adaptability, making it ideal for agile environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RadView WebLOAD

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 7.1%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RadView WebLOAD is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	7.1%
RadView WebLOAD	3.5%
Other	89.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vikram Katta

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has supported web app peak analysis but needs better setup and smarter scripting

Regarding points for improvement for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I see that features are not being fully developed yet. If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists. If any AI features could replace or eliminate more manual work on the correlation part, that is where we could see a game-changing improvement for the tool. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) can be positioned very well in the market. However, I see that the basic correlations are only being handled by the autocorrelation engine in the LoadRunner tool, and I would expect a few improvements to handle even complex correlation problems so that the tool can be appropriately positioned compared to their peers.

Read full review

it_user1265766

Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.

IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated

You pay for the number of users that you're going to be utilizing. In order to scale up, you would have to pay for additional users, but for our use case, we're able to scale fairly easily. We have a license for 500, but we're using half of that for our initial workflow. For maintenance, as far as I'm aware, there's only one person really working on the maintenance of it and we only really have one user consistently using the software. He's a QA person. We don't have any plans to increase our usage. Even though we've had it for a while, we have a major push to start utilizing it more. I imagine we'll probably be using it and utilizing it across our QA team in the next year. We're in the process of determining whether we're going to keep it or not due to the fact that it is so expensive. That's why I've been researching alternatives for the RadView.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For me, it's the fact that I can train my team on a single tool; it really is kind of our Swiss Army Knife in that it can handle so many different types of protocols and technologies, and I don't have to train my team on multiple tools to handle each of those."

"ALM centralizes everything, allowing you to see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, whether you have mapped all your requirements, and to produce metrics fairly easily for your line management and higher, making it far better than people using Excel spreadsheets."

"This helps us to uncover some very high and critical performance-related defects, and keeping almost zero production issues related to the performance of applications since then."

"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."

"Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."

"We are able to connect and run tests from different locations with this tool."

"It has offered me some reliability against other products, like JMeter or some other tools."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"The tool itself is very viable for us."

"Customer service is excellent; they're very responsive and willing to work extra hours, and in the first couple of hours that we were up and running, they taught us how to implement it and to figure out and negotiate AWS."

"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

"They are the best of all of the vendors I deal with, hands down."

"The analytics pack is probably one of the most powerful tools that I've seen."

"The solution is simple and useful."

"Technical support has been excellent, responsive, and helpful in trying to work through issues and questions."

"The ability to conceptualize the experience for users is great, the price as the bang for your buck is good, the user interface is quite user friendly, and the graphics make it easy to follow and are easy to identify."

More RadView WebLOAD pros

Cons

"Integration can be tricky during the setup process."

"They need to focus on minimizing the cost."

"OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."

"The previous versions were pretty unstable, but that's been fixed now."

"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."

"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."

"I think some enhanced support, be it online or documentation, would be appreciated."

"Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"Well there’s one issue when I have five or six scripts-- you have to set up different percentages and the number of connections and users, no matter how I tweak it seems that when I have one of the load scripts in the mix set, a percentage of less than 8-10%, there’s a probability that it won’t run at all."

"It would be great, in addition to the load tool, it would be nice, if Radview offered a JavaScript based functional test tool as well."

"There is no analytical dashboard."

"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."

"They can improve in the reporting - the ability to generate custom reports."

"I would like to be able to edit a scenario instead of re-recording a scenario."

"We did have an issue with some of the script working incorrectly in our higher environments."

More RadView WebLOAD cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an ROI. What LoadRunner does, is it prevents failures when there are many, many concurrent users in the systems of a company."

"This solution can be expensive."

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

"The price is a bit too high."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"We purchased the license via SAP."

"The tool is very expensive."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"We purchased a license for two years."

"It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Performing Arts

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

My use case for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is related to enterprise twenty six, which we are going to upgrade now. We focus on web applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 9% of the time

Original Software Qualify vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 7% of the time

More RadView WebLOAD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Download RadView WebLOAD product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

RadView WebLOAD is a robust load testing tool designed for agile web and mobile application development. It offers comprehensive testing capabilities to ensure application performance under varying traffic loads, meeting the demands of tech-savvy users.

RadView WebLOAD supports complex performance testing scenarios, making it indispensable for developers and QA teams. By simulating thousands of users, it helps identify potential bottlenecks before deployment. This tool provides detailed analytics and reporting, allowing teams to pinpoint issues and optimize application performance.

What are the standout features of RadView WebLOAD?

Load Generation: Efficiently simulate large-scale user traffic from multiple locations.
Script Creation: Flexible scripting using JavaScript for customizing test scenarios.
Real-time Monitoring: Track KPIs and diagnose issues during test execution.
Comprehensive Reporting: Access detailed reports and insights post-test to inform optimization strategies.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrate with CI/CD pipelines to enhance DevOps practices.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Insights: Gain actionable insights for enhancing application performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduce downtime and post-deployment fixes, lowering operational costs.
Scalability: Supports testing under various load conditions ensuring scalability.
Improved User Experience: Prevent performance issues that could affect user satisfaction.
Robust Support: Access to quality customer support and resources for troubleshooting.

In industries such as e-commerce and finance, RadView WebLOAD helps manage high traffic volumes. Retailers use it to prepare for seasonal peaks, while financial institutions rely on it to ensure transaction efficiency. It's an asset for any industry aiming to enhance application reliability and user satisfaction.

Radview

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.