OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Perforce is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 7.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Perforce’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 86 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

5,878 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,605 Views
1,121 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Perfecto compete in the field of application performance testing. LoadRunner Enterprise seems to have the upper hand thanks to its comprehensive protocol support and real-time monitoring capabilities, while Perfecto shines with its advanced mobile and cross-platform testing features.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is highlighted for its extensive protocol support, robust real-time performance monitoring, and high scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. Perfecto stands out with its cloud-based lab facilitating seamless device and browser integrations, robust automation features, and real-time test analysis.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) could improve by enhancing cloud integration and simplifying its monitoring features, potentially with improved real-time dashboards. Perfecto might focus on improving accessibility testing features, bettering the responsiveness of its cloud lab, and enhancing its reporting and analytics for more predictive insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is more suited for on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, although it can face challenges with technical support responsiveness post-HP transition. Perfecto aligns well with public cloud deployments, offering prompt customer service through its partner network and effective deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is considered a costly tool but justifies its price through high ROI by preventing production failures. Its flexible licensing options, such as pay-as-you-go, provide affordability. Perfecto offers competitive pricing and is generally more affordable, presenting good value with its cross-platform testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Perfecto

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), Mobile App Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 7.1%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 3.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	7.1%
Perfecto	3.6%
Other	89.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vikram Katta

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has supported web app peak analysis but needs better setup and smarter scripting

Regarding points for improvement for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I see that features are not being fully developed yet. If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists. If any AI features could replace or eliminate more manual work on the correlation part, that is where we could see a game-changing improvement for the tool. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) can be positioned very well in the market. However, I see that the basic correlations are only being handled by the autocorrelation engine in the LoadRunner tool, and I would expect a few improvements to handle even complex correlation problems so that the tool can be appropriately positioned compared to their peers.

Read full review

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ALM centralizes everything, allowing you to see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, whether you have mapped all your requirements, and to produce metrics fairly easily for your line management and higher, making it far better than people using Excel spreadsheets."

"We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing full-time, so that they in an agile fashion, on demand can go ahead and get real issue-finding testing done; then to go ahead and have that pulled into trending reports so that even subtle differences or trends over time are found and not just game-changing defects."

"It has offered me some reliability against other products, like JMeter or some other tools."

"Hewlett Packard Enterprise is a recognized leader in the performance testing space, and with every new software release, it continues to solidify its position as a front-runner and as an innovator."

"For us, the features we value and use the most are web and HTTP support."

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."

"The return on investment is immeasurable."

"Previously, we had different physical machines for each controller, and then we shifted to Performance Center, which allows users to log into a single instance and manage all other controllers from there."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"Perfecto has affected our software quality in a good way; it has allowed us to catch our defects earlier, thus improving the quality of our applications."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"The quality of our software has improved since we implemented this solution."

"Overall, it has definitely translated to cost savings and the reason is multifold."

"Perfecto's device lab has helped us to scale our testing and it has made testing easier for us."

"Overall, it results in huge cost savings for our company."

"The automation piece is the most valuable feature. Every time we had a new version of either OS or an application, we found that being able to automate the testing across different devices is very valuable."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"Almost all the areas improve drastically with each version; however, the correlation of scripts, analysis and reporting can be further improved. Their technical support could also be improved."

"I think some enhanced support, be it online or documentation, would be appreciated."

"Support is very poor. We've had a very frustrating experience with them."

"Currently, when we try open LRE we encounter cookie banner issues. However, I'm not sure if it is within the enterprise solution or with the vendors."

"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."

"Deletion of collating test results by admin access only."

"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."

"There are many issues that require day-to-day maintenance."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"So, overall, I would rate Perfecto a seven out of ten because sometimes, we also have lagging with some of the devices. We get error messages, but we're not quite sure what's causing them."

"I'm hoping they can support on-premises instances. We have been working on a JIRA integration with Perfecto—and I'm extremely impressed that they have that—but at this time they're not supporting onsite JIRA instances, which is what we have."

"It does well for mobile testing, but when it comes to the web aspect, it is lagging a little bit in terms of execution."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times."

"The flakiness, or the accuracy, of the test execution can be improved. Also, the responsiveness of their cloud lab could be improved as well."

"We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

"The prices would differ depending on the number of licenses you need. I wouldn't maybe compare it to any other tools. I rate the price as seven out of ten."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"We used the Professional version and then moved to the enterprise version. We have subscribed to 1000 user licenses. The tool will be super expensive if we take up 5,000 user licenses. We have to limit ourselves on testing."

"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

My use case for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is related to enterprise twenty six, which we are going to upgrade now. We focus on web applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.