OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. ReadyAPI Performance

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 8.4%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Performance is 3.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	8.4%
ReadyAPI Performance	3.1%
Other	88.5%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Open-source and flexible but needs client-side scripting

It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS. Also, the APIs tested with SoapUI can be directly used, avoiding the need to create collections like in Postman. The client-side scripting, if incorporated, would provide a complete solution for performance tests. It can handle user distribution and transaction throughput distribution effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"The reason we chose it and the most valuable feature is the amount of virtual users we can run in a test; we have run up to 900,000 users."

"A vital feature of the solution is its ability to compose realistic scenarios for performance testing"

"The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything."

"The fact that you don't have to worry about the infrastructure setup and that thousands of virtual users can log on to the cloud without having to set up provides a powerful, easy solution for new or existing customers."

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"It has helped improve productivity and functionality."

"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

"The performance and reporting of this solution have been its most valuable features."

"We find the product to be scalable."

"Eventually, we enhanced the whole automation, and how it should get integrated with the hardware, or another tool like Jenkins for CI/CD automation."

"We can scale."

"It is a very good and handy product, there are so many features, and it is getting more popular day by day."

"It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS."

Cons

"The initial setup is complex, but that is the nature of the technology."

"An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries."

"During the initial days of high concurrency testing (300,000 and 600,000) we had issues with the StormRunner infrastructure e.g. graphs disappeared in the middle of a test, and HP had to give an online fix."

"I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods."

"At this time, Micro Focus is handling the support, which is kind of messy compared to going directly to HP."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols."

"I think the report page could be improved, although we have used the reporting feature."

"I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"I want the solution to be able to monitor Apache Kafka activity as well."

"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

"I'm not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing."

"It is very slow sometimes."

"The solution’s interface could be improved."

"We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

"This solution could be improved by offering artificial AI testing in addition to API testing. For example, we would like to have machine learning testing because when test applications, manual work could be completed automatically using this functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's a very expensive solution"

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."

"We find the cost to be affordable."

"ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Media Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

Regarding improvements in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), the initial configuration where we have to set up orchestration is something that could be improved. If they make...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI Performance?

Load UI is mostly free, and the pricing for the pro version is very affordable compared to other tools like LoadRunner.

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Performance?

The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool.

What is your primary use case for ReadyAPI Performance?

The primary use case is to conduct server-side performance tests, scalability tests, and endurance tests using SoapUI and Load UI.

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 7% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 22% of the time

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

ReadyAPI Performance

Download ReadyAPI Performance product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

LoadUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Performance is known for its powerful load, spike, and operational volume testing, supported by robust reporting and security features. It ensures easy deployment and seamless integration with platforms like Azure and AWS.

ReadyAPI Performance stands out due to its ability to handle comprehensive performance tests and measure transactions per second effectively. Its client-side scripting, coupled with impressive scalability and stability, aids in efficient defect identification and functionality validation. The tool is appreciated for supporting multiple assertions and generating detailed reports. Although users suggest enhancements like improved speed and better Apache Kafka activity monitoring, ReadyAPI Performance continues to be a trusted option for teams conducting server-side tests and evaluating web services.

What are the key features of ReadyAPI Performance?

Load and Spike Testing: Effective for evaluating site response under variable traffic conditions.
Extensive Reporting: Generates detailed performance analysis and user distribution reports.
Integration Capabilities: Bridges seamlessly with Azure, AWS, and multiple frameworks.
Client-side Scripting: Offers customization and automation for complex scenarios.
Multiple Assertions: Supports various types of assertions for thorough validation.

What are the advantages of using ReadyAPI Performance?

Scalability: Reliable under heavy loads, perfect for growing business demands.
Stability: Provides a stable environment for consistent testing outcomes.
Efficient Defect Identification: Automation boosts early bug detection.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers comprehensive features despite higher upfront costs.

Development and QA teams across industries leverage ReadyAPI Performance for fine-tuning API responses, integrating backend codes, and ensuring optimal performance in FinTech and banking services. By configuring automation for scalability and endurance tests, they validate transaction efficacy and backend integrations, especially with open banking services.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. ReadyAPI Performance