Tungsten RPA Logo

Tungsten RPA pros and cons

3.7 out of 5
894 followers
Post review
 

Tungsten RPA Pros review quotes

VP
May 19, 2021
The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things.
it_user1166328 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2019
The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.
SS
Jan 26, 2020
The drag and drop functionality is quite good.
Learn what your peers think about Tungsten RPA. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AC
Mar 5, 2021
The pricing of the solution is quite good.
RR
Jan 18, 2023
Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc.
RM
May 26, 2021
The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server.
Jamil Milhem - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 2, 2024
You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
KA
Mar 18, 2020
This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems.
AS
Jan 28, 2021
The OCR was quite stable and flexible.
RK
Jul 2, 2019
The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services.
 

Tungsten RPA Cons review quotes

VP
May 19, 2021
Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. 
it_user1166328 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2019
I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface.
SS
Jan 26, 2020
The solution needs to be scalable.
Learn what your peers think about Tungsten RPA. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AC
Mar 5, 2021
The process discovery could be a bit better.
RR
Jan 18, 2023
RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind.
RM
May 26, 2021
We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly.
Jamil Milhem - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 2, 2024
The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors.
KA
Mar 18, 2020
It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are.
AS
Jan 28, 2021
I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support.
RK
Jul 2, 2019
This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.