We performed a comparison between Nintex RPA and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
"The technical support must be improved."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
Nintex RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Nintex RPA is rated 7.4, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Helps automate tasks and increases efficiency but does stop working sometimes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Nintex RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Nintex RPA vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
