If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
Dell NetWorker suits enterprise environments, offering extensive plugins and integration with Data Domain. In comparison, NAKIVO Backup & Replication appeals with its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises needing quick deployment and essential features.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Kaseya 365 offers efficient IT management with features like automated patching and remote monitoring. Users appreciate its integration capabilities but seek improvements in performance and reporting tools. Its scalability and security functions make it suitable for diverse IT environments, though some desire a more intuitive design.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support.
My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support.
This solution is very expensive.
IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution.
This solution is very expensive.
IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution.
Pricing model constantly changes.
Make sure you do the homework to size the solution properly. Buy the Enterprise Plus licensing if you can afford it.
Pricing model constantly changes.
Make sure you do the homework to size the solution properly. Buy the Enterprise Plus licensing if you can afford it.
There's a yearly licensing cost. The costs might be around $2000 USD annually.
The product pricing here in Zimbabwe is good, I cannot complain.
There's a yearly licensing cost. The costs might be around $2000 USD annually.
The product pricing here in Zimbabwe is good, I cannot complain.
Iron Mountain Connect is valued for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Dell NetWorker is noted for its comprehensive feature set including cloud integration. Iron Mountain Connect offers strong support and easy deployment, while Dell NetWorker provides advanced capabilities suitable for large enterprises.
Pricing is on a case by case basis.
Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues.
Pricing is on a case by case basis.
Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues.
The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model.
The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model.
