


WatchGuard Firebox and Trellix Active Response are two prominent competitors in the network security category. Trellix Active Response tends to be seen as the stronger product due to its comprehensive feature set that justifies its higher cost.
Features: WatchGuard Firebox provides a simple and scalable solution with advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and straightforward integration with WiFi access points. Trellix Active Response offers refined threat response automation, integration with other security solutions, and advanced threat hunting and analysis tools suited for enterprise needs.
Room for Improvement: WatchGuard Firebox could enhance its configuration flexibility and may need better capacity for large-scale integrations. Some users find the learning curve of its system non-trivial. Trellix Active Response could improve by simplifying its complex deployment, streamlining feature richness for mid-sized businesses, and refining user interface elements for smoother user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard Firebox offers an intuitive setup process and strong customer support which facilitates quick deployment with minimal downtime. Trellix Active Response has a solid deployment framework but often requires complex configurations that might challenge smaller IT teams. Its customer service varies, though it is thorough with technical issues.
Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard Firebox is considered cost-effective, with lower setup costs yielding a strong ROI. Trellix Active Response is priced higher but offers extensive features that can lead to a higher ROI for enterprises needing detailed insights and advanced threat handling. The decision often depends on organizational needs and budget constraints.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
While we haven't yet quantified the financial benefits, we recognize that there has been a return on investment, particularly with operational efficiencies provided by the alerts.
From a security standpoint, preventing even a single major security incident or prolonged outage can represent significant cost savings.
I do not see any return on investment after WatchGuard Firebox implementation in terms of cost reductions.
Reduced incidents and easier management helped lower operational cost.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
I would rate technical support from Trellix Active Response as a seven because sometimes we face difficulties finding engineers quickly, leading to customer frustration.
On a scale of one to 10, I would rate the technical support of the WatchGuard Firebox a 10.
When comparing WatchGuard Firebox with other vendors such as Fortinet, SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Sophos, WatchGuard Firebox performs competitively.
Most of the time, support engineers are knowledgeable and able to assist effectively with firewall configuration issues, VPN troubleshooting, firmware updates, and security-related concerns.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
The scalability of Active Response is satisfactory.
Overall, WatchGuard Firebox offers strong scalability for SMBs, MSPs, branch offices, and hybrid environments while keeping deployment and management relatively straightforward.
The user interface and features compared to newer firewalls are not up to the mark, which includes functionalities such as filtering, web filtering, threat protection, user identity, and UTM features that need improvement.
You can choose different models based on throughput and features, which makes it easy to support growing environments.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
I have just one WatchGuard Firebox unit that is licensed, and I have no bugs on it, so I am happy with that.
Once properly configured, the platform handles VPN connectivity, traffic inspection, and security services constantly, even in multi-site environments with remote users.
There are issues with traffic hitting the firewall, which could indicate performance problems related to throughput.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems similarly to how it is deployed for normal endpoints.
There is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility clearer and easier for customers to monitor malicious activities occurring in their environment.
It gives good visibility and control over the traffic, and the UI makes it easy to manage policies and respond quickly when something comes up.
The cost for renewal after three years is 75% of the hardware cost, which is a significant problem.
When implementing a rule using a group of IPs, it is not possible to do that directly.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective.
When we tried to renew the Palo Alto license, the cost was beyond any reasonable range.
Fortinet is more expensive than WatchGuard.
I find WatchGuard Firebox to be cost-effective.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the endpoints, allowing us to deploy a response quickly.
The most valuable feature of Trellix Active Response is that whenever any incident occurs, it allows us to disconnect from that particular network or area and shut down the system using commands.
The Firebox offers valuable features such as network security, URL filtering, UTM features, intrusion prevention and detection, and authentication.
The features of WatchGuard Firebox are most valuable for maintaining network security.
Some of the best features of WatchGuard Firebox in my experience are its ease of management, strong VPN capabilities, and integrated security services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.6% |
| WatchGuard Firebox | 1.3% |
| Trellix Active Response | 0.6% |
| Other | 94.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 101 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Trellix Active Response is designed for efficient endpoint protection and incident handling, with features like advanced analytics and user behavior monitoring. It allows swift identification of vulnerabilities and supports effective incident management through seamless system commands.
Focused on enabling secure corporate workstations, Trellix Active Response offers quick incident responses, comprehensive threat hunting, and defense visualization. The system prioritizes rapid log collection and correlation via the ePO dashboard, aiming to protect approximately 1,300 endpoints, especially on remote worker desktops and laptops. While it brings robust monitoring and investigation capabilities, the solution seeks improvements in analytics, interface clarity, and memory performance. There is a need for enhanced integration with on-premises deployments and AI functionalities.
What are the key features of Trellix Active Response?In corporate settings, Trellix Active Response is deployed for endpoint security, particularly for remote workstations that require robust protection. Companies transitioning from existing setups to Trellix benefit from its integration capabilities and threat hunting efficiency, supporting better management of active response tasks. Industry users appreciate the visual dashboard for improved threat response.
WatchGuard Firebox is a high-performance firewall known for its ease of setup, offering robust security with layered protection and centralized management capabilities.
WatchGuard Firebox stands out for its intuitive management and high throughput, addressing security needs with features like VPN, web filtering, and threat detection. Its centralized control and reporting abilities, along with Active Directory integration, make it popular among varied organizations. Its user-friendly interface and ongoing updates enhance usability and reliability. However, there's a call for better cloud-based administration, scalability, and improved integration with third-party vendors.
What are the key features of WatchGuard Firebox?WatchGuard Firebox is implemented across industries to secure internet gateways and protect data in multi-site businesses. Its applications span from Unified Threat Management (UTM) and intrusion prevention to compliance support in business environments requiring secure connectivity through VPNs.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.