Qlik Compose vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Qlik and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #38 with an average rating of 7.0, while WSO2 is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Qlik holds a 1.0% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,345 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,766 Views
742 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator are competing products in the data integration and transformation category. Qlik Compose has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Qlik Compose automates ETL processes, simplifies data preparation, and rapidly delivers insights. It excels in ETL efficiency, with features like data warehouse automation and easy data modeling. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator supports various integration patterns, enhances cloud compatibility, and processes real-time data efficiently. Its strength lies in broad integration capabilities, suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its integration features, expand its support for more data formats, and improve its graphical interface for better user experience. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may need improvements in reducing setup complexity, enhancing its documentation for better accessibility, and optimizing its resource usage for efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose supports quick deployment with simple configuration and responsive customer support, minimizing disruptions. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers a flexible deployment model, with thorough documentation and strong community support, but it requires more initial setup effort.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose offers competitive pricing, focusing on automation features that provide significant ROI for businesses seeking cost efficiency. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator's higher initial costs are counterbalanced by its comprehensive feature set, which brings long-term benefits. Qlik’s approach targets cost efficiency, while WSO2 emphasizes value propositions for in-depth integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

38th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	0.8%
Qlik Compose	1.0%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"It's a stable solution."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It is a scalable solution."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The solution's customer service is good."

"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"There could be more customization options."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 34% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Denodo vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

September 2025

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

West

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.