Qlik Compose vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Qlik and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #50, while WSO2 is ranked #29 with an average rating of 9.0. Qlik holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,138 Views
1,817 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

3,606 Views
1,911 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator are competing products in the data integration and transformation category. Qlik Compose has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Qlik Compose automates ETL processes, simplifies data preparation, and rapidly delivers insights. It excels in ETL efficiency, with features like data warehouse automation and easy data modeling. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator supports various integration patterns, enhances cloud compatibility, and processes real-time data efficiently. Its strength lies in broad integration capabilities, suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its integration features, expand its support for more data formats, and improve its graphical interface for better user experience. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may need improvements in reducing setup complexity, enhancing its documentation for better accessibility, and optimizing its resource usage for efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose supports quick deployment with simple configuration and responsive customer support, minimizing disruptions. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers a flexible deployment model, with thorough documentation and strong community support, but it requires more initial setup effort.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose offers competitive pricing, focusing on automation features that provide significant ROI for businesses seeking cost efficiency. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator's higher initial costs are counterbalanced by its comprehensive feature set, which brings long-term benefits. Qlik’s approach targets cost efficiency, while WSO2 emphasizes value propositions for in-depth integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

50th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	1.0%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough; it is user-friendly and intuitive."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It can scale."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may cost you about twenty-five thousand dollars annually per year compared to IBM Cloud Pak, which would cost you around one million dollars."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

More Qlik Compose cons

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"The configuration of the product is not an easy task for everyone."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

A typical use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is when I am in an interoperability environment with healthcare facilities and I have to put together a lot of applications that share some HL7 mes...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 4% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

April 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2026

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is known for its robust integration and transformation capabilities with a user-friendly interface. It provides comprehensive API management, format conversion, and integration standardization, ensuring efficient and scalable operations.

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is a versatile platform valued for integrating legacy systems, orchestrating APIs, and transforming data formats such as XML to JSON. Its open-source nature offers flexibility in adapting to diverse system requirements, making it a preferable choice in sectors like finance and healthcare. It helps expose internal services to external entities, supports microservices development, and fits well in enterprise service bus scenarios. Stability, performance, and cost-effectiveness are paramount, though customization and complex administration pose challenges. Improvements in documentation, integration studio, and support quality can enhance its service.

What are the key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies configuration and streamlines development tasks.
Integration and Transformation: Supports extensive adapters and connectors.
API Management: Facilitates format conversion and integration standardization.
Scalability and Performance: Ensures high stability and efficient operations.
Open-Source Flexibility: Allows seamless adaptation with diverse systems.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model despite high initial costs.
Stability and Reliability: Delivers consistent performance suitable for mission-critical projects.
Flexibility: Accommodates complex requirements efficiently.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Efficient Development: Speeds up tasks, improving developer productivity.

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is applied across different industry scenarios, primarily in integration projects connecting legacy and external platforms. In finance and banking, it supports core integration initiatives, while healthcare uses it for interoperability. Organizations benefit from its deployment in both on-premise and industry-specific environments, where it aids in building and managing microservices and APIs effectively.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

West

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.