Qlik Compose vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Qlik and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #45, while WSO2 is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Qlik holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,513 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

2,011 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator are competing products in the data integration and transformation category. Qlik Compose has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Qlik Compose automates ETL processes, simplifies data preparation, and rapidly delivers insights. It excels in ETL efficiency, with features like data warehouse automation and easy data modeling. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator supports various integration patterns, enhances cloud compatibility, and processes real-time data efficiently. Its strength lies in broad integration capabilities, suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its integration features, expand its support for more data formats, and improve its graphical interface for better user experience. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may need improvements in reducing setup complexity, enhancing its documentation for better accessibility, and optimizing its resource usage for efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose supports quick deployment with simple configuration and responsive customer support, minimizing disruptions. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers a flexible deployment model, with thorough documentation and strong community support, but it requires more initial setup effort.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose offers competitive pricing, focusing on automation features that provide significant ROI for businesses seeking cost efficiency. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator's higher initial costs are counterbalanced by its comprehensive feature set, which brings long-term benefits. Qlik’s approach targets cost efficiency, while WSO2 emphasizes value propositions for in-depth integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	0.9%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a stable solution."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"The installation process is easy."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

January 2026

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

West

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

December 2025

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.